Literature DB >> 2493388

Is there directional smelling?

G Kobal1, S Van Toller, T Hummel.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to establish the crucial precondition for directional smelling, i.e. the ability of humans to discriminate between odorous stimuli perceived either from the right or from the left side. When the 'pure' odorants hydrogen sulphide or vanillin were used as stimulants localization was random. On the other hand stimulation with carbon dioxide or menthol yielded identification rates of more than 96%. These results established the fact that directional orientation, considering single momentary odorous sensations, can only be assumed, when the olfactory stimulants simultaneously excite the trigeminal somatosensory system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2493388     DOI: 10.1007/bf01954845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Experientia        ISSN: 0014-4754


  7 in total

1.  [Objective olfactometry: methodological annotations for recording olfactory EEG-responses from the awake human].

Authors:  G Kobal; K H Plattig
Journal:  EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb       Date:  1978-09

2.  OLFACTORY ANALOGUE TO DIRECTIONAL HEARING.

Authors:  G VONBEKESY
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 3.531

Review 3.  Neural mechanisms for sound localization.

Authors:  R B Masterton; T J Imig
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 19.318

4.  Interaction between chemoreceptive modalities of odour and irritation.

Authors:  W S Cain; C L Murphy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-03-20       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans.

Authors:  R L Doty; W E Brugger; P C Jurs; M A Orndorff; P J Snyder; L D Lowry
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1978-02

6.  Pain-related electrical potentials of the human nasal mucosa elicited by chemical stimulation.

Authors:  G Kobal
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Cerebral chemosensory evoked potentials elicited by chemical stimulation of the human olfactory and respiratory nasal mucosa.

Authors:  G Kobal; C Hummel
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug
  7 in total
  42 in total

1.  Stimulus selection for intranasal sensory isolation: eugenol is an irritant.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; Charles J Wysocki; Johan N Lundström
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  From chemosensory thresholds to whole body exposures-experimental approaches evaluating chemosensory effects of chemicals.

Authors:  Christoph van Thriel; Michael Schäper; Ernst Kiesswetter; Stefan Kleinbeck; Stephanie Juran; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Hajo-Hennig Fricke; Lilo Altmann; Hans Berresheim; Thomas Brüning
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Do the blinds smell better?

Authors:  Jan Christoffer Luers; Stefanie Mikolajczak; Moritz Hahn; Claus Wittekindt; Dirk Beutner; Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink; Michael Damm
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Unilateral reduced sense of smell is an early indicator for global olfactory loss.

Authors:  Volker Gudziol; Irene Paech; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-01-03       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Stereo and serial sniffing guide navigation to an odour source in a mammal.

Authors:  Kenneth C Catania
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Trigeminal induced arousals during human sleep.

Authors:  Clemens Heiser; Jan Baja; Franziska Lenz; J Ulrich Sommer; Karl Hörmann; Raphael M Herr; Boris A Stuck
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  Perception of specific trigeminal chemosensory agonists.

Authors:  J Frasnelli; J Albrecht; B Bryant; J N Lundström
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 8.  Human olfaction: a constant state of change-blindness.

Authors:  Lee Sela; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Chemosensory loss: functional consequences of the world trade center disaster.

Authors:  Pamela H Dalton; Richard E Opiekun; Michele Gould; Ryan McDermott; Tamika Wilson; Christopher Maute; Mehmet H Ozdener; Kai Zhao; Edward Emmett; Peter S J Lees; Robin Herbert; Jacqueline Moline
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Kallmann's syndrome and chemosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  T Hummel; H Pietsch; G Kobal
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.