Literature DB >> 16884367

What is the difference between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix? A matched case-control study.

K Bm Lee1, J M Lee, C Y Park, K B Lee, H Y Cho, S Y Ha.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of treatment strategies in patients with adenocarcinoma (AC) of the cervix and compare it with those with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix. Women with FIGO (1994) stage IB1 AC, especially pathologic tumor size of 2-4 cm, treated with class III hysterectomy, were compared with those with SCC treated with comparable strategy in a case-controlled study. Eighty patients (20 cases, 60 controls) were analyzed. Lymphvascular space invasion (P = 0.01) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.07) were more frequent in patients with SCC than in those with AC. However, there was no significant difference in depth of stromal invasion (P = 0.51) and invasion of the parametrium (P = 0.44) between two groups. And there was also no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (P = 0.86) and overall survival (P = 0.89) between two groups. Primary radical surgery followed by adjuvant therapy, same as for SCC, would be acceptable for AC with pathologic tumor size of 2-4 cm. Although it was difficult to determine whether AC recurred more systemically, more effective treatment strategies than those currently available for AC should be considered to reduce the systemic recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16884367     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00628.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  19 in total

1.  A comparison of the prognosis between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xiuzhen Xie; Kun Song; Baoxia Cui; Jie Jiang; Xingsheng Yang; Beihua Kong
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Outcomes after radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix.

Authors:  J-Y Park; D-Y Kim; J-H Kim; Y-M Kim; Y-T Kim; J-H Nam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Comparison of outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma in patients with surgically treated stage I-II cervical cancer.

Authors:  Makoto Yamauchi; Takeshi Fukuda; Takuma Wada; Masaru Kawanishi; Kenji Imai; Yasunori Hashiguchi; Tomoyuki Ichimura; Tomoyo Yasui; Toshiyuki Sumi
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-15

4.  High expression of CRAM correlates with poor prognosis in patients with cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Teng Hou; Dongxia Liang; Dong Yang; Jiehua He; Yongwen Huang; Yanna Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-02-15

5.  Extrafascial hysterectomy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Keng Shen; Jinhui Wang; Jiaxin Yang; Dongyan Cao
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Different effects of H2O2 treatment on cervical squamous carcinoma cells and adenocarcinoma cells.

Authors:  Peihai Zhang; Haiqin Yin; Sie Wang; Yuping Wei; Nan Peng; Wenxiang Bi; Xiaoyuan Wang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  Comparative transcriptomes of adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas reveal molecular similarities that span classical anatomic boundaries.

Authors:  Eric W Lin; Tatiana A Karakasheva; Dong-Jin Lee; Ju-Seog Lee; Qi Long; Adam J Bass; Kwok K Wong; Anil K Rustgi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Prediction of 5-year overall survival in cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy using computational intelligence methods.

Authors:  Bogdan Obrzut; Maciej Kusy; Andrzej Semczuk; Marzanna Obrzut; Jacek Kluska
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I-IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  T Kasamatsu; T Onda; M Sawada; T Kato; S Ikeda; Y Sasajima; H Tsuda
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Multivariate prognostic analysis of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kato; Hidemichi Watari; Mahito Takeda; Masayoshi Hosaka; Takashi Mitamura; Noriko Kobayashi; Satoko Sudo; Masanori Kaneuchi; Masataka Kudo; Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.