Literature DB >> 20021215

Role of systemic inflammatory response in predicting survival in patients with primary operable cancer.

Campbell S D Roxburgh1, Donald C McMillan.   

Abstract

Disease progression in cancer is dependent on the complex interaction between the tumor and the host inflammatory response. There is substantial evidence in advanced cancer that host factors, such as weight loss, poor performance status and the host systemic inflammatory response, are linked, and the latter is an important tumor-stage-independent predictor of outcome. Indeed, the systemic inflammatory response, as evidenced by an elevated level of C-reactive protein, is now included in the definition of cancer cachexia. This review examines the role of the systemic inflammatory response in predicting survival in patients with primary operable cancer. Approximately 80 studies have evaluated the role of the systemic inflammatory response using biochemical or hematological markers, such as elevated C-reactive protein levels, hypoalbuminemia or increased white cell, neutrophil and platelet counts. Combinations of such factors have been used to derive simple inflammation-based prognostic scores, such as the Glasgow Prognostic Score, the neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio and the platelet:lymphocyte ratio. This review demonstrates that there is now good evidence that preoperative measures of the systemic inflammatory response predict cancer survival, independent of tumor stage, in primary operable cancer. The evidence is particularly robust in colorectal (including liver metastases), gastro-esophageal and renal cancers. As described in this article, measurement of the systemic inflammatory response is simple, reliable and can be clinically incorporated into current staging algorithms. This will provide the clinician with a better prediction of outcome, and therefore better treatment allocation in patients with primary operable cancer. Furthermore, systemic inflammation-based markers and prognostic scores not only identify patients at risk, but also provide well-defined therapeutic targets for future clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20021215     DOI: 10.2217/fon.09.136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Future Oncol        ISSN: 1479-6694            Impact factor:   3.404


  364 in total

1.  Modified glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor in gastriccancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinwu Zhang; Xi Chen; Tao Wu; Yan Zhang; Kun Yan; Xiaoli Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

2.  The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) is a good predictor of indication for palliative bypass surgery in patients with unresectable pancreatic and biliary cancers.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Ikuta; Hiroshi Takamori; Yasuo Sakamoto; Daisuke Hashimoto; Akira Chikamoto; Hideyuki Kuroki; Kazuya Sakata; Keita Sakamoto; Hiromitsu Hayashi; Katsunori Imai; Hidetoshi Nitta; Masahiko Hirota; Keiichiro Kanemitsu; Toru Beppu; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Prognostic role of systemic inflammatory response in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Wu; Xiaonan Fu; Xiaoli Zhu; Xuelian He; Chao Zou; Yijie Han; Mingchu Xu; Chengjin Huang; Xin Lu; Yulan Zhao
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Association of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with first-line docetaxel.

Authors:  Philipp Nuhn; Ajay M Vaghasia; Jatinder Goyal; Xian C Zhou; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Emmanuel S Antonarakis
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Prognostic Significance of the Immunological Indices in Patients Who Underwent Complete Resection of Pulmonary Metastases of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yuki Okazaki; Masatsune Shibutani; E N Wang; Hisashi Nagahara; Tatsunari Fukuoka; Yasuhito Iseki; Shinichiro Kashiwagi; Hiroaki Tanaka; Kiyoshi Maeda; Kosei Hirakawa; Masaichi Ohira
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Prognostic Scoring System for Patients Who Present with a Gastric Outlet Obstruction Caused by Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Teiichi Sugiura; Yukiyasu Okamura; Takaaki Ito; Yusuke Yamamoto; Ryo Ashida; Yukio Yoshida; Masaki Tanaka; Katsuhiko Uesaka
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Glasgow Prognostic Score is superior to ECOG PS as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal seeding.

Authors:  Shu-Qiang Yuan; Run-Cong Nie; Yong-Ming Chen; Hai-Bo Qiu; Xiao-Ping Li; Xiao-Jiang Chen; Li-Pu Xu; Li-Fang Yang; Xiao-Wei Sun; Yuan-Fang Li; Zhi-Wei Zhou; Shi Chen; Ying-Bo Chen
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Prognostic value of the Glasgow Prognostic Score in renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sung Ryul Shim; Se Joong Kim; Sun Il Kim; Dae Sung Cho
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  The pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and red cell distribution width predict prognosis in patients with laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Medine Kara; Sema Uysal; Uğur Altinişik; Sibel Cevizci; Oğuz Güçlü; Fevzi Sefa Dereköy
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Association between systemic inflammatory markers and serum prostate-specific antigen in men without prostatic disease - the 2001-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Alicia C McDonald; Manish A Vira; Adriana C Vidal; Wenqi Gan; Stephen J Freedland; Emanuela Taioli
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 4.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.