Literature DB >> 34297151

[Quality criteria in arthroplasty].

Max Jaenisch1, Karl Dieter Heller2, Dieter Christian Wirtz3.   

Abstract

The discipline of orthopedics and trauma surgery strives for constant improvement of the quality of results in arthroplasty; however, in order to enable targeted alterations to the establish standard operating procedures, dedicated documentation of the current quality of results is necessary. This can be achieved by so-called external quality assurance, evaluation of routine data of healthcare providers, analysis of clinical studies and the consultation of registry data. To achieve further improvement of the quality of results, legislature has been passed setting requirements for minimum quantities and by the specialist society (German Society for Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery, DGOOC) the adherence to certain process and structural guidelines within the framework of the certification system EndoCert®. A valid score for risk adjustment for assessment of the level of difficulty of orthopedic surgical interventions is so far lacking. As a future direction, the application of risk stratification concerning patient-specific anatomy should be developed. Through the combination of dedicated certification systems, the recording and evaluation of external inpatient quality assurance data, further quality assurance through routinely collected data and the development of adequate minimum quantity regulations, sustainable improvement of the quality of results can be achieved.
© 2021. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty registry; Certification; Procedural quality; Quality management; Routine data; Structural quality

Year:  2021        PMID: 34297151     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01474-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  26 in total

1.  A new universal, standardized implant database for product identification: a unique tool for arthroplasty registries.

Authors:  Wilhelm Blömer; Arnd Steinbrück; Christian Schröder; Franz-Josef Grothaus; Oliver Melsheimer; Henrich Mannel; Gerhard Forkel; Thomas Eilers; Thoralf R Liebs; Joachim Hassenpflug; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Joint registries: what can we learn in 2016?

Authors:  D J Berry
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Rules of Engagement Using Large Databases: Read the Fine Print.

Authors:  John J Callaghan; Michael A Mont; Kevin Bozic; William Maloney; Daniel Berry
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Retrospective Comparative Study of the Influence on Quality of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty by the EndoCert-Certification System in a Communal Hospital.

Authors:  Philipp Bergschmidt; Jan Pawel Maruniewicz; Thomas Westphal; Annett Klinder; Wolfram Mittelmeier
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 0.923

5.  Big Data and Total Hip Arthroplasty: How Do Large Databases Compare?

Authors:  Nicholas A Bedard; Andrew J Pugely; Michael A McHugh; Nathan R Lux; Kevin J Bozic; John J Callaghan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Orthopaedic Surgery Journals.

Authors:  Jake X Checketts; Mathew T Sims; Byron Detweiler; Kevin Middlemist; Jaclyn Jones; Matt Vassar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  [Prevalence of selected musculoskeletal conditions in Germany: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1)].

Authors:  J Fuchs; M Rabenberg; C Scheidt-Nave
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials.

Authors:  Sandra M Eldridge; Claire L Chan; Michael J Campbell; Christine M Bond; Sally Hopewell; Lehana Thabane; Gillian A Lancaster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-10-24

9.  ASA class is associated with early revision and reoperation after total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of the Geneva and Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registries.

Authors:  Rory J Ferguson; Alan J Silman; Christophe Combescure; Erik Bulow; Daniel Odin; Didier Hannouche; Siôn Glyn-Jones; Ola Rolfson; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Risk of Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Crowe Type IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Authors:  Zi-Chuan Ding; Wei-Nan Zeng; Ping Mou; Zhi-Min Liang; Duan Wang; Zong-Ke Zhou
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.