| Literature DB >> 24938316 |
Marzanna Hęś1, Krzysztof Dziedzic, Danuta Górecka, Agnieszka Drożdżyńska, Elżbieta Gujska.
Abstract
In recent years, there has been an ever-increasing interest in the research of polyphenols obtained from dietary sources, and their antioxidative properties. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of boiling buckwheat and barley groats on the antioxidant properties and dietary fiber composition. Antioxidative properties were investigated using methyl linoleate model system, by assessing the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radical scavenging activity and metal chelating activity. The results were compared with butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). Raw barley and buckwheat groats extracts showed higher DPPH scavenging ability compared to boiled barley and buckwheat groats extracts. Raw barley groats extract exhibited higher antioxidant activity than boiled groats extract in the methyl linoleate emulsion. Higher chelating ability in relation to Fe (II) ions was observed for boiled groats extracts as compared to raw groats extracts. BHT showed small antiradical activity and metal chelating activity, while showing higher antioxidative activity in emulsion system. The analysis of groats extracts using HPLC method showed the presence of rutin, catechin, quercetin, gallic, p-hydroxybenzoic, p-coumaric, o-coumaric, vanillic, sinapic, and ferulic acids. Differences in the content of dietary fiber and its fractions were observed in the examined products. The highest total dietary fiber content was detected in boiled buckwheat groats, while the lowest - in boiled barley groats. The scientific achievements of this research could help consumers to choose those cereal products available on the market, such as barley and buckwheat groats, which are a rich source of antioxidative compounds and dietary fiber.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24938316 PMCID: PMC4149880 DOI: 10.1007/s11130-014-0425-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Foods Hum Nutr ISSN: 0921-9668 Impact factor: 3.921
Total phenolic content in groats extracts
| Sample | Total phenolic (mg CE*/kg DM extract) |
|---|---|
| Raw barley groats | 6800 ± 50b |
| Boiled barley groats | 6100 ± 70a |
| Raw buckwheat groats | 9200 ± 100c |
| Boiled buckwheat groats | 13500 ± 120d |
* CE - catechin equivalents; different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Mean values ± SD (n = 3)
Polyphenol content in groats extracts
| Phenolics substances (mg/kg DM extract) | Raw buckwheat groats | Boiled buckwheat groats | Raw barley groats | Boiled barley groats |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutin | 69.95 ± 2.25a | 70.48 ± 3.27a | nd | nd |
| Catechin | 46.47 ± 0.17a | 62.12 ± 6.04b | 1312.47 ± 7.11c | 1321.58 ± 6.20c |
| Quercetin | 1.67 ± 0.03a | 1.48 ± 0.16a | nd | nd |
|
| 7.26 ± 0.11b | 0.91 ± 0.02a | 42.16 ± 1.10c | 49.61 ± 1.75d |
|
| nd | nd | 28.29 ± 1.25a | 29.94 ± 1.15a |
| Vanillic acid | nd | nd | 4.77 ± 0.11a | 4.76 ± 0.09a |
| Sinapic acid | nd | nd | 19.23 ± 1.53b | 15.62 ± 1.25a |
| Ferulic acid | nd | nd | 84.92 ± 2.30a | 87.37 ± 2.15a |
|
| 22.06 ± 1.55 | nd | nd | nd |
| Gallic acid | 3.83 ± 0.08a | 4.08 ± 0.10a | nd | nd |
nd – not detected; different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Mean values ± SD (n = 3)
Fig. 1The DPPH scavenging of groats extracts. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Mean values ± SD (n = 4)
Fig. 2Antioxidant activity of groats extracts in methyl linoleate emulsion. AEC – Antioxidant efficiency coefficient. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Mean values ± SD (n = 4)
Fig. 3The chelating activity of groats extracts. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Mean values ± SD (n = 4)
Content of TDF, NDF and its fractions
| Fraction of dietary fiber (g/100 g product) | Raw buckwheat groats | Boiled buckwheat groats | Raw barley groats | Boiled barley groats |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total dietary fiber | ||||
| TDF | 12.18 ± 0.24b | 16.45 ± 0.26d | 13.21 ± 0.39c | 7.99 ± 0.36a |
| IDF | 9.97 ± 0.22c | 13.10 ± 0.16d | 8.65 ± 0.34b | 5.19 ± 0.17a |
| SDF | 2.21 ± 0.02a | 3.35 ± 0.22c | 4.56 ± 0.09d | 2.80 ± 0.14b |
| Neutral dietary fiber | ||||
| NDF | 10.00 ± 0.72c | 11.26 ± 0.47c | 7.06 ± 0.07b | 4.22 ± 0.40a |
| C | 0.67 ± 0.12a | 2.34 ± 0.54b | 4.00 ± 0.26c | 0.78 ± 0.37a |
| H | 6.94 ± 0.61b | 2.69 ± 0.61a | 2.84 ± 0.33a | 3.31 ± 0.07a |
| L | 2.39 ± 0.01b | 6.24 ± 0.23c | 0.22 ± 0.14a | 0.12 ± 0.02a |
TDF – total dietary fiber; IDF - insoluble dietary fiber; SDF - soluble dietary fiber; NDF- neutral detergent fiber; C - cellulose; H - hemicellulose; L – lignin; different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Mean values ± SD (n = 3)