Literature DB >> 24926443

Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Evidence-based Management of Cholesterol.

Satyajeet Roy1.   

Abstract

An elevated level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is directly associated with development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, which may present as coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease. The new cholesterol management guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association aim to address a comprehensive approach to prevent and reduce the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The new guidelines recommend initiation of heart healthy lifestyle modifications and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A reductase inhibitor ("statin") therapy in individuals who are at a high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. It is estimated that these guidelines could result in "statin" therapy for one in every three adults in the United States. This article presents a review of the current cholesterol management guidelines, recommendations from relevant randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses obtained from the searches in Medline/PubMed and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and publications from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service, and the United States Preventive Services Task Force.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; cholesterol management; statin

Year:  2014        PMID: 24926443      PMCID: PMC4049051          DOI: 10.4103/1947-2714.132916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 1947-2714


Introduction

Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. High cholesterol increases the risk of developing cardiovascular (CV) disease.[1] About 45% of Medicare beneficiaries have high cholesterol, making it the second most common condition among all of the out-patient medical office encounters.[2] An elevated level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is directly associated with development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which includes coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD).[3] Although approximately 71 million adults in the United States have elevated LDL-C, less than half receive treatment, and only a third have LDL-C in the desired target level.[4]

Old concept

In the United States, cholesterol screening has been recommended for men of ages 35 and older, for women of ages 45 and older, and for men and women of ages 20 and older if they are at increased risk for CHD.[5] The practice of cholesterol management is based on the recommendations to treat elevated LDL-C beyond a specific goal in individuals who fall into a specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk category as per the guidelines of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults, also known as Adult Treatment Panel-III (ATP-III).[6]

New concept

The goals of the new cholesterol management guidelines include the prevention of ASCVD, improving the management of individuals who have ASCVD, and promoting optimal ASCVD care.[3] An expert panel was appointed for detection, evaluation, and treatment of cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel-IV)[7] in order to develop evidence-based guidelines, which follow the practice guidelines and the evidence-based standards set by the Institute of Medicine report.[8] The recommendations made by the expert panel aim to assess CV risk, reduce CV risk by modification of lifestyle factors, guide maintenance of an ideal body mass index, and manage blood cholesterol. After an extensive review of the data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCTs, the panel developed these cholesterol management guidelines in order to reduce risk of ASCVD, not just the prevention of CVD alone as proposed by the ATP-III.[9] The RCTs have shown that the increased ASCVD risk is not only associated with elevated LDL-C levels, but also factors such as gender, race, tobacco smoking, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus should be included in the comprehensive management of cholesterol.[10] The guidelines recommend beginning cholesterol screening in all adults who are 21 years or older.[3] The panel did not find evidence to support the titration of cholesterol lowering drug therapy to achieve target LDL-C or nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels.[36] Lifestyle modifications are the critical components of ASCVD risk reduction.[3] These include adherence to a heart healthy diet, regular exercise, maintenance of a healthy weight, and avoidance of tobacco products.[11] The panel also found that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (“statins”) are the only cholesterol lowering drugs that have shown ASCVD risk reduction,[12] and each 39 mg/dL reduction in LDL-C by a statin reduces the risk of ASCVD by 20%.[3] In order to reduce the risk of ASCVD an appropriate intensity of statin therapy should be used [Table 1]. As far as the nonstatin cholesterol-lowering drugs are concerned, the panel found no evidence to support the use of this category of drugs either as monotherapy or in combination with a statin.[1314] The panel also identified the high-risk groups that do not benefit from statin therapy.[3]
Table 1

Intensity of statin therapy

Intensity of statin therapy

New Management Guidelines

The benefits of lipid lowering drug “statin” therapy outweigh the risks in the four groups of patients who are at increased risk of ASCVD [Table 2, Figure 1].[151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738] In patients with LDL-C greater than 190 mg/dL and/or triglyceride greater than 500 mg/dL it is necessary to investigate and correct the common causes of secondary hyperlipidemia [Table 3] before initiation of statin therapy.[48] The panel does not support “statin” therapy in patients who are older than 75 years without clinical ASCVD,[4950] who are on hemodialysis,[19] and who suffer from New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV heart failure.[51] The role of additional factors, such as biomarkers and noninvasive tests, [Table 4] is limited to patients who either do not qualify in the four statin benefit groups, or in whom it is unclear to make a decision of initiating statin therapy.[3]
Table 2

Key recommendations: Four statin benefit groups

Figure 1

Flow Diagram of Cholesterol Management. (ASCVD = Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease; LDL-C = Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; DM = Diabetes Mellitus; MIST = Moderateintensity statin therapy; HIST = High-intensity statin therapy; M-HIST = Moderate to high-intensity statin therapy.)

* See Table 4.

