Literature DB >> 24925858

The accuracy of the out-of-field dose calculations using a model based algorithm in a commercial treatment planning system.

Lilie Wang1, George X Ding.   

Abstract

The out-of-field dose can be clinically important as it relates to the dose of the organ-at-risk, although the accuracy of its calculation in commercial radiotherapy treatment planning systems (TPSs) receives less attention. This study evaluates the uncertainties of out-of-field dose calculated with a model based dose calculation algorithm, anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA), implemented in a commercial radiotherapy TPS, Varian Eclipse V10, by using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, in which the entire accelerator head is modeled including the multi-leaf collimators. The MC calculated out-of-field doses were validated by experimental measurements. The dose calculations were performed in a water phantom as well as CT based patient geometries and both static and highly modulated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) fields were evaluated. We compared the calculated out-of-field doses, defined as lower than 5% of the prescription dose, in four H&amp;N cancer patients and two lung cancer patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and IMRT techniques. The results show that the discrepancy of calculated out-of-field dose profiles between AAA and the MC depends on the depth and is generally less than 1% for in water phantom comparisons and in CT based patient dose calculations for static field and IMRT. In cases of VMAT plans, the difference between AAA and MC is <0.5%. The clinical impact resulting from the error on the calculated organ doses were analyzed by using dose-volume histograms. Although the AAA algorithm significantly underestimated the out-of-field doses, the clinical impact on the calculated organ doses in out-of-field regions may not be significant in practice due to very low out-of-field doses relative to the target dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24925858     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/13/N113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  Measurement and modeling of out-of-field doses from various advanced post-mastectomy radiotherapy techniques.

Authors:  Jihyung Yoon; David Heins; Xiaodong Zhao; Mary Sanders; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Reconstruction of organ dose for external radiotherapy patients in retrospective epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Choonik Lee; Jae Won Jung; Christopher Pelletier; Anil Pyakuryal; Stephanie Lamart; Jong Oh Kim; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Exposure of the heart and cardiac valves in women irradiated for breast cancer 1970-2009.

Authors:  Frances K Duane; Naomi B Boekel; Judy N Jacobse; Zhe Wang; Berthe M P Aleman; Sarah C Darby; Michael Schaapveld; Flora E van Leeuwen; Margreet H A Baaijens; Samantha Warren; Carolyn W Taylor
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-16

4.  Comparison of normal tissue dose calculation methods for epidemiological studies of radiotherapy patients.

Authors:  Matthew M Mille; Jae Won Jung; Choonik Lee; Gleb A Kuzmin; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 1.394

5.  Comparison of Two RapidArc Delivery Strategies in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Peripheral Lung Cancer with Flattening Filter Free Beams.

Authors:  Bao-Tian Huang; Jia-Yang Lu; Pei-Xian Lin; Jian-Zhou Chen; Yu Kuang; Chuang-Zhen Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Implementation of the validation testing in MPPG 5.a "Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations-megavoltage photon and electron beams".

Authors:  Dustin J Jacqmin; Jeremy S Bredfeldt; Sean P Frigo; Jennifer B Smilowitz
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for left-sided breast cancer and all regional nodes improves target volumes coverage and reduces treatment time and doses to the heart and left coronary artery, compared with a field-in-field technique.

Authors:  Marguerite Tyran; Hugues Mailleux; Agnes Tallet; Pierre Fau; Laurence Gonzague; Mathieu Minsat; Laurence Moureau-Zabotto; Michel Resbeut
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Revisiting fetal dose during radiation therapy: evaluating treatment techniques and a custom shield.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Donald A Roberts; Elizabeth L Covington; James A Hayman; Kathryn M Masi; Choonik Lee; Jean M Moran; Joann I Prisciandaro
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  A simple technique to improve calculated skin dose accuracy in a commercial treatment planning system.

Authors:  Lilie Wang; Anthony J Cmelak; George X Ding
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Estimating the uncertainty of calculated out-of-field organ dose from a commercial treatment planning system.

Authors:  Lilie Wang; George X Ding
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.