| Literature DB >> 24934666 |
Michael Veitinger, Balazs Varga, Sheila B Guterres, Maria Zellner1.
Abstract
Peripheral biomarkers play an indispensable role in quick and reliable diagnoses of any kind of disease. With the population ageing, the number of people suffering from age-related diseases is expected to rise dramatically over the coming decades. In particular, all types of cognitive deficits, such as Alzheimer's disease, will increase. Alzheimer's disease is characterised mainly by coexistence of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in brain. Reliable identification of such molecular characteristics antemortem, however, is problematic due to restricted availability of appropriate sample material and definitive diagnosis is only possible postmortem. Currently, the best molecular biomarkers available for antemortem diagnosis originate from cerebrospinal fluid. Though, this is not convenient for routine diagnosis because of the required invasive lumbar puncture. As a consequence, there is a growing demand for additional peripheral biomarkers in a more readily accessible sample material. Blood platelets, due to shared biochemical properties with neurons, can constitute an attractive alternative as discussed here. This review summarises potential platelet Alzheimer's disease biomarkers, their role, implication, and alteration in the disease. For easy comparison of their performance, the Hedge effect size was calculated whenever data were available.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24934666 PMCID: PMC4229876 DOI: 10.1186/2051-5960-2-65
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun ISSN: 2051-5960 Impact factor: 7.801
Figure 1Overview of potential peripheral platelet AD biomarkers. Besides key players involved in the generation of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, a good many additional AD-specific platelet alterations have been described. APP, amyloid precursor protein; GSK3β, glycogen synthase kinase 3β; Mao-B, monoamine oxidase B; NO, nitric oxide; ONOO−, peroxynitrite.
Comparison of platelet AD biomarker performance by Hedge effect size
| AD platelet biomarkers | Reg. AD | AD | Hedge ES | Controls | Pubmed ID | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Age | MMSE | MMSE | Age |
| ||||
|
|
| 10 | 75 ± 8 | 16 ± 5 |
| 27 ± 2 | 76 ± 7 | 8 | [ |
|
|
| 11 | 76 ± 8 | 13 ± 5 |
| 27 ± 2 | 76 ± 7 | 8 | [ |
|
|
| 9 | 75 ± 8 | 1 ± 2 |
| 27 ± 2 | 76 ± 7 | 9 | [ |
|
|
| 20 | 78 ± 5 | 17 ± 4 |
| 29 ± 1 | 76 ± 5 | 18 | [ |
|
|
| 20 | 78 ± 5 | 17 ± 4 |
| 29 ± 1 | 76 ± 5 | 18 | [ |
|
|
| 30 | 67 ± 10 | 25 ± 3 |
| 29 ± 1 | 68 ± 10 | 23 | [ |
|
|
| 30 | 67 ± 10 | 25 ± 3 |
| 29 ± 1 | 68 ± 10 | 23 | [ |
|
|
| 12 | 71 ± 2 | 28 ± 2 |
| 29 ± 2 | 70 ± 6 | 10* | [ |
|
|
| 33 | 68 ± 6 | 18 ± 4 |
| 29 ± 1 | 63 ± 6 | 26 | [ |
|
|
| 32 | 72 ± 10 | 13 ± 7 |
| 28 ± 4 | 68 ± 14 | 25 | [ |
|
|
| 85 | 68 ± 0 | 14 ± 7 |
| 29 ± 2 | n.a. | 24 | [ |
|
|
| 23 | 74 ± 9 | 19 ± 5 |
| 29 ± 1 | 70 ± 6 | 29 | [ |
|
|
| 66 | 77 ± 10 | 14 ± 8 |
| 29 ± 1 | 73 ± 11 | 46 | [ |
|
|
| 15 | n.a | n.a |
| n.a | n.a | 19 | [ |
|
|
| 20 | 70 ± 10 | 19 ± 4 |
| 28 ± 2 | 70 ± 10 | 10 | [ |
|
|
