Literature DB >> 24948682

Can current crop models be used in the phenotyping era for predicting the genetic variability of yield of plants subjected to drought or high temperature?

Boris Parent1, François Tardieu2.   

Abstract

A crop model with genetic inputs can potentially simulate yield for a large range of genotypes, sites, and years, thereby indicating where and when a given combination of alleles confers a positive effect. We discuss to what extent current crop models, developed for predicting the effects of climate or cultivation techniques on a reference genotype, are adequate for ranking yields of a large number of genotypes in climatic scenarios with water deficit or high temperatures. We compare here the algorithms involved in 19 crop models. Marked differences exist in the representation of the combined effects of temperature and water deficit on plant development, and in the coordination of these effects with biomass production. The current literature suggests that these differences have a small impact on the yield prediction of a reference genotype because errors on the effects of different traits compensate each other. We propose that they have a larger impact if the crop model is used in a genetic context, because the model has to account for the genetic variability of studied traits. Models with explicit genetic inputs will be increasingly feasible because model parameters corresponding to each genotype can now be measured in phenotyping platforms for large plant collections. This will in turn allow prediction of parameter values from the allelic composition of genotypes. It is therefore timely to adapt crop models to this new context to simulate the allelic effects in present or future climatic scenarios with water or heat stresses.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crop model; drought; genetic variability; phenotyping.; temperature; tolerance; yield

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24948682     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  18 in total

1.  Modelling tiller growth and mortality as a sink-driven process using Ecomeristem: implications for biomass sorghum ideotyping.

Authors:  Florian Larue; Damien Fumey; Lauriane Rouan; Jean-Christophe Soulié; Sandrine Roques; Grégory Beurier; Delphine Luquet
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  A Model of Leaf Coordination to Scale-Up Leaf Expansion from the Organ to the Canopy.

Authors:  Pierre Martre; Anaelle Dambreville
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  A 3-D functional-structural grapevine model that couples the dynamics of water transport with leaf gas exchange.

Authors:  Junqi Zhu; Zhanwu Dai; Philippe Vivin; Gregory A Gambetta; Michael Henke; Anthony Peccoux; Nathalie Ollat; Serge Delrot
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 4.  Modelling the coordination of the controls of stomatal aperture, transpiration, leaf growth, and abscisic acid: update and extension of the Tardieu-Davies model.

Authors:  François Tardieu; Thierry Simonneau; Boris Parent
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 5.  Towards a multiscale crop modelling framework for climate change adaptation assessment.

Authors:  Bin Peng; Kaiyu Guan; Jinyun Tang; Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Senthold Asseng; Carl J Bernacchi; Mark Cooper; Evan H Delucia; Joshua W Elliott; Frank Ewert; Robert F Grant; David I Gustafson; Graeme L Hammer; Zhenong Jin; James W Jones; Hyungsuk Kimm; David M Lawrence; Yan Li; Danica L Lombardozzi; Amy Marshall-Colon; Carlos D Messina; Donald R Ort; James C Schnable; C Eduardo Vallejos; Alex Wu; Xinyou Yin; Wang Zhou
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 15.793

6.  Phosphoproteomic analysis of the response of maize leaves to drought, heat and their combination stress.

Authors:  Xiuli Hu; Liuji Wu; Feiyun Zhao; Dayong Zhang; Nana Li; Guohui Zhu; Chaohao Li; Wei Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 7.  Connecting Biochemical Photosynthesis Models with Crop Models to Support Crop Improvement.

Authors:  Alex Wu; Youhong Song; Erik J van Oosterom; Graeme L Hammer
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Optimization of Allelic Combinations Controlling Parameters of a Peach Quality Model.

Authors:  Bénédicte Quilot-Turion; Michel Génard; Pierre Valsesia; Mohamed-Mahmoud Memmah
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Towards a new generation of agricultural system data, models and knowledge products: Design and improvement.

Authors:  John M Antle; Bruno Basso; Richard T Conant; H Charles J Godfray; James W Jones; Mario Herrero; Richard E Howitt; Brian A Keating; Rafael Munoz-Carpena; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Pablo Tittonell; Tim R Wheeler
Journal:  Agric Syst       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.370

10.  Diverging temperature responses of CO2 assimilation and plant development explain the overall effect of temperature on biomass accumulation in wheat leaves and grains.

Authors:  Nicholas C Collins; Boris Parent
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.276

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.