Literature DB >> 12853956

Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies.

Mathieu Joron1, Paul M Brakefield.   

Abstract

Small isolated populations are frequently genetically less diverse than core populations, resulting in higher homozygosity that can hamper their long-term survival. The decrease in fitness of organisms owing to matings between relatives is well known from captive and laboratory animals. Such inbreeding can have strongly deleterious effects on life-history traits and survival, and can be critical to the success of population conservation. Because pedigrees are hard to follow in the wild, most field studies have used marker loci to establish that fitness declines with increasing homozygosity. Very few have experimentally explored the effects of inbreeding in the wild, or compared observations in the laboratory with field conditions. Here, using a technique involving the transfer of marker dusts during copulation, we show that a small decrease in mating success of captive inbred male butterflies in cages is greatly accentuated in conditions with unconstrained flight. Our results have important implications for conservation and for studies of sexual selection because they show that the behaviours underlying patterns of mating can be profoundly influenced by a history of inbreeding or by any restraining experimental conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12853956     DOI: 10.1038/nature01713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  36 in total

1.  Biased learning affects mate choice in a butterfly.

Authors:  Erica L Westerman; Andrea Hodgins-Davis; April Dinwiddie; Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Inbreeding depresses sperm competitiveness, but not fertilization or mating success in male Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  Lukasz Michalczyk; Oliver Y Martin; Anna L Millard; Brent C Emerson; Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Natural selection and developmental constraints in the evolution of allometries.

Authors:  W Anthony Frankino; Bas J Zwaan; David L Stern; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Effects of inbreeding, endogamy, genetic admixture, and outbreeding on human health: a (1001 Dalmatians) study.

Authors:  Igor Rudan; Zrinka Biloglav; Ariana Vorko-Jović; Mirjana Kujundzić-Tiljak; Ranko Stevanović; Darko Ropac; Dinko Puntarić; Branka Cucević; Branka Salzer; Harry Campbell
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.351

5.  Internal and external constraints in the evolution of morphological allometries in a butterfly.

Authors:  W Anthony Frankino; Bas J Zwaan; David L Stern; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Residual reproductive value and male mating success: older males do better.

Authors:  Klaus Fischer; Jana Perlick; Tobias Galetz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The scent of inbreeding: a male sex pheromone betrays inbred males.

Authors:  Erik van Bergen; Paul M Brakefield; Stéphanie Heuskin; Bas J Zwaan; Caroline M Nieberding
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Demographic costs of inbreeding revealed by sex-specific genetic rescue effects.

Authors:  Susanne R K Zajitschek; Felix Zajitschek; Robert C Brooks
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  High genetic load in an old isolated butterfly population.

Authors:  Anniina L K Mattila; Anne Duplouy; Malla Kirjokangas; Rainer Lehtonen; Pasi Rastas; Ilkka Hanski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The genetic, morphological, and physiological characterization of a dark larval cuticle mutation in the butterfly, Bicyclus anynana.

Authors:  Ashley Bear; Ariel Simons; Erica Westerman; Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.