Literature DB >> 2030867

A comparison of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

M P Hopkins1, G W Morley.   

Abstract

A comparison and survival analysis of 203 patients (21%) with adenocarcinoma and 756 (79%) with squamous cell cancer of the cervix for the time period 1970-1985 is reported. The mean number of new cases of adenocarcinoma (N = 12) remained the same, while squamous cell cases decreased from 57 to 32. The clinical features were compared; oral contraceptive usage, node status, diabetes, and symptoms of bleeding were not related to cell type. Nulliparity was more frequent in patients with adenocarcinoma, whereas obesity and smoking were more frequent in patients with squamous cell cancer. Survival in stage I was significantly influenced by the cell type. Patients with stage I squamous cell disease had a 90% 5-year survival, compared with 60% for adenocarcinoma (P less than .0001). Other features that influenced survival included node status (P = .001), poor differentiation of tumor histology (P = .001), diabetes (P = .001), and Papanicolaou smear interval (P = .001). Patients undergoing radical hysterectomy were analyzed separately, and adenocarcinoma cell type significantly influenced survival (P = .0008). Patients with stage II squamous cell disease had a 62% survival, compared with 47% for adenocarcinoma (P = .01); patients with stage III squamous cell disease had a 36% survival, compared with 8% for adenocarcinoma (P = .002). The percentage of adenocarcinoma has increased because of the decreased number of patients with squamous cell disease. Stage-for-stage survival is significantly decreased for patients with adenocarcinoma as opposed to squamous cell disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2030867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  31 in total

1.  Increased expression of iASPP correlates with poor prognosis in FIGO IA2-IIA cervical adenocarcinoma following a curative resection.

Authors:  Fanming Kong; Xiaofeng Shi; Huzi Li; Pu Li; Jianchun Yu; XiaoJiang Li; Jun Chen; Yiyu Sun; Yingjie Jia
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Apoptosis Phenomena in Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Adenocarcinomas of the Uterine Cervix.

Authors:  Mariana Gamba De Paula Eduardo; Adriana Bittencourt Campaner; Maria Antonieta Longo Galvão Silva
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  A comparison of the prognosis between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xiuzhen Xie; Kun Song; Baoxia Cui; Jie Jiang; Xingsheng Yang; Beihua Kong
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Adenocarcinoma of the cervix: should we treat it differently?

Authors:  Ned L Williams; Theresa L Werner; Elke A Jarboe; David K Gaffney
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  A pilot study of oxaliplatin with oral S-1 as second-line chemotherapy for patients with recurrent adenocarcimona of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Eriko Takatori; Tadahiro Shoji; Yasuko Suga; Hanae Niinuma; Yuki Miura; Yoshitaka Kaido; Anna Takada; Masahiro Kagabu; Satoshi Takeuchi; Toru Sugiyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Outcomes after radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix.

Authors:  J-Y Park; D-Y Kim; J-H Kim; Y-M Kim; Y-T Kim; J-H Nam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  p16INK4A positivity in benign, premalignant and malignant cervical glandular lesions: a potential diagnostic problem.

Authors:  N Murphy; C C B B Heffron; B King; U G Ganuguapati; M Ring; E McGuinness; O Sheils; J J O'Leary
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2004-09-18       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Comparison of outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma in patients with surgically treated stage I-II cervical cancer.

Authors:  Makoto Yamauchi; Takeshi Fukuda; Takuma Wada; Masaru Kawanishi; Kenji Imai; Yasunori Hashiguchi; Tomoyuki Ichimura; Tomoyo Yasui; Toshiyuki Sumi
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-15

Review 9.  Fertility-Sparing Options in Young Women with Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Federica Tomao; Giacomo Corrado; Fedro Alessandro Peccatori; Sara Boveri; Eleonora Petra Preti; Nicoletta Colombo; Fabio Landoni
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-01

10.  Reproductive variables and risk of uterine cervical cancer in Norwegian registry data.

Authors:  T Bjørge; O Kravdal
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.