Literature DB >> 24925167

Role of emergency ureteroscopy in the management of ureteric stones: analysis of 394 cases.

Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari1, William Anderson1, Michael Rice1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the outcomes of emergency ureteroscopy (URS) cases performed in Auckland City Hospital.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all emergency URS procedures performed at Auckland City Hospital between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2011. Data on patients, stones and procedures were collected and analysed. Emergency URS failure was defined as fragments >3 mm or the need for a repeat procedure.
RESULTS: A total of 499 URS procedures were identified. Of these 394 (79%) were emergency procedures. The mean (sd; range) patient age was 48 (16; 13-88) years. In all, 83% of emergency URS cases had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 1 or 2, 25% of stones were >9 mm, with a mean (sd) size of 8 (4) mm, and 285 procedures (72%) were successful. These patients were younger (47 vs 51 years), were more likely to have an ASA score of 1 (103 patients in the successful treatment group vs 26 in the failed treatment group), had smaller stones (7 vs 9 mm) and were more likely to have distal stones (P < 0.05). A total of 20 complications (5%) were recorded including six false passages and three mucosal injuries, one of which required radiological intervention, and 50 patients (13%) re-presented, for pain (76%), bleeding (10%) or infection (14%).
CONCLUSION: We showed that emergency URS is a feasible approach for the routine management of acute ureteric colic with a low complications rate. A subgroup of younger, healthier patients may benefit the most from the procedure.
© 2014 The Authors. BJU International © 2014 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complication; emergency; ureteric colic; ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24925167     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

Review 1.  Evolving Guidance on Ureteric Calculi Management in the Acute Setting.

Authors:  Jonathan K Makanjuola; Sophie Rintoul-Hoad; Matthew Bultitude
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Davide Arcaniolo; Marco De Sio; Jens Rassweiler; Jilian Nicholas; Estevão Lima; Giuseppe Carrieri; Evangelos Liatsikos; Vincenzo Mirone; Manoj Monga; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Factors associated with postoperative pain after retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones.

Authors:  Ural Oğuz; Tolga Şahin; Çağrı Şenocak; Ekrem Özyuvalı; Ömer Faruk Bozkurt; Berkan Reşorlu; Ali Ünsal
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-07-31

4.  Predictors of surgical intervention following initial surveillance for acute ureteric colic.

Authors:  Mohit Bajaj; Lance Yuan; Lauren C Holmes; Michael Rice; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Predicting emergency interventions in patients with acute ureteral colic using acute renal colic scoring system in a Pakistani cohort.

Authors:  Roshane-Shahid Rana; Syed M Nazim; M Hammad Ather
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Complications associated with ureterorenoscopy (URS) related to treatment of urolithiasis: the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society URS Global study.

Authors:  B K Somani; G Giusti; Y Sun; P J Osther; M Frank; M De Sio; B Turna; J de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Emergency vs elective ureteroscopy for a single ureteric stone.

Authors:  Abdullatif Al-Terki; Majd Alkabbani; Talal A Alenezi; Tariq F Al-Shaiji; Shabir Al-Mousawi; Ahmed R El-Nahas
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2020-08-25

8.  Contributions to expenditure in endoscopic stone management: a costly process.

Authors:  Romy Mondschein; Damien Bolton; Sarah Tan; Minh Hang Vu; Philip McCahy
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.861

9.  RE: Semi-rigid ureteroscopy - Proximal versus distal ureteral stone.

Authors:  Mohd Nazli Kamarulzaman
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

10.  Comparison of prone vs. supine unenhanced CT imaging in patients with clinically suspected ureterolithiasis.

Authors:  Matthias Meissnitzer; Thomas Meissnitzer; Stephan Hruby; Stefan Hecht; Andreas Gutzeit; Laura Holzer-Frühwald; Klaus Hergan; Rosemarie Forstner
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.