| Literature DB >> 24932729 |
Oswaldo Cruz Neto1, Antonio V Aguiar2, Alex D Twyford3, Linda E Neaves3, R Toby Pennington3, Ariadna V Lopes1.
Abstract
Planting of native trees for habitat restoration is a widespread practice, but the consequences for the retention and transmission of genetic diversity in planted and natural populations are unclear. Using Inga vera subsp. affinis as a model species, we genotyped five natural and five planted populations in the Atlantic forest of northeastern Brazil at polymorphic microsatellite loci. We studied the breeding system and population structure to test how much genetic diversity is retained in planted relative to natural populations. We then genotyped seedlings from these populations to test whether genetic diversity in planted populations is restored by outcrossing to natural populations of I. vera. The breeding system of natural I. vera populations was confirmed to be highly outcrossing (t = 0.92; FIS = -0.061, P = 0.04), with populations showing weak population substructure (FST = 0.028). Genetic diversity in planted populations was 50% less than that of natural populations (planted: AR = 14.9, HO = 0.865 and natural: AR = 30.8, HO = 0.655). However, seedlings from planted populations showed a 30% higher allelic richness relative to their parents (seedlings AR = 10.5, parents AR = 7.6). Understanding the processes and interactions that shape this system are necessary to provide ecologically sensible goals and successfully restore hyper-fragmented habitats. Future restoration plans for I. vera must consider the genetic diversity of planted populations and the potential for gene flow between natural populations in the landscape, in order to preserve ecological interactions (i.e. pollination), and promote opportunities for outcrossing.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24932729 PMCID: PMC4059660 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099903
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Location of the study area.
(A) Map of South America highlighting northeastern region of Brazil and original extent of Atlantic rain forest; (B) Original and remaining distribution of the Atlantic rain forest between Alagoas (AL) and Pernambuco (PE) states; (C) Study site map highlighting remnants of the Atlantic rain forest, Inga plantations, and urban areas.
Genetic diversity per locus in adults and seedlings of Inga vera in planted and natural populations.
| Locus | Reference | Ta (°C) | Range (bp) |
|
|
|
|
| Hollingsworth et al. 2005 | 56 | 58–90 | 0.841 | 0.807 | 0.015 |
|
| Hollingsworth et al. 2005 | 56 | 130–174 | 0.658 | 0.78 | 0.052 |
|
| Hollingsworth et al. 2005 | 62 | 216–244 | 0.583 | 0.803 | 0.078 |
|
| Dayanandan et al. 1997 | 62 | 179–215 | 0.807 | 0.758 | 0.072 |
Locus name, reference of the primers, annealing temperature (Ta), range (bp) of the amplified fragments, observed (H) and expected (H) heterozygosity, and genetic differentiation coefficient (F). The primers Inga03 and Inga33 were labelled with 6-FAM while the primers Inga08 and Pel05 were labelled with NED and PET, respectively.
Genetic diversity per population of adults and seedlings of Inga vera in planted and natural stands.
| Populations | Adults | Seedlings | ||||
| A |
|
| A |
|
| |
| Planted | ||||||
| P1 | 4.3 | 3.62 | 0.612 | 6 | 3.96 | 0.684 |
| P2 | 4.8 | 3.98 | 0.698 | 5.75 | 5.35 | 0.811 |
| P3 | 4.0 | 3.42 | 0.637 | 5.25 | 4.01 | 0.721 |
| P4 | 4.3 | 3.45 | 0.611 | 6.25 | 5.58 | 0.78 |
| P5 | 4.8 | 4.26 | 0.726 | 6.5 | 5.66 | 0.798 |
| Mean (±SD) | 4.4 (0.33) | 3.7 (0.36) | 0.655 (0.05) | 6.01 (0.48) | 4.91 (0.85) | 0.759 (0.05) |
| Natural | ||||||
| N1 | 8.3 | 8 | 0.867 | 7.5 | 6.64 | 0.839 |
| N2 | 7.8 | 7.29 | 0.861 | 8 | 7.06 | 0.881 |
| N3 | 8.0 | 7.29 | 0.838 | 7.25 | 6.37 | 0.831 |
| N4 | 9.0 | 8.1 | 0.885 | 8.25 | 7.26 | 0.886 |
| N5 | 8.5 | 7.89 | 0.876 | 9.5 | 7.95 | 0.897 |
| Mean (±SD) | 8.3 (0.48) | 7.7 (0.4) | 0.865 (0.01) | 8.1 (0.87) | 7.06 (0.6) | 0.867 (0.03) |
Average number of alleles per locus (A), allelic richness rarefied to nine individuals (A; see text) and gene diversity (H S) per population and overall in adults and seeds among planted and natural populations.
Genetic variation for the four categories of Inga vera population studies.
| Populations |
|
|
|
|
| Planted | ||||
| Adults | 7.599a | 0.696a | −0.084a |
|
| Seedlings | 10.468b | 0.782b |
|
|
| Natural | ||||
| Adults | 14.128c | 0.885c | −0.061a | 0.028b |
| Seedlings | 13.195c | 0.881c |
| 0.021b |
Allelic richness (A) per locus rarefied to 38 individuals, gene diversity (H), inbreeding coefficient (F) and genetic differentiation (F). Values in the same column followed by distinct letters were statistically different at P≤0.01 for A and P≤0.05 for H, F and F; All the comparisons were based on 1,000 permutations; Values of F and F in bold were different from zero at P<0.05).
Figure 2Genetic substructure of planted and natural populations Inga vera.
Structure plot generated using BAPS 5.3, displaying only significant admixture (P<0.05) between planted and natural populations of adults (A and B) and seedlings (C and D). Number of genetic clusters (K) were assessed after five replicates.