Literature DB >> 24925624

Prognostic value of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetic patients: a meta-analysis.

Wanda Acampa1, Valeria Cantoni, Roberta Green, Francesca Maio, Stefania Daniele, Carmela Nappi, Valeria Gaudieri, Giorgio Punzo, Mario Petretta, Alberto Cuocolo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of normal stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS) in patients with diabetes has only been evaluated in single-center studies of relatively limited sample size. We performed a meta-analysis of published studies, including diabetic patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), to assess the predictive value for adverse cardiac ischemic events of normal stress MPS. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Studies published between January 1990 and December 2013 were identified by database search. We included studies using stress MPS to evaluate diabetic patients with known or suspected CAD and providing data on clinical outcomes of non-fatal myocardial infarction or cardiac death with a follow-up time ≥12 months. A total of 14 studies were finally included, recruiting 13,493 patients. The negative predictive value (NPV) for non-fatal myocardial infarction and cardiac death of normal MPS was 94.92% (95% confidence interval 93.67-96.05), during a weighted mean follow-up of 36.24 months, resulting in estimated event rate after a negative test equal to 5.08% (95% confidence interval 3.95-6.33). The corresponding annualized event rate after a negative test was 1.60% (95% confidence interval 1.21-2.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Stress MPS has a high NPV for adverse cardiac events in diabetic patients with known or suspected CAD leading to define a "relatively low-risk" patients category.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24925624     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-014-9918-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  36 in total

1.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Cardiac computed tomography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for risk stratification in asymptomatic individuals without known cardiovascular disease: a position statement of the Working Group on Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Pasquale Perrone-Filardi; Stephan Achenbach; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Zeljko Reiner; Gianmario Sambuceti; Joanne D Schuijf; Ernst Van der Wall; Philip A Kaufmann; Juhani Knuuti; Stephen Schroeder; Michael J Zellweger
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Philip Greenland; Joseph S Alpert; George A Beller; Emelia J Benjamin; Matthew J Budoff; Zahi A Fayad; Elyse Foster; Mark A Hlatky; John McB Hodgson; Frederick G Kushner; Michael S Lauer; Leslee J Shaw; Sidney C Smith; Allen J Taylor; William S Weintraub; Nanette K Wenger; Alice K Jacobs
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Myocardial perfusion imaging and cardiac events in a cohort of asymptomatic patients with diabetes living in southern France.

Authors:  A Sultan; C Piot; D Mariano-Goulart; J P Daures; F Comte; E Renard; A Avignon
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.359

5.  Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ton J Cleophas; Aeilko H Zwinderman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Daniel S Berman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Paul A Heidenreich; Robert E Henkin; Patricia A Pellikka; Gerald M Pohost; Kim A Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  The prognostic value of normal stress cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paola Gargiulo; Santo Dellegrottaglie; Dario Bruzzese; Gianluigi Savarese; Oriana Scala; Donatella Ruggiero; Carmen D'Amore; Stefania Paolillo; Piergiuseppe Agostoni; Edoardo Bossone; Andrea Soricelli; Alberto Cuocolo; Bruno Trimarco; Pasquale Perrone Filardi
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  Evaluating the clinical impact of cardiovascular imaging: is a risk-based stratification paradigm relevant?

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Rory Hachamovitch
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Prognostic value of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging and ventricular function in Japanese asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes--a study based on the J-ACCESS-2 database.

Authors:  Shinro Matsuo; Kenichi Nakajima; Yoshimitsu Yamasaki; Atsunori Kashiwagi; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 2.993

View more
  10 in total

1.  Screening asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes is recommended: Pro.

Authors:  Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Immortality time and serial myocardial perfusion imaging: Only those who do not die may repeat the exam.

Authors:  Mario Petretta; Marco Salvatore; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in The Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2014: Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Comparison of ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines for myocardial revascularization: are the differences clinically relevant? The European perspective.

Authors:  Mario Petretta; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Cardiovascular risk assessment and screening in diabetes.

Authors:  Yanglu Zhao
Journal:  Cardiovasc Endocrinol       Date:  2017-02-15

6.  Prognostic value of one millisievert exercise myocardial perfusion imaging in patients without known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Bernard Songy; Mohamed Guernou; Daniel Hivoux; David Attias; David Lussato; Mathieu Queneau; Gerald Bonardel; Marc Bertaux
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Noninvasive Cardiovascular Risk Assessment of the Asymptomatic Diabetic Patient: The Imaging Council of the American College of Cardiology.

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Paolo Raggi; George A Beller; Daniel S Berman; Regina S Druz; Shaista Malik; Vera H Rigolin; Wm Guy Weigold; Prem Soman
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-02

8.  Predictors of Myocardial Ischemia in Preoperative Oncology Patients Who Underwent Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography Study.

Authors:  Faisal Alsugair; Ali Aljomah; Eman Fathala; Ahmed Fathala
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-03-12

Review 9.  Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance as Pathophysiologic Tool in Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Sophie I Mavrogeni; Flora Bacopoulou; George Markousis-Mavrogenis; Aikaterini Giannakopoulou; Ourania Kariki; Vasiliki Vartela; Genovefa Kolovou; Evangelia Charmandari; George Chrousos
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 10.  Cardiovascular Screening for the Asymptomatic Patient with Diabetes: More Cons Than Pros.

Authors:  Konstantinos Makrilakis; Stavros Liatis
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.011

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.