Literature DB >> 24948332

Comparing bone microarchitecture by trabecular bone score (TBS) in Caucasian American women with and without osteoporotic fractures.

E Leib1, R Winzenrieth, O Lamy, D Hans.   

Abstract

Several cross-sectional studies have shown the ability of the TBS to discriminate between those with and without fractures in European populations. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of TBS to discriminate between those with and without fractures in a large female Caucasian population in the USA. This was a case-control study of 2,165 Caucasian American women aged 40 and older. Patients with illness or taking medications known to affect bone metabolism were excluded. Those in the fracture group (n = 289) had at least one low-energy fracture. BMD was measured at L1-L4, TBS calculated directly from the same DXA image. Descriptive statistics and inferential tests for difference were used. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were created to investigate possible association between independent variables and the status of fracture. Odds ratios per standard deviation decrease (OR) and areas under the ROC curve were calculated for discriminating parameters. Weak correlations were observed between TBS and BMD and between TBS and BMI (r = 0.33 and -0.17, respectively, p < 0.01). Mean age, weight, BMD and TBS were significantly different between control and fracture groups (all p ≤ 0.05), whereas no difference was noted for BMI or height. After adjusting for age, weight, BMD, smoking, and maternal and family history of fracture, TBS (but not BMD) remained a significant predictor of fracture: OR 1.28[1.13-1.46] even after adjustment. In a US female population, TBS again was able to discriminate between those with and those without fractures, even after adjusting for other clinical risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24948332     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-014-9882-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  15 in total

1.  Effects of Teriparatide, Denosumab, or Both on Spine Trabecular Microarchitecture in DATA-Switch: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Joy N Tsai; Linda A Jiang; Hang Lee; Didier Hans; Benjamin Z Leder
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Osteoporosis Imaging in the Geriatric Patient.

Authors:  Ursula Heilmeier; Jiwon Youm; Soheyla Torabi; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2016-02-15

Review 3.  Update on Imaging-Based Measurement of Bone Mineral Density and Quality.

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Galateia Kazakia
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Effect of denosumab on trabecular bone score in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  M R McClung; K Lippuner; M L Brandi; J R Zanchetta; H G Bone; R Chapurlat; D Hans; A Wang; C Zapalowski; C Libanati
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Maternal vitamin D and offspring trabecular bone score.

Authors:  N K Hyde; S L Brennan-Olsen; J D Wark; S M Hosking; K L Holloway; J A Pasco
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  The Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Complements DXA and the FRAX as a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Routine Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Didier Hans; Emőke Šteňová; Olivier Lamy
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Bone structure assessed by HR-pQCT, TBS and DXL in adult patients with different types of osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  R Kocijan; C Muschitz; J Haschka; D Hans; A Nia; A Geroldinger; M Ardelt; R Wakolbinger; H Resch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Trabecular bone score (TBS) as a new complementary approach for osteoporosis evaluation in clinical practice.

Authors:  N C Harvey; C C Glüer; N Binkley; E V McCloskey; M-L Brandi; C Cooper; D Kendler; O Lamy; A Laslop; B M Camargos; J-Y Reginster; R Rizzoli; J A Kanis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Simulated increased soft tissue thickness artefactually decreases trabecular bone score: a phantom study.

Authors:  Sasithorn Amnuaywattakorn; Chanika Sritara; Chirawat Utamakul; Wichana Chamroonrat; Arpakorn Kositwattanarerk; Kanungnij Thamnirat; Boonsong Ongphiphadhanakul
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Application of the Trabecular Bone Score in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Sung Hye Kong; Namki Hong; Jin-Woo Kim; Deog Yoon Kim; Jung Hee Kim
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2021-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.