Literature DB >> 1432102

Disruption of classical eyelid conditioning after cerebellar lesions: damage to a memory trace system or a simple performance deficit?

J E Steinmetz1, D G Lavond, D Ivkovich, C G Logan, R F Thompson.   

Abstract

Over the past 10 years, a number of laboratories have reported that classically conditioned skeletal muscle responses, such as conditioned nictitating membrane/eyelid responses, are critically dependent on activity in the cerebellum. For example, unilateral lesions of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus have been shown to prevent acquisition and abolish retention of the conditioned eyelid response on the side ipsilateral to the lesions without affecting conditioned responding (CR) on the contralateral side. Also, recording studies involving the interpositus nucleus have consistently revealed patterns of neuronal discharge that predict execution of the CR. The lesion and recording studies have generally been cited as evidence that plasticity in the cerebellum is critically involved in the learning and memory of classically conditioned responses. This interpretation was recently challenged by Welsh and Harvey (1989a), who claimed that cerebellar lesions simply produced a performance deficit and speculated that the role of the cerebellum was not in learning and memory processes associated with the CR but only in performance of the eye blink response. Presented here are three experiments that provide additional strong evidence for a critical role of the cerebellum in the learning and memory of the Pavlovian CR. These experiments include (1) demonstrations of complete and permanent CR abolition after appropriate interpositus lesions, (2) a failure to find systematic or persisting decrements in the unconditioned response amplitude (i.e., the eye blink reflex) after appropriate interpositus lesion, and (3) observations of differential effects on the CR and unconditioned response after lesions were placed in populations of motoneurons responsible for executing the eye blink response. These data are discussed in the context of performance versus learning issues; evidence presented here rules out the possibility that interpositus lesion abolition of the eye blink CR is simply due to lesion effects on performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1432102      PMCID: PMC6576008     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  43 in total

1.  Cerebellar cortical inhibition and classical eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Shaowen Bao; Lu Chen; Jeansok J Kim; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Ontogenetic changes in the neural mechanisms of eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  J H Freeman; D A Nicholson
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar

Review 3.  The role of interpositus nucleus in eyelid conditioned responses.

Authors:  J M Delgado-García; A Gruart
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 4.  Using eyeblink classical conditioning as a test of the functional consequences of exposure of the developing cerebellum to alcohol.

Authors:  John T Green
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar

5.  Time-dependent reorganization of the brain components underlying memory retention in trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Kaori Takehara; Shigenori Kawahara; Yutaka Kirino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Developmental changes in eyeblink conditioning and neuronal activity in the pontine nuclei.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Adam S Muckler
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Molecular evidence for two-stage learning and partial laterality in eyeblink conditioning of mice.

Authors:  Jin-Sung Park; Takashi Onodera; Shin-ichi Nishimura; Richard F Thompson; Shigeyoshi Itohara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cerebellar modulation of trigeminal reflex blinks: interpositus neurons.

Authors:  Fang-Ping Chen; Craig Evinger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Blockade of GABAA receptors in the interpositus nucleus modulates expression of conditioned excitation but not conditioned inhibition of the eyeblink response.

Authors:  Brian C Nolan; Daniel A Nicholson; John H Freeman
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec

10.  Localization of the cerebellar cortical zone mediating acquisition of eyeblink conditioning in rats.

Authors:  Adam B Steinmetz; John H Freeman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.