| 86 | 80 ± 7 | 18 ± 5 |
| 29 ± 1 | 79 ± 8 | 115 | [ |
|
|
| 52* | 76 | 25 ± 1 |
| 30 | 74 | 75 | [ |
|
|
| 15 | 82 ± 5 | 19 ± 6 |
| 29 ± 1 | 80 ± 5 | 12 | [ |
|
|
| 100 | 68 ± 7 | n.a. |
| n.a. | 65 ± 9 | 50 | [ |
|
|
| 60 | 72 ± 7 | 18 ± 2 |
| 29 ± 1 | 70 ± 8 | 25 | [ |
|
|
| 40 | 66 ± 5 | 18 ± 3 |
| 29 ± 2 | 63 ± 4 | 25 | [ |
|
|
| 10 | n.a. | < 20 |
| n.a. | n.a. | 19 | [ |
|
|
| 36* | 74 ± 8 | 28 ± 1 |
| 28 ± 1 | 73 ± 8.8 | 30* | [ |
|
|
| 20 | 72 ± 10 | 23 ± 2 |
| 30 ± 0 | 74 ± 7 | 40 | [ |
|
|
| 10 | <60 | n.a. |
| n.a | 61 ± 3 | 5 | [ |
|
|
| 10 | >60 | n.a. |
| n.a | 61 ± 3 | 5 | [ |
|
|
| 20 | 65 ± 9 | 18 ± 5 |
| n.a. | 63 ± 9 | 20 | [ |
|
|
| 22 | 66 ± 9 | 17 ± 8 |
| 26 ± 3 | 63 ± 9 | 20 | [ |
|
|
| 6 | n.a. | n.a. |
| n.a. | n.a. | 8 | [ |
|
|
| 8 | 78 ± 7 | 17 ± 7 |
| 30 ± 1 | 73 ± 5.7 | 7 | [ |
|
|
| 5* | 78 ± 10 | 26 ± 2 |
| 30 ± 1 | 73 ± 5.7 | 7 | [ |
|
|
| 24 | 76 ± 4 | 19 ± 4 |
| 28 ± 3 | 71 ± 5 | 23 | [ |
|
|
| 22* | 74 ± 7 | 26 ± 2 |
| 28 ± 3 | 71 ± 5 | 23 | [ |
|
|
| 19 | 71 ± 5 | n.a. |
| n.a. | 61 ± 8 | 14 | [ |
|
|
| 25 | 78 ± 1 | 21 ± 1 |
| 28 ± 0 | 71 ± 2 | 26 | [ |
|
|
| 20 | 81 ± 11 | 5 ± 7 |
| 28 ± 1 | 80 ± 11 | 9 | [ |
|
|
| 15 | 68 ± 3 | n.a. |
| n.a. | 54 ± 2 | 8 | [ |
|
|
| 50 | 68 ± 14 | n.a. |
| n.a. | 64 ± 14 | 50 | [ |
|
|
| 11 | 65 ± 1 | n.a. |
| n.a. | 65 | 11 | [ |
|
|
| 11 | 64 ± 7 | 14 ± 4 |
| n.a. | 64 ± 8 | 11 | [ |
|
|
| 34 | 79 ± 8 | 5 ± 4 |
| 28 ± 2 | 79 ± 9 | 34 | [ |
|
|
| 126 | 76 ± 7 | n.a. |
| n.a. | 75 ± 6 | 286 | [ |
|
|
| 12 | 72 ± 4 | 11 ± 2 |
| n.a. | 68 ± 4.5 | 18 | [ |
|
|
| 23 | 74 ± 9 | 19 ± 5 |
| 29 ± 1 | 70 ± 5.8 | 29 | [ |
|
|
| 24 | n.a. | n.a. |
| n.a. | n.a. | 36 | [ |
|
|
| 100 | 68 ± 7 | n.a. |
| n.a. | 65 ± 9 | 50 | [ |
|
|
| 30 | n.a. | n.a. |
| n.a. | n.a. | 30 | [ |
|
|
| 100 | 68 ± 7 | n.a. |
| n.a. | 65 ± 9 | 50 | [ |
|
|
| 100 | 68 ± 7 | n.a. |
| n.a. | 65 ± 9 | 50 | [ |
|
|
| 60 | 72 ± 7 | 18 ± 2 |
| 29 ± 1 | 70 ± 8 | 25 | [ |
|
|
| 40 | 66 ± 5 | 18 ± 3 |
| 29 ± 2 | 63 ± 4 | 25 | [ |
|
|
| 100 | 68 ± 7 | n.a. |
| n.a. | 65 ± 9 | 50 | [ |
|
|
| 60 | 72 ± 7 | 18 ± 2 |
| 29 ± 1 | 70 ± 8 | 25 | [ |
|
|
| 40 | 66 ± 5 | 18 ± 3 |
| 29 ± 2 | 63 ± 4 | 25 | [ |
|
|
| 100 | 68 ± 7 | n.a. |
| n.a. | 65 ± 9 | 50 | [ |
|
|
| 60 | 72 ± 7 | 18 ± 2 |
| 29 ± 1 | 70 ± 8 | 25 | [ |
|
|
| 40 | 66 ± 5 | 18 ± 3 |
| 29 ± 2 | 63 ± 4 | 25 | [ |
|
|
| 16 | 70 ± 11 | n.a. |
| n.a. | 63 ± 10 | 13 | [ |
|
|
| 21 | 75 ± 7 | 14 ± 9 |
| 28 ± 2 | 73 ± 5 | 17 | [ |
|
|
| 11* | 73 ± 5 | 25 ± 4 |
| 28 ± 2 | 73 ± 5 | 17 | [ |
|
|
| 37 | 73 ± 6 | 19 ± 5 |
| n.a. | 72 ± 5 | 27 | [ |
|
|
| 44 | 75 ± 7 | 19 ± 5 |
| 28 ± 4 | 75 ± 7 | 66 | [ |
|
|
| 59* | 72 ± 6 | 27 ± 3 |
| 28 ± 4 | 75 ± 7 | 66 | [ |
|
|
| 10 | 81 ± 1 | 1 ± 2 |
| 1 ± 2 | 80 ± 2 | 10 | [ |
|
|
| 22 | n.a. | n.a. |
| n.a. | n.a. | 20 | [ |
|
|
| 57 | n.a. | n.a. |
| n.a. | n.a. | 20 | [ |
|
|
| 15 | 81 | 15 |
| 28 | 68 | 10 | [ |
|
|
| 23 | 70 ± 8 | n.a. |
| n.a. | 60 ± 10 | 17 | [ |
The Hedge effect size was calculated based on published values of mean, standard deviation, standard error of mean, and sample size. Positive ES indicate up-regulation, negative ES down-regulation in AD patients. aMild AD, bModerate AD, cAdvanced AD, *MCI.