Christopher Deans1, Stephen J Wigmore. 1. Tissue Injury and Repair Group, MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, Department of Clinical and Surgical Sciences, Medical School, Edinburgh University, Scotland, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cachexia remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality among cancer patients. The mechanisms underlying this syndrome remain unclear and are almost certainly multifactorial. Evidence from animal models suggests a compelling link between cachexia and inflammation, and a variety of pro-inflammatory cytokines play an integral role. This review summarizes current thinking relating to inflammation, cachexia and prognosis in cancer patients, with particular emphasis on studies relating to recent therapeutic advances. RECENT FINDINGS: Pro-inflammatory cytokines induce the acute phase protein response, a key marker of systemic inflammation. Recent evidence has also implicated other tumour-derived mediators, such as proteolysis-inducing factor and parathyroid hormone-related peptide. In addition, systemic inflammation has been found in association with many malignancies, and has been correlated with weight loss, hypermetabolism, anorexia, and adverse prognosis. Treatments such as fish oil, monoclonal antibodies, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, have all been utilized to attenuate systemic inflammation and influence weight loss. Recent clinical studies have suggested that eicosapentaenoic acid and cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors promote weight gain and downregulate the acute phase protein response. SUMMARY: Pro-inflammatory processes are clearly implicated in the hypermetabolism and weight loss associated with cancer-associated cachexia. In addition, the presence of systemic inflammation is now clearly linked with adverse prognosis in patients with cancer, which cannot be fully explained by the association with weight loss. Systemic inflammation remains an important area for novel therapeutic targets in combating cachexia, and eicosapentaenoic acid and cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors appear to be efficacious in the armory against cachexia.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cachexia remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality among cancerpatients. The mechanisms underlying this syndrome remain unclear and are almost certainly multifactorial. Evidence from animal models suggests a compelling link between cachexia and inflammation, and a variety of pro-inflammatory cytokines play an integral role. This review summarizes current thinking relating to inflammation, cachexia and prognosis in cancerpatients, with particular emphasis on studies relating to recent therapeutic advances. RECENT FINDINGS: Pro-inflammatory cytokines induce the acute phase protein response, a key marker of systemic inflammation. Recent evidence has also implicated other tumour-derived mediators, such as proteolysis-inducing factor and parathyroid hormone-related peptide. In addition, systemic inflammation has been found in association with many malignancies, and has been correlated with weight loss, hypermetabolism, anorexia, and adverse prognosis. Treatments such as fish oil, monoclonal antibodies, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, have all been utilized to attenuate systemic inflammation and influence weight loss. Recent clinical studies have suggested that eicosapentaenoic acid and cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors promote weight gain and downregulate the acute phase protein response. SUMMARY: Pro-inflammatory processes are clearly implicated in the hypermetabolism and weight loss associated with cancer-associated cachexia. In addition, the presence of systemic inflammation is now clearly linked with adverse prognosis in patients with cancer, which cannot be fully explained by the association with weight loss. Systemic inflammation remains an important area for novel therapeutic targets in combating cachexia, and eicosapentaenoic acid and cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors appear to be efficacious in the armory against cachexia.
Authors: Brandon N VanderVeen; Dennis K Fix; Ryan N Montalvo; Brittany R Counts; Ashley J Smuder; E Angela Murphy; Ho-Jin Koh; James A Carson Journal: Exp Physiol Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 2.969
Authors: Kandy T Velázquez; Reilly T Enos; Aditi A Narsale; Melissa J Puppa; J Mark Davis; E Angela Murphy; James A Carson Journal: J Nutr Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: James P White; Melissa J Puppa; Song Gao; Shuichi Sato; Stephen L Welle; James A Carson Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Jeannine Bachmann; Mathias Heiligensetzer; Holger Krakowski-Roosen; Markus W Büchler; Helmut Friess; Marc E Martignoni Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-03-18 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Jeannine Bachmann; Knut Ketterer; Christiane Marsch; Kerstin Fechtner; Holger Krakowski-Roosen; Markus W Büchler; Helmut Friess; Marc E Martignoni Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 4.430