| Literature DB >> 24930092 |
Yong-Fang Yao, Qiu-Xia Dai, Jing Li, Qing-Yong Ni, Ming-Wang Zhang, Huai-Liang Xu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rhesus macaques living in western Sichuan, China, have been separated into several isolated populations due to habitat fragmentation. Previous studies based on the neutral or nearly neutral markers (mitochondrial DNA or microsatellites) showed high levels of genetic diversity and moderate genetic differentiation in the Sichuan rhesus macaques. Variation at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) loci is widely accepted as being maintained by balancing selection, even with a low level of neutral variability in some species. However, in small and isolated or bottlenecked populations, balancing selection may be overwhelmed by genetic drift. To estimate microevolutionary forces acting on the isolated rhesus macaque populations, we examined genetic variation at Mhc-DQB1 loci in 119 wild rhesus macaques from five geographically isolated populations in western Sichuan, China, and compared the levels of MHC variation and differentiation among populations with that previously observed at neutral microsatellite markers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24930092 PMCID: PMC4070090 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Distribution of sampling localitys in western Sichuan. Each filled circle representing a population and filled triangle representing Gongga Mountains (GGM). JL, Jiulong; HY, Hanyuan; DB, Danba; XJ, Xiaojin; HS, Heishui. The map in this figure was produced by author Qiuxia Dai.
Distribution of allelic frequencies for in five rhesus macaque populations
| 1. | 19 | 7.98 | 17 | 42.50 | 2 | 3.57 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2. | 25 | 10.50 | 2 | 5.00 | - | - | 7 | 25.00 | 13 | 24.07 | 3 | 5.00 |
| 3. | 3 | 1.26 | 3 | 7.50 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4. | 3 | 1.26 | 1 | 2.50 | 2 | 3.57 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 | 13 | 5.46 | 1 | 2.50 | - | - | 5 | 17.86 | 1 | 1.85 | 6 | 10.00 |
| 6. | 2 | 0.84 | - | - | 1 | 1.79 | - | - | 1 | 1.85 | - | - |
| 7. | 1 | 0.42 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 3.57 | - | - | - | - |
| 8. | 31 | 13.03 | 1 | 2.50 | 1 | 1.79 | 6 | 21.43 | 4 | 7.41 | 19 | 31.67 |
| 9. | 8 | 3.36 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 5.56 | 5 | 8.33 |
| 10. | 6 | 2.52 | 4 | 10.00 | 1 | 1.79 | - | - | 1 | 1.85 | - | - |
| 11. | 4 | 1.68 | - | - | 4 | 7.14 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 12. | 30 | 12.61 | - | - | 7 | 12.50 | 3 | 10.71 | 19 | 35.19 | 1 | 1.67 |
| 13. | 2 | 0.84 | - | - | 2 | 3.57 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 14. | 29 | 12.18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | 7.41 | 25 | 41.67 |
| 15. | 3 | 1.26 | - | - | 3 | 5.36 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 16. | 5 | 2.10 | 4 | 10.00 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1.67 |
| 17. | 8 | 3.36 | 3 | 7.50 | 3 | 5.36 | 2 | 7.14 | - | - | - | - |
| 18. | 5 | 2.10 | - | - | 5 | 8.93 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 19. | 7 | 2.94 | 1 | 2.50 | 2 | 3.57 | - | - | 4 | 7.41 | - | - |
| 20. | 23 | 9.66 | 2 | 5.00 | 15 | 26.79 | 2 | 7.14 | 4 | 7.41 | - | - |
| 21. | 3 | 1.26 | 1 | 2.50 | 2 | 3.57 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 22. | 2 | 0.84 | - | - | - | - | 2 | 7.14 | - | - | - | - |
| 23. | 6 | 2.52 | - | - | 6 | 10.71 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Notes: NA, number of alleles; AF, frequency of alleles (Gene frequency shown in the table was the percentage); n, number of individual. Shot line (hyphen) means zero. The bold allelic name showed 100% identity between Mamu-DQB1 and Mafa-DQB1nucleotide sequences. JL, Jiulong; HY, Hanyuan; DB, Danba; XJ, Xiaojin; HS, Heishui. Asterisk* is only a separate symbol between Mamu-DQB1 and allele number in the allele name.
Figure 2Histogram of frequency distribution in populations. The y-axis represents the alliic frequency and x-axis represents 23 MhcMmamu-DQB1 alleles, No. 1–23 presents each allele name in Table 1; JL, Jiulong; HY, Hanyuan; DB, Danba; XJ, Xiaojin; HS, Heishui. Red asterisk (*) represents group-specific alleles in this population.
