Literature DB >> 15475789

Viscoelastic properties of three vocal-fold injectable biomaterials at low audio frequencies.

Sarah A Klemuk1, Ingo R Titze.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Previous measurements of viscoelastic properties of Zyderm were to be extended to low audio frequencies, and properties of two other biomaterials not previously measured, thiolated hyaluronic acid (HA-DTPH) and Cymetra, were obtained. STUDY
DESIGN: Rheologic investigation.
METHODS: Oscillatory shear stress was applied to each sample using a controlled stress rheometer at frequencies between 0.01 and 100 Hz with a parallel plate apparatus. Versuscoelastic moduli were recorded at each frequency. The calculated resonance frequency of the machine and sample were then used to determine the maximum frequency at which reliable data existed. Extrapolation functions were fit to viscoelastic parameters, which predicted the properties up to 1,000 Hz.
RESULTS: Frequency trends of Zyderm were similar to those previously reported, whereas magnitudes were different. The elastic moduli logarithmically increased with frequency, whereas dynamic viscosity demonstrated shear thinning, a condition of primary importance for humans to vocalize over a broad frequency range. Previous measurements were extended from 15 Hz up to 74 Hz. Differences in magnitude between a previous study and the present study were attributed to particulate orientation during testing. Cymetra was found to have nearly identical viscoelastic properties to those of bovine collagen, both in magnitude and frequency trend, with reliable measures extending up to 81 Hz. Rheologic properties of the hyaluronic acid gel were the closest match to cadaveric vocal fold mucosa in magnitude and frequency trend.
CONCLUSIONS: Viscoelastic properties of Cymetra and Zyderm are nearly the same and are significantly greater than those of vocal fold mucosa. HA-DTPH possesses a good viscoelastic match to vocal fold mucosa and may be useful in future lamina propria repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15475789     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200409000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  20 in total

1.  In Vivo engineering of the vocal fold ECM with injectable HA hydrogels-late effects on tissue repair and biomechanics in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Susan L Thibeault; Sarah A Klemuk; Xia Chen; Beatriz H Quinchia Johnson
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Viscoelasticity of hyaluronic acid-gelatin hydrogels for vocal fold tissue engineering.

Authors:  Siavash Kazemirad; Hossein K Heris; Luc Mongeau
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.368

3.  Rheometric properties of canine vocal fold tissues: variation with anatomic location.

Authors:  Miwako Kimura; Ted Mau; Roger W Chan
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 1.863

Review 4.  [Therapy for unilateral vocal fold palsy].

Authors:  M Schuster; U Eysholdt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Rayleigh wave propagation method for the characterization of a thin layer of biomaterials.

Authors:  Siavash Kazemirad; Luc Mongeau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sensitivity of vocal fold vibratory modes to their three-layer structure: implications for computational modeling of phonation.

Authors:  Q Xue; X Zheng; S Bielamowicz; R Mittal
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  [Treatment of glottal gap].

Authors:  S Voigt-Zimmermann; C Arens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Experimental methods for the characterization of the frequency-dependent viscoelastic properties of soft materials.

Authors:  Siavash Kazemirad; Hossein K Heris; Luc Mongeau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Viscoelastic properties of phonosurgical biomaterials at phonatory frequencies.

Authors:  Miwako Kimura; Ted Mau; Roger W Chan
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  In vivo comparison of biomimetic approaches for tissue regeneration of the scarred vocal fold.

Authors:  Susan L Thibeault; Sarah A Klemuk; Marshall E Smith; Cecilia Leugers; Glenn Prestwich
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.