Table 3

Common causes of secondary hyperlipidemia

Table 4

Additional ASCVD risk factors

Key recommendations: Four statin benefit groups Flow Diagram of Cholesterol Management. (ASCVD = Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease; LDL-C = Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; DM = Diabetes Mellitus; MIST = Moderateintensity statin therapy; HIST = High-intensity statin therapy; M-HIST = Moderate to high-intensity statin therapy.) * See Table 4. Common causes of secondary hyperlipidemia Additional ASCVD risk factors

ASCVD Risk Assessment

A comprehensive tool, known as Pooled Cohort Risk Assessment Equation (PCRAE),[10] for the prediction and assessment of 10-year risk of an ASCVD event has been developed, which contrasts with the conventional risk assessment of CHD alone.[9] This equation was developed after an extensive review of diverse participants from several large studies. This equation should be used in women and men aged 40–79 who have LDL-C levels of 70–189 mg/dL. The equation includes risk factors such as: gender, age, race (African-American or non-Hispanic Caucasian), total cholesterol, HDL-C, systolic blood pressure, receiving treatment for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and smoking. The risk of ASCVD is generally lower in Hispanic and Asian populations, and higher in American-Indian populations compared with non-Hispanic Caucasians. For the purpose of risk assessment, patients of all other races should be entered as non-Hispanic Caucasian. The PCRAE calculator is easy to download as a Microsoft Excel auto-calculator.[3] It is evident that gender, age, and race play major role in the risk assessment; changes in lifestyle can modify factors like blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, and smoking, which can alter the calculated 10-year risk of ASCVD in the same patient [Table 5]. The new guidelines are designed to address the context of a patient to be the prime basis of decision-making by the clinicians. Several concerns have been raised regarding potential recruitment of a larger number of the United States’ population for statin therapy following the current cholesterol guidelines,[52] but the recommendations are based on the current evidence-based data that supports global CV risk reduction.[353]
Table 5

10-year risk of ASCVD by pooled cohort risk assessment equation

10-year risk of ASCVD by pooled cohort risk assessment equation

Most Effective Therapeutic Agent – Statin

The data from RCTs and meta-analysis of RCTs[3] has shown that use of a “statin” provides substantial benefits in primary prevention of ASCVD and risk reduction in patients with LDL-C levels of 70 mg/dL and above.[1654] Statins have also shown similar benefits in patients with hypertension,[55] diabetes,[39] low HDL-C,[15] elevated C-reactive protein,[38] etc. Additionally, it has been confirmed by the Cochrane meta-analysis[17] and the meta-analysis by the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists[1218] that statin therapy for primary prevention reduces fatal and nonfatal ASCVD. An effective dose statin therapy has been defined as high-intensity or moderate-intensity [Tables 1 and 6]. The panel found that both high-intensity and moderate-to-high-intensity statin therapy are effective and safe in ASCVD risk reduction. On the contrary low-intensity statin therapy (e.g., Simvastatin 10 mg, Pravastatin 10–20 mg, Lovastatin 20 mg, Fluvastatin 20–40 mg, Pitavastatin 1 mg) may achieve a target LDL-C goal (as per ATP-III guidelines) without effective ASCVD risk reduction.[3] Similarly, patients may receive an ineffective low-intensity statin therapy with a nonstatin drug combination for presumed safety concerns of statin in order to achieve a specific target LDL-C goal, which does not offer ASCVD risk reduction either.[3] Patients on statin should be monitored for muscle injury, hepatic injury, new-onset diabetes, and other safety concerns [Table 7]. The risk of statin associated myopathy and hemorrhagic stroke is minimal compared with the excess risk of ASCVD due to lack of statin therapy.[12] Additional factors that influence ASCVD risk [Table 4] should be considered in the group of patients in whom the benefit of statin therapy for ASCVD prevention is less clear, such as in the case of patients without clinical ASCVD and without diabetes mellitus who are aged between 21 and 39 years and have LDL-C in the range of 71–189 mg/dL.[3]
Table 6

Evidence based recommended statins

Table 7

Statin safety: NHLBI grading the strength of recommendations

Evidence based recommended statins Statin safety: NHLBI grading the strength of recommendations

Clinical Impact

It is estimated that the new cholesterol management guidelines could result in statin therapy for one in every three adults in the United States.[52] The new cholesterol management approach is primarily geared toward a comprehensive risk reduction of ASCVD, not just to attain a specific LDL-C goal level [Figure 2]. There are some limitations of the new guidelines in specific groups, such as younger adults (aged 21–39 years), individuals with low 10-year ASCVD risk but high lifetime risk based on additional factors, individuals with serious comorbidities, such as HIV infection, rheumatologic disorders, solid organ transplant recipients. Future guidelines may provide management of hypertriglyceridemia, use of non-HDL-C in decision making, or use of therapeutic markers, such as Apo B, Lp(a), LDL particle size. More recent studies suggest a proper method of estimation of LDL-C level based on a calculation that uses a variable ratio of triglyceride (TG) and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), and not just the standard 5:1 ratio of TG:VLDL-C as proposed by the Friedewald equation.[6364] This may change the estimation of LDL-C level and allow clinicians to assign their patients appropriately into more accurate ASCVD risk category.
Figure 2

Suggested Steps to Manage Cholesterol. (ASCVD = Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, LDL-C = Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, DM = Diabetes mellitus, HIST = High-intensity statin therapy, MIST = Moderate-intensity statin therapy, HD = Hemodialysis, NYHA = New York Heart Association.) Information from reference 3.

