Joel Gaston1, Rebecca S Bartlett2, Sarah A Klemuk3, Susan L Thibeault4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 2. Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 3. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA thibeaul@surgery.wisc.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Biomaterials able to mimic the mechanical properties of vocal fold tissue may be particularly useful for furnishing a 3-dimensional microenvironment allowing for in vitro investigation of cell and molecular responses to vibration. Motivated by the dearth of biomaterials available for use in an in vitro model for vocal fold tissue, we investigated polyether polyurethane (PEU) matrices, which are porous, mechanically tunable biomaterials that are inexpensive and require only standard laboratory equipment for fabrication. METHODS: Rheology, dynamic mechanical analysis, and scanning electron microscopy were performed on PEU matrices at 5%, 10%, and 20% w/v mass concentrations. RESULTS: For 5%, 10%, and 20% w/v concentrations, shear storage moduli were 2 kPa, 3.4 kPa, and 6 kPa, respectively, with shear loss moduli being 0.2 kPa, 0.38 kPa, and 0.62 kPa, respectively. Storage moduli responded to applied frequency as a linear function. Mercury intrusion porosimetry revealed that all 3 mass concentrations of PEU have a similar overall percentage porosity but differ in pore architecture. CONCLUSION: Twenty-µm diameter pores are ideal for cell seeding, and a range of mechanical properties indicates that the lower [corrected] mass concentration PEU formulations are best suited for mimicking the viscoelastic properties of vocal fold tissue for in vitro research.
OBJECTIVE: Biomaterials able to mimic the mechanical properties of vocal fold tissue may be particularly useful for furnishing a 3-dimensional microenvironment allowing for in vitro investigation of cell and molecular responses to vibration. Motivated by the dearth of biomaterials available for use in an in vitro model for vocal fold tissue, we investigated polyether polyurethane (PEU) matrices, which are porous, mechanically tunable biomaterials that are inexpensive and require only standard laboratory equipment for fabrication. METHODS: Rheology, dynamic mechanical analysis, and scanning electron microscopy were performed on PEU matrices at 5%, 10%, and 20% w/v mass concentrations. RESULTS: For 5%, 10%, and 20% w/v concentrations, shear storage moduli were 2 kPa, 3.4 kPa, and 6 kPa, respectively, with shear loss moduli being 0.2 kPa, 0.38 kPa, and 0.62 kPa, respectively. Storage moduli responded to applied frequency as a linear function. Mercury intrusion porosimetry revealed that all 3 mass concentrations of PEU have a similar overall percentage porosity but differ in pore architecture. CONCLUSION: Twenty-µm diameter pores are ideal for cell seeding, and a range of mechanical properties indicates that the lower [corrected] mass concentration PEU formulations are best suited for mimicking the viscoelastic properties of vocal fold tissue for in vitro research.
Authors: Ingo R Titze; Robert W Hitchcock; Kelly Broadhead; Ken Webb; Wenhua Li; Steven D Gray; Patrick A Tresco Journal: J Biomech Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Bernard Rousseau; Shigeru Hirano; Troy D Scheidt; Nathan V Welham; Susan L Thibeault; Roger W Chan; Diane M Bless Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Rebecca S Bartlett; Joel D Gaston; Tom Y Yen; Shuyun Ye; Christina Kendziorski; Susan L Thibeault Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Rebecca S Bartlett; Joel D Gaston; Shuyun Ye; Christina Kendziorski; Susan L Thibeault Journal: J Biomech Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Renee E King; Hang Kuen Lau; Haiyan Zhang; Ishnoor Sidhu; Michael B Christensen; Eric W Fowler; Linqing Li; Xinqiao Jia; Kristi L Kiick; Susan L Thibeault Journal: Regen Eng Transl Med Date: 2019-02-27
Authors: Linqing Li; Jeanna M Stiadle; Hang K Lau; Aidan B Zerdoum; Xinqiao Jia; Susan L Thibeault; Kristi L Kiick Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 12.479