Literature DB >> 20630895

Cardiac computed tomography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for risk stratification in asymptomatic individuals without known cardiovascular disease: a position statement of the Working Group on Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology.

Pasquale Perrone-Filardi1, Stephan Achenbach, Stefan Möhlenkamp, Zeljko Reiner, Gianmario Sambuceti, Joanne D Schuijf, Ernst Van der Wall, Philip A Kaufmann, Juhani Knuuti, Stephen Schroeder, Michael J Zellweger.   

Abstract

Cardiovascular events remain one of the most frequent causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. The majority of cardiac events occur in individuals without known coronary artery disease (CAD) and in low- to intermediate-risk subjects. Thus, the development of improved preventive strategies may substantially benefit from the identification, among apparently intermediate-risk subjects, of those who have a high probability for developing future cardiac events. Cardiac computed tomography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) by single photon emission computed tomography may play a role in this setting. In fact, absence of coronary calcium in cardiac computed tomography and inducible ischaemia in MPS are associated with a very low rate of major cardiac events in the next 3-5 years. Based on current evidence, the evaluation of coronary calcium in primary prevention subjects should be considered in patients classified as intermediate-risk based on traditional risk factors, since high calcium scores identify subjects at high-risk who may benefit from aggressive secondary prevention strategies. In addition, calcium scoring should be considered for asymptomatic type 2 diabetic patients without known CAD to select those in whom further functional testing by MPS or other stress imaging techniques may be considered to identify patients with significant inducible ischaemia. From available data, the use of MPS as first line testing modality for risk stratification is not recommended in any category of primary prevention subjects with the possible exception of first-degree relatives of patients with premature CAD in whom MPS may be considered. However, the Working Group recognizes that neither the use of computed tomography for calcium imaging nor of MPS have been proven to significantly improve clinical outcomes of primary prevention subjects in prospective controlled studies. This information would be crucial to adequately define the role of imaging approaches in cardiovascular preventive strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20630895     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  32 in total

1.  Statins for primary prevention: problems with cardiovascular-risk estimation?

Authors:  Željko Reiner
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Atherosclerosis screening by noninvasive imaging for cardiovascular prevention: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicolas Rodondi; Reto Auer; Vanessa de Bosset Sulzer; William A Ghali; Jacques Cornuz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  The incremental value of coronary artery calcium scores to myocardial single photon emission computer tomography in risk assessment.

Authors:  Marcus Hacker; Christoph Becker
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Hyperhomocysteinemia is an independent risk factor in young patients with coronary artery disease in southern China.

Authors:  Y Wu; Y Huang; Y Hu; J Zhong; Z He; W Li; Y Yang; D Xu; S Wu
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  Does a test impact on a patient's life many years from now?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  New risk markers for cardiovascular prevention.

Authors:  Guy G De Backer
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.113

7.  [Cardiac imaging in (asymptomatic) diabetic patients].

Authors:  M J Zellweger
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.443

8.  The prognostic significance of coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Kevin M Woods; Collin Fischer; Michael K Cheezum; Edward A Hulten; Binh Nguyen; Todd C Villines
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  QTc Heterogeneity in Rest Magnetocardiography is Sensitive to Detect Coronary Artery Disease: In Comparison with Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.

Authors:  Yen-Wen Wu; Lung-Chun Lin; Wei-Kung Tseng; Yen-Bin Liu; Hsian-Li Kao; Mao-Shin Lin; Huei-Chun Huang; Shan-Ying Wang; Herng-Er Horng; Hong-Chang Yang; Chau-Chung Wu
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 10.  Therapeutic modulation of the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis: lessons learned from serial imaging studies.

Authors:  Jordan Andrews; Rishi Puri; Yu Kataoka; Stephen J Nicholls; Peter J Psaltis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.