Literature DB >> 17984166

Rosuvastatin in older patients with systolic heart failure.

John Kjekshus1, Eduard Apetrei, Vivencio Barrios, Michael Böhm, John G F Cleland, Jan H Cornel, Peter Dunselman, Cândida Fonseca, Assen Goudev, Peer Grande, Lars Gullestad, Ake Hjalmarson, Jaromir Hradec, András Jánosi, Gabriel Kamenský, Michel Komajda, Jerzy Korewicki, Timo Kuusi, François Mach, Vyacheslav Mareev, John J V McMurray, Naresh Ranjith, Maria Schaufelberger, Johan Vanhaecke, Dirk J van Veldhuisen, Finn Waagstein, Hans Wedel, John Wikstrand.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with systolic heart failure have generally been excluded from statin trials. Acute coronary events are uncommon in this population, and statins have theoretical risks in these patients.
METHODS: A total of 5011 patients at least 60 years of age with New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV ischemic, systolic heart failure were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg of rosuvastatin or placebo per day. The primary composite outcome was death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Secondary outcomes included death from any cause, any coronary event, death from cardiovascular causes, and the number of hospitalizations.
RESULTS: As compared with the placebo group, patients in the rosuvastatin group had decreased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (difference between groups, 45.0%; P<0.001) and of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (difference between groups, 37.1%; P<0.001). During a median follow-up of 32.8 months, the primary outcome occurred in 692 patients in the rosuvastatin group and 732 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.02; P=0.12), and 728 patients and 759 patients, respectively, died (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.05; P=0.31). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the coronary outcome or death from cardiovascular causes. In a prespecified secondary analysis, there were fewer hospitalizations for cardiovascular causes in the rosuvastatin group (2193) than in the placebo group (2564) (P<0.001). No excessive episodes of muscle-related or other adverse events occurred in the rosuvastatin group.
CONCLUSIONS: Rosuvastatin did not reduce the primary outcome or the number of deaths from any cause in older patients with systolic heart failure, although the drug did reduce the number of cardiovascular hospitalizations. The drug did not cause safety problems. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00206310.) 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17984166     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  305 in total

Review 1.  Reverse remodeling in heart failure--mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Norimichi Koitabashi; David A Kass
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Glutamate synthase: a fascinating pathway from L-glutamine to L-glutamate.

Authors:  R H H van den Heuvel; B Curti; M A Vanoni; A Mattevi
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Mitohormesis: another pleiotropic effect of statins?

Authors:  James K Liao
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Rosuvastatin and clinical outcomes in individuals who are not deemed appropriate for baseline statin therapy.

Authors:  Michael Clearfield
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Quantifying the cost in power of ignoring continuous covariate imbalances in clinical trial randomization.

Authors:  Jody Ciolino; Wenle Zhao; Renee' Martin; Yuko Palesch
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  The cornucopia of "pleiotropic" actions of statins: myogenesis as a new mechanism for statin-induced benefits?

Authors:  Roberto Bolli; Buddhadeb Dawn
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 7.  Targeting the mevalonate cascade as a new therapeutic approach in heart disease, cancer and pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Behzad Yeganeh; Emilia Wiechec; Sudharsana R Ande; Pawan Sharma; Adel Rezaei Moghadam; Martin Post; Darren H Freed; Mohammad Hashemi; Shahla Shojaei; Amir A Zeki; Saeid Ghavami
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 12.310

8.  Chronic HMGCR/HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor treatment contributes to dysglycemia by upregulating hepatic gluconeogenesis through autophagy induction.

Authors:  Hye Jin Wang; Jae Yeo Park; Obin Kwon; Eun Yeong Choe; Chul Hoon Kim; Kyu Yeon Hur; Myung-Shik Lee; Mijin Yun; Bong Soo Cha; Young-Bum Kim; Hyangkyu Lee; Eun Seok Kang
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 16.016

Review 9.  Current Management and Future Directions of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: a Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Chayakrit Krittanawong; Marrick L Kukin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 10.  Muscle wasting and cachexia in heart failure: mechanisms and therapies.

Authors:  Stephan von Haehling; Nicole Ebner; Marcelo R Dos Santos; Jochen Springer; Stefan D Anker
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.