Literature DB >> 2158114

The biologic behavior of hydroxyapatite implanted into the maxillofacial skeleton.

H M Rosen1, M M McFarland.   

Abstract

Eleven patients who previously had undergone elective facial osteotomy and in whom blocks of porous hydroxyapatite were implanted into osteotomy gaps later consented to open biopsy of the implant material. A total of 24 biopsies were harvested at a mean time of 10.2 months following implantation. Gross anatomic findings were recorded at the time of biopsy. Specimens were harvested from the zygomatic buttress of the maxilla (12), the piriform buttress of the maxilla (4), the maxillary interdental premolar region (2), and the anterior mandible (6). Histologic sections were examined undecalcified using a modified trichrome stain. Eight of the 11 patients were followed radiographically for a minimum of 24 months. In the absence of infection, there was rapid fibrovascular ingrowth and, provided there was contact with host bone, bone ingrowth. This was observed in 21 of 24 biopsy specimens. The extent of bone ingrowth, as judged qualitatively, was highly variable and did not correlate with the time interval from implantation, anatomic site, or surface area of bone-implant interface. A healing process involving an osteoid phase of bone maturation and suggestive of continued net bone production was consistently found. The gross anatomic, radiographic, and histologic findings are discussed and provide further insight into the biologic behavior of porous block hydroxyapatite implanted into the maxillofacial skeleton.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2158114     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199005000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  9 in total

1.  [Porous orbital implants].

Authors:  B Cleres; H W Meyer-Rüsenberg
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Ceramic and non-ceramic hydroxyapatite as a bone graft material: a brief review.

Authors:  S R Dutta; D Passi; P Singh; A Bhuibhar
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  The fate of porous hydroxyapatite granules used in facial skeletal augmentation.

Authors:  Bryan C Mendelson; Steve R Jacobson; Alain M Lavoipierre; Richard J Huggins
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Performance of coralline hydroxyapatite in sinus floor augmentation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhi-Bin Luo; Qing-Bin Zhang; Zhao-Qiang Zhang; Dan Chen; Wang-Xiang Yan; Ke-Feng Li; Yu Chen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Bone healing in porous implants: a histological and histometrical comparative study on sheep.

Authors:  Y L Liu; J Schoenaers; K Groot Kd; J R Wijn; E Schepers
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  The efficacy of acrylic acid grafting and arginine-glycine-aspartic acid peptide immobilization on fibrovascular ingrowth into porous polyethylene implants in rabbits.

Authors:  Byung Woo Park; Hee Seok Yang; Se Hyun Baek; Kwideok Park; Dong Keun Han; Tae Soo Lee
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Biomimetic strategies for bone repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Maria G Raucci; Vincenzo Guarino; Luigi Ambrosio
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2012-09-20

8.  In vivo evaluation of a novel nanocomposite porous 3D scaffold in a rabbit model: histological analysis.

Authors:  Saffanah Khuder Mahmood; Intan-Shameha Abdul Razak; Mustafa Saddam Ghaji; Loqman Mohamed Yusof; Zaid Khudhur Mahmood; Mohd Adha Bin P Rameli; Zuki Abu Bakar Zakaria
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-12-01

9.  Aesthetic Enhancement of the Brow using Hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Lennert Minelli; Jacqueline Richa; Bryan C Mendelson
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.708

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.