Literature DB >> 20299064

Do anxiety and distress increase during active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer?

Roderick C N van den Bergh1, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Monique J Roobol, Fritz H Schröder, Chris H Bangma, Ewout W Steyerberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anxiety and distress may be present in patients with low risk prostate cancer who are on active surveillance. This may be a reason to discontinue active surveillance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 150 Dutch patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance in a prospective active surveillance study received questionnaires at study inclusion and 9 months after diagnosis. We assessed changes in scores on decisional conflict with the decisional conflict scale, depression with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, generic anxiety with the State Trait Anxiety Inventory, prostate cancer specific anxiety with the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer and the self-estimated risk of progression. We explored scores 9 months after diagnosis vs those at study inclusion for physical health (SF-12 physical component summary), personality (Eysenck Personality Questionnaire), shared decision making, prostate cancer knowledge, demographics, medical parameters and prostate specific antigen doubling time during followup.
RESULTS: Questionnaires at study inclusion and 9 months after diagnosis were completed by 129 of 150 (86%) and 108 of 120 participants (90%) a median of 2.4 and 9.2 months after diagnosis, respectively. Anxiety and distress at study inclusion were previously found to be generally favorable. Significant but clinically irrelevant decreases were seen in mean scores of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (p = 0.016), Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer fear of progression subscale (p = 0.005) and the self-estimated risk of progression (p = 0.049). Anxiety and distress 9 months after diagnosis were mainly predicted by scores at study inclusion. Higher Eysenck Personality Questionnaire neuroticism score and an important role of the physician in the treatment decision had additionally unfavorable effects. Good physical health, palpable disease and older age had favorable effects. No association was seen for prostate specific antigen doubling time. Nine men discontinued active surveillance, including 2 due to nonmedical reasons.
CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety and distress generally remain favorably low during the first 9 months of surveillance. 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20299064     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  22 in total

1.  Baseline and follow-up association of the MAX-PC in Men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrea M Tavlarides; Steven C Ames; David D Thiel; Nancy N Diehl; Alexander S Parker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Decision preparation, satisfaction and regret in a multi-center sample of men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Donna L Berry; Qian Wang; Barbara Halpenny; Fangxin Hong
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-05-17

3.  The importance of perceived stress management skills for patients with prostate cancer in active surveillance.

Authors:  Betina Yanez; Natalie E Bustillo; Michael H Antoni; Suzanne C Lechner; Jason Dahn; Bruce Kava; Frank J Penedo
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-09-19

Review 4.  The impact of prostate biopsy on urinary symptoms, erectile function, and anxiety.

Authors:  Alexander P Glaser; Kristian Novakovic; Brian T Helfand
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  PSA-based prostate cancer screening: the role of active surveillance and informed and shared decision making.

Authors:  Lionne D F Venderbos; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: patient selection and management.

Authors:  L Klotz
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Factors Influencing Men's Choice of and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Mixed-method Systematic Review.

Authors:  Netty Kinsella; Pär Stattin; Declan Cahill; Christian Brown; Anna Bill-Axelson; Ola Bratt; Sigrid Carlsson; Mieke Van Hemelrijck
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Cross-cultural differences in men on active surveillance' anxiety: a longitudinal comparison between Italian and Dutch patients from the Prostate cancer Research International Active Surveillance study.

Authors:  Paola Dordoni; Sebastiaan Remmers; Riccardo Valdagni; Lara Bellardita; Letizia De Luca; Fabio Badenchini; Cristina Marenghi; Monique J Roobol; Lionne D F Venderbos
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.090

9.  Application of the 2013 American Urological Association early detection of prostate cancer guideline: who will we miss?

Authors:  Gregory B Auffenberg; Joshua J Meeks
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Clinical experience with active surveillance protocol using regular magnetic resonance imaging instead of regular repeat biopsy for monitoring: A study at a high-volume center in Korea.

Authors:  Hyun Kyu Ahn; Kwang Suk Lee; Kyo Chul Koo; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2020-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.