Literature DB >> 24948840

Markovian Interpretations of Dual Retrieval Processes.

C F A Gomes1, C J Brainerd2, K Nakamura3, V F Reyna4.   

Abstract

A half-century ago, at the dawn of the all-or-none learning era, Estes showed that finite Markov chains supply a tractable, comprehensive framework for discrete-change data of the sort that he envisioned for shifts in conditioning states in stimulus sampling theory. Shortly thereafter, such data rapidly accumulated in many spheres of human learning and animal conditioning, and Estes' work stimulated vigorous development of Markov models to handle them. A key outcome was that the data of the workhorse paradigms of episodic memory, recognition and recall, proved to be one- and two-stage Markovian, respectively, to close approximations. Subsequently, Markov modeling of recognition and recall all but disappeared from the literature, but it is now reemerging in the wake of dual-process conceptions of episodic memory. In recall, in particular, Markov models are being used to measure two retrieval operations (direct access and reconstruction) and a slave familiarity operation. In the present paper, we develop this family of models and present the requisite machinery for fit evaluation and significance testing. Results are reviewed from selected experiments in which the recall models were used to understand dual memory processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Markov chains; familiarity; fuzzy-trace theory; recollection; reconstruction

Year:  2014        PMID: 24948840      PMCID: PMC4058783          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2013.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Psychol        ISSN: 0022-2496            Impact factor:   2.223


  49 in total

1.  APPLICATION OF A MARKOV MODEL TO FREE RECALL AND RECOGNITION.

Authors:  W KINTSCH; C J MORRIS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-02

2.  Stimulus emphasis and all-or-none learning in concept identification.

Authors:  T R TRABASSO
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1963-04

3.  Learning theory and the new "mental chemistry".

Authors:  W K ESTES
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Repetition and learning.

Authors:  I ROCK
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1958-08       Impact factor: 2.142

5.  Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: a two-dimensional signal-detection model.

Authors:  Caren M Rotello; Neil A Macmillan; John A Reeder
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Overdistribution in source memory.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; V F Reyna; R E Holliday; K Nakamura
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  A unified framework for the functional organization of the medial temporal lobes and the phenomenology of episodic memory.

Authors:  Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.899

8.  The selection of strategies in cue learning.

Authors:  F RESTLE
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.

Authors:  A Koriat
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Remembering and knowing: two different expressions of declarative memory.

Authors:  B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  1 in total

1.  How does attribute ambiguity improve memory?

Authors:  C J Brainerd; M Chang; D M Bialer; X Liu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-07-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.