Suggested Steps to Manage Cholesterol. (ASCVD = Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, LDL-C = Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, DM = Diabetes mellitus, HIST = High-intensity statin therapy, MIST = Moderate-intensity statin therapy, HD = Hemodialysis, NYHA = New York Heart Association.) Information from reference 3.

Conclusion

The current cholesterol management guidelines provide a comprehensive approach toward ASCVD risk reduction. It is a major shift from the old approach in which a target LDL-C was aimed in order to reduce cardiovascular risk only for the specific cardiovascular risk stratified patient categories. Moderate-intensity and high-intensity statin therapies are safe and effective interventions that have shown major ASCVD risk reduction in statin benefit groups. Clinicians are encouraged to use clinical judgment based on risks, benefits, drug interactions, and patient preference to statin therapy.
  57 in total

1.  Reconsidering medication appropriateness for patients late in life.

Authors:  Holly M Holmes; Déon Cox Hayley; G Caleb Alexander; Greg A Sachs
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-03-27

2.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.

Authors:  W T Friedewald; R I Levy; D S Fredrickson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy.

Authors:  William E Boden; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Todd Anderson; Bernard R Chaitman; Patrice Desvignes-Nickens; Kent Koprowicz; Ruth McBride; Koon Teo; William Weintraub
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  External validation of an index to predict up to 9-year mortality of community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Roger B Davis; Ellen P McCarthy; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Rosuvastatin for primary prevention in older persons with elevated C-reactive protein and low to average low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels: exploratory analysis of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Robert J Glynn; Wolfgang Koenig; Børge G Nordestgaard; James Shepherd; Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Cardiovascular risk prediction in diabetic men and women using hemoglobin A1c vs diabetes as a high-risk equivalent.

Authors:  Nina P Paynter; Norman A Mazer; Aruna D Pradhan; J Michael Gaziano; Paul M Ridker; Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-25

8.  Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Helen M Colhoun; D John Betteridge; Paul N Durrington; Graham A Hitman; H Andrew W Neil; Shona J Livingstone; Margaret J Thomason; Michael I Mackness; Valentine Charlton-Menys; John H Fuller
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Aug 21-27       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study.

Authors:  J R Downs; M Clearfield; S Weis; E Whitney; D R Shapiro; P A Beere; A Langendorfer; E A Stein; W Kruyer; A M Gotto
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  J Shepherd; S M Cobbe; I Ford; C G Isles; A R Lorimer; P W MacFarlane; J H McKillop; C J Packard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-11-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

1.  The intake of a high-fat diet and grape seed procyanidins induces gene expression changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of hamsters: capturing alterations in lipid and cholesterol metabolisms.

Authors:  Antoni Caimari; Anna Crescenti; Francesc Puiggròs; Noemí Boqué; Lluís Arola; Josep Maria Del Bas
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.523

2.  Transferrin predicts trimethylamine-N-oxide levels and is a potential biomarker of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Lamuel D Bean; Jeffrey J Wing; Randall E Harris; Suzanne M Smart; Subha V Raman; M Wesley Milks
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.174

3.  Functional polymorphisms in interleukin-23 receptor and susceptibility to coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Meiyan Zhang; Zhen-Rong Cai; Bili Zhang; Xinmeng Cai; Wei Li; Zhifu Guo; Lan Ma
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.311

4.  PPAR𝛾 Gene and Atherosclerosis: Genetic Polymorphisms, Epigenetics and Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  E Grbić; A Peterlin; T Kunej; D Petrovič
Journal:  Balkan J Med Genet       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 0.519

5.  Development of Novel DNA-Encoded PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibodies as Lipid-Lowering Therapeutics.

Authors:  Makan Khoshnejad; Ami Patel; Krzysztof Wojtak; Sagar B Kudchodkar; Laurent Humeau; Nicholas N Lyssenko; Daniel J Rader; Kar Muthumani; David B Weiner
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 11.454

6.  Diet and Nutraceutical Supplementation in Dyslipidemic Patients: First Results of an Italian Single Center Real-World Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Pasta; Elena Formisano; Anna Laura Cremonini; Elio Maganza; Erika Parodi; Sabrina Piras; Livia Pisciotta
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Prevalence and associated factors of uncontrolled hyperlipidemia among Thai patients with diabetes and clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Teeraboon Lertwanichwattana; Ram Rangsin; Boonsub Sakboonyarat
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2021-03-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.