Literature DB >> 24940487

Comparison of outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma in patients with surgically treated stage I-II cervical cancer.

Makoto Yamauchi1, Takeshi Fukuda1, Takuma Wada1, Masaru Kawanishi1, Kenji Imai1, Yasunori Hashiguchi1, Tomoyuki Ichimura1, Tomoyo Yasui1, Toshiyuki Sumi1.   

Abstract

To improve our understanding of cervical adenocarcinoma (AD) and evaluate the clinical and pathological variables affecting its prognosis, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 455 patients with cervical cancer [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I/II; 91 cases with AD and 364 with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)] who underwent surgery at our hospital between January, 1995 and August, 2012 and compared the characteristics and prognoses between AD and SCC cases, including age, clinical stage, histological type, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), cervical stromal invasion, parametrial invasion, vaginal invasion, corpus invasion, ovarian metastasis and tumor diameter. We used Cox regression analysis to determine independent prognostic factors. AD was found to have a significantly poorer prognosis in all the patients (P=0.001), stage I patients (P=0.001) and stage IB patients (P<0.05). The prognosis did not differ in patients who did not require postoperative treatment; however, patients who received postoperative treatment exhibited a significantly poorer prognosis (P<0.05). Patients with AD who received postoperative irradiation alone had a significantly poorer prognosis (P<0.05). The multivariate analysis identified LVSI (P=0.008), stromal invasion (P=0.024) and ovarian metastasis (P=0.032) as independent predictors of shorter survival. AD was associated with a worse prognosis compared to SCC in patients with stage IB disease, particularly in those who required postoperative treatment. Such patients may benefit from individualized postoperative treatments that differ from those applied for SCC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adenocarcinoma; cervical carcinoma; prognosis; squamous cell carcinoma

Year:  2014        PMID: 24940487      PMCID: PMC4051565          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2014.295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  25 in total

1.  A comparison of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  M P Hopkins; G W Morley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  ThinPrep detection of cervical and endometrial adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  John O Schorge; M Hossein Saboorian; Linda Hynan; Raheela Ashfaq
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-12-25       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  What is the difference between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix? A matched case-control study.

Authors:  K Bm Lee; J M Lee; C Y Park; K B Lee; H Y Cho; S Y Ha
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Identification of prognostic factors and risk groups in patients found to have nodal metastasis at the time of radical hysterectomy for early-stage squamous carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  R D Alvarez; S J Soong; W K Kinney; G C Reid; M F Schray; K C Podratz; G W Morley; H M Shingleton
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Prognosis of the adenocarcinoma of the cervix uteri: a comparative study.

Authors:  W Kleine; K Rau; D Schwoeorer; A Pfleiderer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  A comparison of prognoses of FIGO stage IB adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  A Ayhan; R A Al; C Baykal; E Demirtas; K Yüce; A Ayhan
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.437

7.  Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical hysterectomy for patients with stage IB and IIA cervical cancer.

Authors:  A P Soisson; J T Soper; D L Clarke-Pearson; A Berchuck; G Montana; W T Creasman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  p16 immunoreactivity may assist in the distinction between endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  W G McCluggage; D Jenkins
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 9.  Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence.

Authors:  H M Goodman; C A Buttlar; J M Niloff; W R Welch; A Marck; E J Feuer; E A Lahman; E L Jenison; R C Knapp
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I-IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  T Kasamatsu; T Onda; M Sawada; T Kato; S Ikeda; Y Sasajima; H Tsuda
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

1.  Gastric-type Mucinous Carcinoma with an Abnormal Increase of CA199: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Xue-Qian Qian; Fen-Fen Wang; Yun Liang; Li-Li Chen; Xiao-Yun Wan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-04

2.  Analysis of related risk factors of lung metastasis after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Liu Henglian; Wang Jiajun; Wang Caixia; Lu Gang; Xia Min
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Prognostic effect of different PD-L1 expression patterns in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  A Marijne Heeren; Simone Punt; Maaike Cg Bleeker; Katja N Gaarenstroom; Jacobus van der Velden; Gemma G Kenter; Tanja D de Gruijl; Ekaterina S Jordanova
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Schwann Cell-Derived CCL2 Promotes the Perineural Invasion of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Ting Huang; Qiong Fan; Yiwei Wang; Yunxia Cui; Zhihua Wang; Linlin Yang; Xiao Sun; Yudong Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Molecular Differences between Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma Cervical Cancer Subtypes: Potential Prognostic Biomarkers.

Authors:  Alma D Campos-Parra; Milagros Pérez-Quintanilla; Antonio Daniel Martínez-Gutierrez; Delia Pérez-Montiel; Jaime Coronel-Martínez; Oliver Millan-Catalan; David Cantú De León; Carlos Pérez-Plasencia
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Biology and treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Satoshi Takeuchi
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Characteristics of cervical disease among symptomatic women with histopathological sample at Hawassa University referral hospital, Southern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Gemechu Ameya; Fekade Yerakly
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Comparison of survival outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix after radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ping Liu; Mei Ji; Yanxiang Kong; Zhifeng Huo; Qiubo Lv; Qinghuang Xie; Danbo Wang; Biliang Chen; Hailin Wang; Zhumei Cui; Qianqing Wang; Xiaonong Bin; Jinghe Lang; Chunlin Chen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.