Literature DB >> 24948041

Conceptualizing disability in US national surveys: application of the World Health Organization's (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework.

Diane E Brandt1, Pei-Shu Ho, Leighton Chan, Elizabeth K Rasch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Disability data inform resource allocation and utilization, characterize functioning and changes over time, and provide a mechanism to monitor progress toward promoting and protecting the rights of individuals with disability. Data collection efforts, however, define and measure disability in varied ways. Our objective was to see how the content of disability measures differed in five US national surveys and over time.
METHODS: Using the WHO ICF as a conceptual framework for measuring disability, we assessed the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), Current Population Survey (CPS), Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP), National Survey of SSI Children and Families (NSCF), and American Community Survey (ACS) for their content coverage of disability relative to each of the four ICF components (i.e., body functions, body structures, activities and participation, and environment). We used second-level ICF three-digit codes to classify question content into categories within each ICF component and computed the proportion of categories within each ICF component that was represented in the questions selected from these five surveys.
RESULTS: The disability measures varied across surveys and years. The NHIS captured a greater proportion of the ICF body functions and body structures components than did other surveys. The SIPP captured the most content of the ICF activities and participation component, and the NSCF contained the most content of the ICF environmental factors component.
CONCLUSIONS: This research successfully illustrated demonstrated the utility of the ICF in examining the content of disability measures in five national surveys and over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24948041     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0740-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  18 in total

1.  Mapping Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) items to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

Authors:  Kate Fairbairn; Kate May; Yvonne Yang; Sharan Balasundar; Cheryl Hefford; J Haxby Abbott
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-11-10

Review 2.  A comparative review of contemporary participation measures' psychometric properties and content coverage.

Authors:  Susan Magasi; Marcel W Post
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 3.  Measuring health among people with disabilities.

Authors:  Heather Becker
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar

4.  ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned.

Authors:  Alarcos Cieza; Szilvia Geyh; Somnath Chatterji; Nenad Kostanjsek; Bedirhan Ustün; Gerold Stucki
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 5.  Measuring participation as defined by the international classification of functioning, disability and health: an evaluation of existing measures.

Authors:  Linda Resnik; Matthew A Plow
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 6.  The myth and reality of disability prevalence: measuring disability for research and service.

Authors:  Suzanne McDermott; Margaret A Turk
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.554

7.  Content comparison of osteoporosis-targeted health status measures in relation to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

Authors:  Michael Borchers; Alarcos Cieza; Tanja Sigl; Barbara Kollerits; Nenad Kostanjsek; Gerold Stucki
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-09-14       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Mapping the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS-16) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

Authors:  Carolina Moriello; Kerry Byrne; Alarcos Cieza; Caryn Nash; Paul Stolee; Nancy Mayo
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 9.  Content comparison of quality of life questionnaires used in head and neck cancer based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a systematic review.

Authors:  U Tschiesner; S N Rogers; U Harréus; A Berghaus; A Cieza
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Measuring disability and monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics.

Authors:  Jennifer H Madans; Mitchell E Loeb; Barbara M Altman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Treatments and rehabilitation in the acute and chronic state of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  N Marklund; B-M Bellander; A K Godbolt; H Levin; P McCrory; E P Thelin
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA).

Authors:  Marianne Lindahl; Signe Andersen; Annette Joergensen; Christian Frandsen; Liselotte Jensen; Eirikur Benedikz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Dysphagia: current reality and scope of the problem.

Authors:  Pere Clavé; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  The influence of walkability on broader mobility for Canadian middle aged and older adults: An examination of Walk Score™ and the Mobility Over Varied Environments Scale (MOVES).

Authors:  Jana A Hirsch; Meghan Winters; Philippa J Clarke; Nathalie Ste-Marie; Heather A McKay
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Disability Items From the Current Population Survey (2008-2015) and Permanent Versus Temporary Disability Status.

Authors:  Bryce Ward; Andrew Myers; Jennifer Wong; Craig Ravesloot
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Assessing the content based on ICF and quality based on COSMIN criteria of patient-reported outcome measures of functioning in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Farkhondeh Jamshidi; Maryam Farzad; Joy C MacDermid; Azar Varahra; Seyed Ali Hosseini; Mojtaba Habibi Asgarabad
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Sexual orientation differences in functional limitations, disability, and mental health services use: Results from the 2013-2014 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Susan D Cochran; Charlotte Björkenstam; Vickie M Mays
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2017-08-31

8.  Associations between chronic conditions, body functions, activity limitations and participation restrictions: a cross-sectional approach in Spanish non-clinical populations.

Authors:  Carmen Rodríguez-Blázquez; Javier Damián; María José Andrés-Prado; Javier Almazán-Isla; Enrique Alcalde-Cabero; Maria João Forjaz; Juan Manuel Castellote; Jesús González-Enríquez; Pablo Martínez-Martín; Magdalena Comín; Jesús de Pedro-Cuesta
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Estimates of prevalence, demographic characteristics and social factors among people with disabilities in the USA: a cross-survey comparison.

Authors:  Eric Andrew Lauer; Andrew J Houtenville
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  A qualitative study: Barriers and support for participation for children with disabilities.

Authors:  Anne Marie Witchger Hansen; Musonde Siame; Judith van der Veen
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2014-11-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.