Literature DB >> 24934180

Generating anatomical variation through mutations in networks - implications for evolution.

Jonathan Bard1.   

Abstract

Genetic mutation leads to anatomical variation only indirectly because many proteins involved in generating anatomical structures in embryos operate cooperatively within molecular networks. These include gene-regulatory or control networks (CNs) for timing, signaling and patterning together with the process networks (PNs) for proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation and morphogenesis that they control. This paper argues that anatomical variation is achieved through a two-stage process: mutation alters the outputs of CNs and perhaps the proliferation network, and such changed outputs alter the ways that PNs construct tissues. This systems-biology approach has several implications: first, because networks contain many cooperating proteins, they amplify the effects of genetic variation so enabling mutation to generate a wider range of phenotypes than a single changed protein acting alone could. Second, this amplification helps explain how novel phenotypes can be produced relatively rapidly. Third, because even organisms with novel anatomical phenotypes derive from variants in standard networks, there is no genetic barrier to their producing viable offspring. This approach also clarifies a terminological difficulty: classical evolutionary genetics views genes in terms of phenotype heritability rather than as DNA sequences. This paper suggests that the molecular phenotype of the classical concept of a gene is often a protein network, with a mutation leading to an alteration in that network's dynamics.
© 2014 Anatomical Society.

Keywords:  anatomical variation; evolution; molecular networks; mutation; systems biology; variation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24934180      PMCID: PMC4111923          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  47 in total

1.  The establishment of 'essential derivation' among rose varieties, using AFLP.

Authors:  Ben Vosman; Dirk Visser; Jeroen Rouppe van der Voort; Marinus J M Smulders; Fred van Eeuwijk
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 2.  Into the unknown--the death pathways in the neonatal gut epithelium.

Authors:  M M Godlewski; M Słupecka; J Woliński; T Skrzypek; H Skrzypek; T Motyl; R Zabielski
Journal:  J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.011

3.  Between "design" and "bricolage": genetic networks, levels of selection, and adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Adam S Wilkins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cell state switching factors and dynamical patterning modules: complementary mediators of plasticity in development and evolution.

Authors:  Stuart A Newman; Ramray Bhat; Nadejda V Mezentseva
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  A systems biology representation of developmental anatomy.

Authors:  Jonathan Bard
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  A theory of biological relativity: no privileged level of causation.

Authors:  Denis Noble
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 7.  Emerging properties of animal gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Eric H Davidson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Morphological diversity of the avian foot is related with the pattern of msx gene expression in the developing autopod.

Authors:  Y Gañan; D Macias; R D Basco; R Merino; J M Hurle
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  An analysis of skeletal development in osteoblast-specific and chondrocyte-specific runt-related transcription factor-2 (Runx2) knockout mice.

Authors:  Takeshi Takarada; Eiichi Hinoi; Ryota Nakazato; Hiroki Ochi; Cheng Xu; Azusa Tsuchikane; Shu Takeda; Gerard Karsenty; Takaya Abe; Hiroshi Kiyonari; Yukio Yoneda
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 have distinct differentiation- and proliferation-related roles in the developing mouse skull vault.

Authors:  S Iseki; A O Wilkie; G M Morriss-Kay
Journal:  Development       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.