Literature DB >> 21664864

Promoting use-dependent plasticity with externally-paced training.

Suzanne J Ackerley1, Cathy M Stinear, Winston D Byblow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate use-dependent plasticity (UDP) before and after training under metronome-paced and self-paced conditions.
METHODS: Twelve healthy adults were recruited to this cross-over, pseudo-randomized, repeated measures study. Participants performed wrist extension training that was either self-paced, or externally-paced to an auditory metronome at their preferred movement frequency or at a more demanding frequency. Motor evoked potentials from transcranial magnetic stimulation of left primary motor cortex were recorded in right extensor carpi radialis (ECR) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) to assess corticomotor excitability. The direction and velocity of TMS-evoked wrist movement (stimulus-evoked velocity, SEV) were measured before and after training to evaluate UDP.
RESULTS: The most persistent UDP occurred when training was metronome-paced at the participant's preferred movement frequency. This training protocol produced spatially selective modulation of resting ECR and FCR corticomotor excitability and directional tuning of TMS-evoked wrist movement toward the trained direction. Metronome-paced training at a more demanding frequency resulted in nonspecific facilitation of resting corticomotor excitability, and did not alter TMS-evoked wrist movement.
CONCLUSIONS: These novel findings indicate that externally-paced training at the individual's preferred frequency facilitates UDP. SIGNIFICANCE: UDP underpins motor recovery after stroke. Externally-paced training may be a useful adjunct to movement rehabilitation therapy. Copyright Â
© 2011 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21664864     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  22 in total

1.  Corticospinal modulation induced by sounds depends on action preparedness.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; James R Tresilian; Aymar de Rugy; Simranjit Sidhu; Stephan Riek
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Corticospinal and spinal adaptations to motor skill and resistance training: Potential mechanisms and implications for motor rehabilitation and athletic development.

Authors:  Jamie Tallent; Alex Woodhead; Ashlyn K Frazer; Jessica Hill; Dawson J Kidgell; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Differential plasticity of extensor and flexor motor cortex representations following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  L Quinn; A Miljevic; B K Rurak; W Marinovic; Ann-Maree Vallence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cortical effects of repetitive finger flexion- vs. extension-resisted tracking movements: a TMS study.

Authors:  Sasha B Godfrey; Peter S Lum; Evan Chan; Michelle L Harris-Love
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Anodal-tDCS applied during unilateral strength training increases strength and corticospinal excitability in the untrained homologous muscle.

Authors:  Ashlee M Hendy; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The corticospinal responses of metronome-paced, but not self-paced strength training are similar to motor skill training.

Authors:  Michael Leung; Timo Rantalainen; Wei-Peng Teo; Dawson Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  The ipsilateral corticospinal responses to cross-education are dependent upon the motor-training intervention.

Authors:  Michael Leung; Timo Rantalainen; Wei-Peng Teo; Dawson Kidgell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of acute resistance training modality on corticospinal excitability, intra-cortical and neuromuscular responses.

Authors:  Christopher Latella; Wei-Peng Teo; Dale Harris; Brendan Major; Dan VanderWesthuizen; Ashlee M Hendy
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Auditory rhythmic cueing in movement rehabilitation: findings and possible mechanisms.

Authors:  Rebecca S Schaefer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Cross-education of wrist extensor strength is not influenced by non-dominant training in right-handers.

Authors:  Timothy A Coombs; Ashlyn K Frazer; Deanna M Horvath; Alan J Pearce; Glyn Howatson; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.