Gregory B Auffenberg1, Joshua J Meeks. 1. Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 303 E. Chicago Ave., Tarry 16-703, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The American Urological Association (AUA) published new prostate cancer (CaP) screening guidelines in 2013. We apply the guidelines to a retrospective cohort to compare tumor characteristics of those no longer recommended for screening with those who remain screening candidates. METHODS: We identified cases of screening detected CaP (stage cT1c) in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database from October 2005 to December 2010. The 2013 AUA Guidelines were retrospectively applied to the cohort. Men were categorized into three groups for comparison based on whether or not they would now be recommended for CaP screening (Unscreened, Young Unscreened, and Screened). We compared clinical and pathological characteristics of CaP across study groups. RESULTS: A total of 142,382 men were identified. Screening would no longer be recommended for 40,160. Those no longer recommended for screening had higher median PSA (6.4 vs. 5.8 ng/mL, p < 0.01), more Gleason 7 and ≥8 CaP on prostate biopsy (36.4 vs. 34.8 %, p < 0.001; 12.4 vs. 9.2 %, p < 0.001, respectively) and slightly more Gleason ≥8 CaP (9.0 vs. 7.5 %, p = 0.03), and T3 tumors (17.3 vs. 16.5 %, p = 0.01) at prostatectomy. Nodal and distant metastasis rates were clinically equivalent among men screened and unscreened. Subgroup analysis of young patients (40-54 years old) no longer recommended for screening identified intermediate or high-risk Gleason scores at prostatectomy 57.6 % of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Features of CaP in men no longer recommended for routine screening are largely equivalent to if not worse than those in screened men.
PURPOSE: The American Urological Association (AUA) published new prostate cancer (CaP) screening guidelines in 2013. We apply the guidelines to a retrospective cohort to compare tumor characteristics of those no longer recommended for screening with those who remain screening candidates. METHODS: We identified cases of screening detected CaP (stage cT1c) in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database from October 2005 to December 2010. The 2013 AUA Guidelines were retrospectively applied to the cohort. Men were categorized into three groups for comparison based on whether or not they would now be recommended for CaP screening (Unscreened, Young Unscreened, and Screened). We compared clinical and pathological characteristics of CaP across study groups. RESULTS: A total of 142,382 men were identified. Screening would no longer be recommended for 40,160. Those no longer recommended for screening had higher median PSA (6.4 vs. 5.8 ng/mL, p < 0.01), more Gleason 7 and ≥8 CaP on prostate biopsy (36.4 vs. 34.8 %, p < 0.001; 12.4 vs. 9.2 %, p < 0.001, respectively) and slightly more Gleason ≥8 CaP (9.0 vs. 7.5 %, p = 0.03), and T3 tumors (17.3 vs. 16.5 %, p = 0.01) at prostatectomy. Nodal and distant metastasis rates were clinically equivalent among men screened and unscreened. Subgroup analysis of young patients (40-54 years old) no longer recommended for screening identified intermediate or high-risk Gleason scores at prostatectomy 57.6 % of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Features of CaP in men no longer recommended for routine screening are largely equivalent to if not worse than those in screened men.
Authors: H Ballentine Carter; Peter C Albertsen; Michael J Barry; Ruth Etzioni; Stephen J Freedland; Kirsten Lynn Greene; Lars Holmberg; Philip Kantoff; Badrinath R Konety; Mohammad Hassan Murad; David F Penson; Anthony L Zietman Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Roderick C N van den Bergh; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Monique J Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Chris H Bangma; Ewout W Steyerberg Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Scott E Eggener; Peter T Scardino; Patrick C Walsh; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Bruce J Trock; Zhaoyong Feng; David P Wood; James A Eastham; Ofer Yossepowitch; Danny M Rabah; Michael W Kattan; Changhong Yu; Eric A Klein; Andrew J Stephenson Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-01-15 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Edward P Gelmann; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Richard B Hayes; Barnett S Kramer; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Frej Filén; Mirja Ruutu; Hans Garmo; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Stefan Bratell; Anders Spångberg; Juni Palmgren; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-08-11 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Andrew J Vickers; David Ulmert; Daniel D Sjoberg; Caroline J Bennette; Thomas Björk; Axel Gerdtsson; Jonas Manjer; Peter M Nilsson; Anders Dahlin; Anders Bjartell; Peter T Scardino; Hans Lilja Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-04-15
Authors: K A Moses; Z Zhao; Y Bi; J Acquaye; A Holmes; W J Blot; J H Fowke Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Veda N Giri; Karen E Knudsen; William K Kelly; Wassim Abida; Gerald L Andriole; Chris H Bangma; Justin E Bekelman; Mitchell C Benson; Amie Blanco; Arthur Burnett; William J Catalona; Kathleen A Cooney; Matthew Cooperberg; David E Crawford; Robert B Den; Adam P Dicker; Scott Eggener; Neil Fleshner; Matthew L Freedman; Freddie C Hamdy; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Mark D Hurwitz; Colette Hyatt; William B Isaacs; Christopher J Kane; Philip Kantoff; R Jeffrey Karnes; Lawrence I Karsh; Eric A Klein; Daniel W Lin; Kevin R Loughlin; Grace Lu-Yao; S Bruce Malkowicz; Mark J Mann; James R Mark; Peter A McCue; Martin M Miner; Todd Morgan; Judd W Moul; Ronald E Myers; Sarah M Nielsen; Elias Obeid; Christian P Pavlovich; Stephen C Peiper; David F Penson; Daniel Petrylak; Curtis A Pettaway; Robert Pilarski; Peter A Pinto; Wendy Poage; Ganesh V Raj; Timothy R Rebbeck; Mark E Robson; Matt T Rosenberg; Howard Sandler; Oliver Sartor; Edward Schaeffer; Gordon F Schwartz; Mark S Shahin; Neal D Shore; Brian Shuch; Howard R Soule; Scott A Tomlins; Edouard J Trabulsi; Robert Uzzo; Donald J Vander Griend; Patrick C Walsh; Carol J Weil; Richard Wender; Leonard G Gomella Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Clement K Gwede; Stacy N Davis; Shaenelle Wilson; Mitul Patel; Susan T Vadaparampil; Cathy D Meade; Brian M Rivers; Daohai Yu; Javier Torres-Roca; Randy Heysek; Philippe E Spiess; Julio Pow-Sang; Paul Jacobsen Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2014-06-26