Literature DB >> 24947759

Motor contagion: the contribution of trajectory and end-points.

James W Roberts1, Spencer J Hayes, Makoto Uji, Simon J Bennett.   

Abstract

Increased involuntary arm movement deviation when observing an incongruent human arm movement has been interpreted as a strong indicator of motor contagion. Here, we examined the contribution of trajectory and end-point information on motor contagion by altering congruence between the stimulus and arm movement. Participants performed cyclical horizontal arm movements whilst simultaneously observing a stimulus representing human arm movement. The stimuli comprised congruent horizontal movements or vertical movements featuring incongruent trajectory and end-points. A novel, third, stimulus comprised curvilinear movements featuring congruent end-points, but an incongruent trajectory. In Experiment 1, our dependent variables indicated increased motor contagion when observing the vertical compared to horizontal movement stimulus. There was even greater motor contagion in the curvilinear stimulus condition indicating an additive effect of an incongruent trajectory comprising congruent end-points. In Experiment 2, this additive effect was also present when facing perpendicular to the display, and thus with end-points represented as a product of the movement rather than an external spatial reference. Together, these findings support the theory of event coding (Hommel et al., Behav Brain Sci 24:849-878, 2001), and the prediction that increased motor contagion takes place when observed and executed actions share common features (i.e., movement end-points).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24947759     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0589-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  27 in total

Review 1.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 2.  The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action.

Authors:  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Chris Frith
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus.

Authors:  Antonia F de C Hamilton; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Interference of grasping observation during prehension, a behavioural study.

Authors:  H C Dijkerman; M C Smit
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation.

Authors:  M Iacoboni; R P Woods; M Brass; H Bekkering; J C Mazziotta; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-12-24       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Motor interference and facilitation arising from observed movement kinematics.

Authors:  Robert M Hardwick; Martin G Edwards
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Automatic imitation of intransitive actions.

Authors:  Clare Press; Geoffrey Bird; Eamonn Walsh; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Movement interference in autism-spectrum disorder.

Authors:  E Gowen; J Stanley; R C Miall
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Intention understanding in autism.

Authors:  Sonia Boria; Maddalena Fabbri-Destro; Luigi Cattaneo; Laura Sparaci; Corrado Sinigaglia; Erica Santelli; Giuseppe Cossu; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus.

Authors:  James Stanley; Emma Gowen; R Chris Miall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  4 in total

1.  Eye movements may cause motor contagion effects.

Authors:  Merryn D Constable; John de Grosbois; Tiffany Lung; Luc Tremblay; Jay Pratt; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

2.  Sequential aiming in pairs: the multiple levels of joint action.

Authors:  James W Roberts; James Maiden; Gavin P Lawrence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Moving higher and higher: imitators' movements are sensitive to observed trajectories regardless of action rationality.

Authors:  Paul A G Forbes; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Examining the equivalence between imagery and execution within the spatial domain - Does motor imagery account for signal-dependent noise?

Authors:  James W Roberts; Greg Wood; Caroline J Wakefield
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.