Literature DB >> 19144677

The clinical benefit of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer is independent of K-ras mutation status: analysis of a phase III study of bevacizumab with chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Herbert I Hurwitz1, Jing Yi, William Ince, William F Novotny, Oliver Rosen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mutations of the K-ras gene were identified as a prognostic marker in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In addition, emerging data suggest that K-ras mutations are a negative predictor of clinical benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatment in mCRC. Previously reported data suggest that the longer overall survival (OS) observed with bevacizumab treatment in mCRC is independent of alterations in the Ras/Raf/Mek/Erk pathway. We conducted additional analyses to better describe the clinical benefit of bevacizumab treatment in mCRC relative to K-ras mutation status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Additional statistical analyses were done with data from K-ras mutation analyses in 230 patients who were treated with irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (IFL) in combination with either bevacizumab or placebo in a randomized phase III study. Following microdissection, tissue was subject to DNA sequencing to identify K-ras mutations in codons 12 and 13. Hazard ratios for the bevacizumab group relative to the control group were estimated from an unstratified Cox regression model. The median progression-free survival (PFS), OS times, and objective response rates were compared.
RESULTS: K-ras status was assessed in 230 patients (28.3%). The median PFS was significantly longer in bevacizumab-treated patients with wild-type (wt)- (13.5 versus 7.4 months; hazard ratio 0.44, p < .0001) and mutant (m)-K-ras (9.3 versus 5.5 months; hazard ratio 0.41, p = .0008). A significantly higher response rate for IFL plus bevacizumab was observed only in wt-K-ras patients (60.0% versus 37.3%, p = .006) compared with 43.2% versus 41.2% in the m-K-ras group.
CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab provides significant clinical benefit in patients with mCRC expressing either mutant or wild-type K-ras.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19144677     DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  78 in total

1.  Uptake of KRAS mutation testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Europe, Latin America and Asia.

Authors:  Fortunato Ciardiello; Sabine Tejpar; Nicola Normanno; Domenica Mercadante; Tracey Teague; Bruno Wohlschlegel; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  Magnitude of benefit of the addition of bevacizumab to first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Fotios Loupakis; Emilio Bria; Vanja Vaccaro; Federica Cuppone; Michele Milella; Paolo Carlini; Chiara Cremolini; Lisa Salvatore; Alfredo Falcone; Paola Muti; Isabella Sperduti; Diana Giannarelli; Francesco Cognetti
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-26

3.  G12V and G12A KRAS mutations are associated with poor outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab.

Authors:  Ondrej Fiala; Tomas Buchler; Beatrice Mohelnikova-Duchonova; Bohuslav Melichar; Vit Martin Matejka; Lubos Holubec; Jana Kulhankova; Zbynek Bortlicek; Marie Bartouskova; Vaclav Liska; Ondrej Topolcan; Monika Sedivcova; Jindrich Finek
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-12-10

Review 4.  Targeted Therapies in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Gonzalo Tapia Rico; Amanda R Townsend; Vy Broadbridge; Timothy J Price
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Implementing prognostic and predictive biomarkers in CRC clinical trials.

Authors:  Sandra Van Schaeybroeck; Wendy L Allen; Richard C Turkington; Patrick G Johnston
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Is availability of anti-EGFR therapy for the colorectal adenocarcinomas showing fascin expression limited?

Authors:  Nazım Emrah Koçer; Fazilet Kayaselçuk
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.493

7.  Comparison of cetuximab to bevacizumab as the first-line bio-chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: superior progression-free survival is restricted to patients with measurable tumors and objective tumor response--a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yuan-Hao Yang; Jen-Kou Lin; Wei-Shone Chen; Tzu-Chen Lin; Shung-Haur Yang; Jeng-Kai Jiang; Yuan-Tzu Lan; Chun-Chi Lin; Chueh-Chuan Yen; Cheng-Hwai Tzeng; Hao-Wei Teng
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 8.  Molecular markers of prognosis and therapeutic targets in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Richard A Burkhart; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.279

Review 9.  Treatment in advanced colorectal cancer: what, when and how?

Authors:  I Chau; D Cunningham
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  KRAS mutation in colon cancer: a marker of resistance to EGFR-I therapy.

Authors:  Ahmad D Siddiqui; Bilal Piperdi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.