Genetic diversity of within rhesus macaque populations
| JL | 12 | 0.800 | 0.07688 | 20.7564 | 0.600 | 0.780 | 10.275 | 0.255 | 0.73 | 6.27 |
| HY | 15 | 0.891 | 0.09296 | 25.1000 | 0.607 | 0.875 | 11.938 | 0.323 | 0.72 | 6.40 |
| DB | 8 | 0.862 | 0.08600 | 23.2196 | 0.786 | 0.832 | 8.000 | 0.092 | 0.68 | 5.68 |
| XJ | 10 | 0.807 | 0.10219 | 27.5919 | 0.741 | 0.792 | 8.262 | 0.084 | 0.70 | 6.20 |
| HS | 7 | 0.718 | 0.08387 | 22.6441 | 0.833 | 0.706 | 5.733 | −0.164 | 0.67 | 5.27 |
Notes: L, number of alleles; h, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; K: Average number of nucleotide differences; Ho, observed heterozygosities; He, expected heterozygosities; Fis, the inbreeding coefficient; A, estimates of allelic richness. M-He is the mean heterozygosity of Microsatellite alleles and M-Rs is the mean allelic number across 30 microsatellite loci per population from Li et al. [25]. JL, Jiulong; HY, Hanyuan; DB, Danba; XJ, Xiaojin; HS, Heishui.
Figure 3Phylogenetic tree of the alleles using neighbour-joing methods. 23 Mamu-DQB1 sequences detected in this study are shown with a solid round spot. 46 Mamu-DQB1 alleles not detected in animals of this study are showed with a circle. 85 Mafa-DQB1 sequences are showed without anything. 2 Aona-DQB1 (Aona-DQB1*220101 and Aona-DQB1*220102) were selected as outgroup. Except for 23 Mamu-DQB1 sequences detected in this study, all other DQB1 sequences were retrieved from the IPD-MHC Database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ipd/mhc/). Numbers at the node are bootstrap value in statistic analysis, only values above 50% are showed.
Mean numbers of nucleotide substitutions per non-synonymous site () and synonymous site () and the d/dratios (ω)
| Dataset A | ABS | 16 | 0.312 ± 0.073 | 0.214 ± 0.089 | 1.458 | 0.163 |
| Non-ABS | 73 | 0.082 ± 0.018 | 0.084 ± 0.021 | 0.976 | 0.483 | |
| All | 89 | 0.118 ± 0.020 | 0.103 ± 0.020 | 1.146 | 0.279 | |
| Dataset B | ABS | 16 | 0.251 ± 0.081 | 0.123 ± 0.068 | 2.041 | 0.039* |
| Non-ABS | 73 | 0.082 ± 0.018 | 0.078 ± 0.017 | 1.051 | 0.427 | |
| All | 89 | 0.106 ± 0.020 | 0.085 ± 0.017 | 1.247 | 0.192 |
Notes: Dataset A represented 23 Mamu-DQB1 alleles in this study;Dataset B represented currently 69 Mamu-DQB1 alleles including 46 alleles from IPD. ABS, the putative amino acid residues involved in antigen binding region (site 9, 11, 13, 28, 47, 57, 61, 67, 70, 71, 74, 78, 85, 86, 89 and 90), were identified according to the corresponding antigen binding sites identified in human HLA-DR and DQ structure (72). n, the number of codons encoding amino acid; Statistical significance is indicated by the asterisks (P <0.05).
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of sequences in five rhesus macaque populations
| Among populations | 4 | 14.706 | 0.06982 | 14.71 | 0.14712* |
| Within populations | 233 | 94.315 | 0.40479 | 85.29 | |
| Total | 237 | 109.021 |
Notes: Va, variance components among populations; Vb, variance components within populations; *Significant value (P < 0.05).
Genetic differentiation among five rhesus macaque populations
| JL | | 3.065 | 2.473 | 2.046 | 1.533 |
| HY | 0.075** | | 4.006 | 4.255 | 1.960 |
| DB | 0.092** | 0.059** | | 6.175 | 2.932 |
| XJ | 0.109** | 0.055** | 0.039* | | 2.176 |
| HS | 0.140** | 0.113** | 0.079** | 0.103** | |
Notes: Pairwise fixation index (FST) values calculated using allele frequency only (lower diagonal), DQB1-F values were in the first row; and microsate- F values were in the second row and were italic (from Li et al., [25]). Gene flow (Nm) values were in upper diagonal. Statistical significance is indicated by the asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). JL, Jiulong; HY, Hanyuan; DB, Danba; XJ, Xiaojin; HS, Heishui.
Figure 4Correlations between allele and microsatellite locus variation. (A) Mean microsatellite heterozygosity vs. MHC heterozygosity. (B) Mean microsatellite allelic richness vs MHC allelic richness per population.