Literature DB >> 15372318

Content comparison of osteoporosis-targeted health status measures in relation to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

Michael Borchers1, Alarcos Cieza, Tanja Sigl, Barbara Kollerits, Nenad Kostanjsek, Gerold Stucki.   

Abstract

The most frequently used instruments for health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with osteoporosis are the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) and the Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire (OPAQ 2.0 and OPAQ SV). Since HRQL- and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-based approaches have both strengths and weaknesses, it is expected that they will be used simultaneously in clinical practice and research. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between osteoporosis-targeted instruments and the ICF. All three selected instruments cover body functions, including pain in back and emotional functions. Sleep functions and energy are represented in the QUALEFFO-41 and OPAQ 2.0 but not in the OPAQ SV. Body structures and environmental factors are covered only by the OPAQ 2.0 and OPAQ SV. The ICF provides an excellent framework when comparing the content of osteoporosis-targeted HRQL instruments and may be useful when selecting health status instruments for clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15372318     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-004-0991-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  20 in total

1.  Postal administration compared with nurse-supported administration of the QUALEFFO-41 in a population sample: comparison of results and assessment of psychometric properties.

Authors:  P Murrell; C J Todd; A Martin; J Walton; P Lips; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in clinical practice.

Authors:  G Stucki; A Cieza; T Ewert; N Kostanjsek; S Chatterji; T Bedirhan Ustün
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2002-03-20       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 3.  Generic health measurement: past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century.

Authors:  C A McHorney
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Working Party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis.

Authors:  P Lips; C Cooper; D Agnusdei; F Caulin; P Egger; O Johnell; J A Kanis; S Kellingray; A Leplege; U A Liberman; E McCloskey; H Minne; J Reeve; J Y Reginster; M Scholz; C Todd; M C de Vernejoul; I Wiklund
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people.

Authors:  L D Gillespie; W J Gillespie; M C Robertson; S E Lamb; R G Cumming; B H Rowe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

6.  Development of a short osteoporosis quality of life questionnaire by equating items from two existing instruments.

Authors:  X Badia; L Prieto; M Roset; A Díez-Pérez; M Herdman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Quality-of-life assessment in osteoporosis: health-status and preference-based measures.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Cristina S Hammond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Deterioration in quality of life following hip fracture: a prospective study.

Authors:  A G Randell; T V Nguyen; N Bhalerao; S L Silverman; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Postmenopausal spinal osteoporosis: flexion versus extension exercises.

Authors:  M Sinaki; B A Mikkelsen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  A framework for assessment in oncology rehabilitation.

Authors:  Laura S Gilchrist; Mary Lou Galantino; Meredith Wampler; Victoria G Marchese; G Stephen Morris; Kirsten K Ness
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-01-15

2.  Conceptualizing disability in US national surveys: application of the World Health Organization's (WHO) International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework.

Authors:  Diane E Brandt; Pei-Shu Ho; Leighton Chan; Elizabeth K Rasch
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Validation of the Portuguese version of the quality of life questionnaire of the European foundation for osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) in Brazilian women with postmenopausal osteoporosis with vertebral fracture.

Authors:  Néville de Oliveira Ferreira; Michael Arthuso; Raimunda Beserra da Silva; Aarão Mendes Pinto-Neto; Lúcia Costa-Paiva
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures used in stroke based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): a systematic review.

Authors:  S Geyh; A Cieza; B Kollerits; G Grimby; G Stucki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 3.440

5.  Test equating sleep scales: applying the Leunbach's model.

Authors:  Núria Duran Adroher; Svend Kreiner; Carolyn Young; Roger Mills; Alan Tennant
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 6.  Quality of life measurements in patients with osteoporosis and fractures.

Authors:  Melisa M Madureira; Rozana M Ciconelli; Rosa M R Pereira
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.365

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.