Literature DB >> 25920482

Review of cardiovascular imaging in The Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2014: Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.

Fadi G Hage1, Wael A AlJaroudi.   

Abstract

In this new feature of The Journal of Nuclear Cardiology we will summarize key articles that were published in the Journal in the previous year. In the first article of this 2-part series we concentrated on publications dealing with cardiac positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and neuronal imaging. This review will focus on myocardial perfusion imaging summarizing advances in the field including in diagnosis, prognosis, appropriateness, and safety of testing.

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 25920482     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-015-0144-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  30 in total

1.  The influence of coronary calcium score on the interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Mohamed Mouden; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Jorik R Timmer; Stoffer Reiffers; Ad H J Oostdijk; Siert Knollema; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution attenuation-corrected Anger-camera SPECT in the detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Harshal R Patil; Timothy M Bateman; A Iain McGhie; Eric V Burgett; Staci A Courter; James A Case; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  The prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony using gated myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Himanshu Aggarwal; Wael A AlJaroudi; Shikha Mehta; Roslyn Mannon; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  The effects of dobutamine stress on cardiac mechanical synchrony determined by phase analysis of gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in a canine model.

Authors:  Samaneh Salimian; Bernard Thibault; Vincent Finnerty; Jean Grégoire; François Harel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for the assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Ji Chen; Ernest V Garcia; Jeroen J Bax; Ami E Iskandrian; Salvador Borges-Neto; Prem Soman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Prognostic value of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by phase analysis in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with ejection fraction 35-50% and QRS < 150 ms.

Authors:  Adam S Goldberg; M Chadi Alraies; Manuel D Cerqueira; Wael A Jaber; Wael A Aljaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Prevalence, location, and extent of significant coronary artery disease in patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Shu Yokota; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Mohamed Mouden; Jorik R Timmer; Siert Knollema; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  The acute and chronic effects of different right ventricular site pacing on left ventricular mechanical synchrony as assessed by phase analysis of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Hongxiang Zhang; Xiaofeng Hou; Yao Wang; Sheliang Xue; Kejiang Cao; Ji Chen; Jiangang Zou
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Cardiovascular risk stratification in diabetic patients following stress single-photon emission-computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: the impact of achieved exercise level.

Authors:  Santosh K Padala; Abhijit Ghatak; Sandeep Padala; Deborah M Katten; Donna M Polk; Gary V Heller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Long-term mortality following normal exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT according to coronary disease risk factors.

Authors:  Alan Rozanski; Heidi Gransar; James K Min; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Louise E J Thomson; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 5.952
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the journal of nuclear cardiology in 2015. Part 1 of 2: Plaque imaging, positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Comparative analysis of full-time, half-time, and quarter-time myocardial ECG-gated SPECT quantification in normal-weight and overweight patients.

Authors:  M Lecchi; I Martinelli; O Zoccarato; C Maioli; Giovanni Lucignani; A Del Sole
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Review of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2016. Part 1 of 2: Positron Emission Tomography, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Wael AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2018. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the journal of nuclear cardiology in 2016: Part 2 of 2-myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Review of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2015-Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2017. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2017. Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Wael A AlJaroudi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2020: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Wael A AlJaroudi; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 5.952
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.