Karen E Huang1, Brandy-Joe Milliron1, Scott A Davis1, Steven R Feldman1. 1. From the Departments of Dermatology, Public Health Sciences, Pathology, andSocial Sciences and Health Policy, Center for Dermatology Research, Wake Forest School of Medicine; Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In light of the growing medical interest in the potential consequences of vitamin D deficiency, it is important that clinicians are informed about the varying factors that may complicate the assessment of vitamin D status and the diagnosis of deficiency. To better understand the frequency of vitamin D deficiency diagnoses in the ambulatory setting over time, the objective of this investigation was to examine unspecific, general, and bone-related vitamin D deficiency diagnoses between 2007 and 2010 and to determine whether the rate of diagnoses differed by patient age and sex. METHODS: We used data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to assess the rate of vitamin D deficiency diagnoses provided between 2007 and 2010 during outpatient visits with nonfederally employed physicians in offices and hospitals. Two hundred ninety-two unweighted patient visit records were included. Trends in vitamin D deficiency diagnosis over time, diagnosis of bone disease associated with a vitamin D deficiency diagnosis, and patient age and sex were reported. RESULTS: The number of diagnoses for vitamin D deficiency rapidly increased from 2007 to 2010. More than 97% of diagnoses were for unspecific vitamin D deficiency; 9.6% of vitamin D deficiency visits also resulted in a diagnosis of osteoporosis or bone fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Although the rate of diagnoses for vitamin D deficiency increased between 2007 and 2010, many diagnoses rendered were for nonspecific disease; therefore, vitamin D deficiency screening may have been ordered for preventive care purposes rather than as a diagnostic aid.
OBJECTIVES: In light of the growing medical interest in the potential consequences of vitamin D deficiency, it is important that clinicians are informed about the varying factors that may complicate the assessment of vitamin D status and the diagnosis of deficiency. To better understand the frequency of vitamin D deficiency diagnoses in the ambulatory setting over time, the objective of this investigation was to examine unspecific, general, and bone-related vitamin D deficiency diagnoses between 2007 and 2010 and to determine whether the rate of diagnoses differed by patient age and sex. METHODS: We used data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to assess the rate of vitamin D deficiency diagnoses provided between 2007 and 2010 during outpatient visits with nonfederally employed physicians in offices and hospitals. Two hundred ninety-two unweighted patient visit records were included. Trends in vitamin D deficiency diagnosis over time, diagnosis of bone disease associated with a vitamin D deficiency diagnosis, and patient age and sex were reported. RESULTS: The number of diagnoses for vitamin D deficiency rapidly increased from 2007 to 2010. More than 97% of diagnoses were for unspecific vitamin D deficiency; 9.6% of vitamin Ddeficiency visits also resulted in a diagnosis of osteoporosis or bone fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Although the rate of diagnoses for vitamin D deficiency increased between 2007 and 2010, many diagnoses rendered were for nonspecific disease; therefore, vitamin D deficiency screening may have been ordered for preventive care purposes rather than as a diagnostic aid.
Authors: V J Woeckel; R D A M Alves; S M A Swagemakers; M Eijken; H Chiba; B C J van der Eerden; J P T M van Leeuwen Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Helen J Binns; David Lanier; Wilson D Pace; James M Galliher; Theodore G Ganiats; Margaret Grey; Adolfo J Ariza; Robert Williams Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Thomas J Wang; Michael J Pencina; Sarah L Booth; Paul F Jacques; Erik Ingelsson; Katherine Lanier; Emelia J Benjamin; Ralph B D'Agostino; Myles Wolf; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rosemary L Schleicher; Maya R Sternberg; David A Lacher; Christopher T Sempos; Anne C Looker; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu; Elizabeth A Yetley; Madhulika Chaudhary-Webb; Khin L Maw; Christine M Pfeiffer; Clifford L Johnson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 7.045