Literature DB >> 18077067

Automatic imitation of intransitive actions.

Clare Press1, Geoffrey Bird, Eamonn Walsh, Cecilia Heyes.   

Abstract

Previous research has indicated a potential discontinuity between monkey and human ventral premotor-parietal mirror systems, namely that monkey mirror systems process only transitive (object-directed) actions, whereas human mirror systems may also process intransitive (non-object-directed) actions. The present study investigated this discontinuity by seeking evidence of automatic imitation of intransitive actions--hand opening and closing--in humans using a simple reaction time (RT), stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. Left-right and up-down spatial compatibility were controlled by ensuring that stimuli were presented and responses executed in orthogonal planes, and automatic imitation was isolated from simple and complex orthogonal spatial compatibility by varying the anatomical identity of the stimulus hand and response hemispace, respectively. In all conditions, action compatible responding was faster than action incompatible responding, and no effects of spatial compatibility were observed. This experiment therefore provides evidence of automatic imitation of intransitive actions, and support for the hypothesis that human and monkey mirror systems differ with respect to the processing of intransitive actions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18077067     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  27 in total

1.  Action mirroring and action understanding: an ideomotor and attentional account.

Authors:  Markus Paulus
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-06

2.  Neuropsychological perspectives on the mechanisms of imitation.

Authors:  Raffaella I Rumiati; Joana C Carmo; Corrado Corradi-Dell'Acqua
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Movements, actions and tool-use actions: an ideomotor approach to imitation.

Authors:  Cristina Massen; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The influence of goals on movement kinematics during imitation.

Authors:  Kelly S Wild; Ellen Poliakoff; Andrew Jerrison; Emma Gowen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Automatic imitation in a strategic context: players of rock-paper-scissors imitate opponents' gestures.

Authors:  Richard Cook; Geoffrey Bird; Gabriele Lünser; Steffen Huck; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Priming of hand and foot response: is spatial attention to the body site enough?

Authors:  Alison J Wiggett; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

7.  Orthogonal-compatibility effects confound automatic imitation: implications for measuring self-other distinction.

Authors:  Daniel Joel Shaw; Kristína Czekóová; Michaela Porubanová
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-10-17

8.  Facilitation and interference in spatial and body reference frames.

Authors:  Alison J Wiggett; Paul E Downing; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Interference of action perception on action production increases across the adult life span.

Authors:  Stephanie Wermelinger; Anja Gampe; Jannis Behr; Moritz M Daum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity.

Authors:  Ambra Bisio; Natale Stucchi; Marco Jacono; Luciano Fadiga; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.