PURPOSE: We report a series of techniques to reliably eliminate artifacts in interleaved echo-planar imaging (EPI) based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). METHODS: First, we integrate the previously reported multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE) algorithm with a new adaptive Homodyne partial-Fourier reconstruction algorithm, so that images reconstructed from interleaved partial-Fourier DWI data are free from artifacts even in the presence of either (a) motion-induced k-space energy peak displacement, or (b) susceptibility field gradient induced fast phase changes. Second, we generalize the previously reported single-band MUSE framework to multiband MUSE, so that both through-plane and in-plane aliasing artifacts in multiband multishot interleaved DWI data can be effectively eliminated. RESULTS: The new adaptive Homodyne-MUSE reconstruction algorithm reliably produces high-quality and high-resolution DWI, eliminating residual artifacts in images reconstructed with previously reported methods. Furthermore, the generalized MUSE algorithm is compatible with multiband and high-throughput DWI. CONCLUSION: The integration of the multiband and adaptive Homodyne-MUSE algorithms significantly improves the spatial-resolution, image quality, and scan throughput of interleaved DWI. We expect that the reported reconstruction framework will play an important role in enabling high-resolution DWI for both neuroscience research and clinical uses.
PURPOSE: We report a series of techniques to reliably eliminate artifacts in interleaved echo-planar imaging (EPI) based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). METHODS: First, we integrate the previously reported multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE) algorithm with a new adaptive Homodyne partial-Fourier reconstruction algorithm, so that images reconstructed from interleaved partial-Fourier DWI data are free from artifacts even in the presence of either (a) motion-induced k-space energy peak displacement, or (b) susceptibility field gradient induced fast phase changes. Second, we generalize the previously reported single-band MUSE framework to multiband MUSE, so that both through-plane and in-plane aliasing artifacts in multiband multishot interleaved DWI data can be effectively eliminated. RESULTS: The new adaptive Homodyne-MUSE reconstruction algorithm reliably produces high-quality and high-resolution DWI, eliminating residual artifacts in images reconstructed with previously reported methods. Furthermore, the generalized MUSE algorithm is compatible with multiband and high-throughput DWI. CONCLUSION: The integration of the multiband and adaptive Homodyne-MUSE algorithms significantly improves the spatial-resolution, image quality, and scan throughput of interleaved DWI. We expect that the reported reconstruction framework will play an important role in enabling high-resolution DWI for both neuroscience research and clinical uses.
Authors: Felix A Breuer; Martin Blaimer; Robin M Heidemann; Matthias F Mueller; Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: K Setsompop; R Kimmlingen; E Eberlein; T Witzel; J Cohen-Adad; J A McNab; B Keil; M D Tisdall; P Hoecht; P Dietz; S F Cauley; V Tountcheva; V Matschl; V H Lenz; K Heberlein; A Potthast; H Thein; J Van Horn; A Toga; F Schmitt; D Lehne; B R Rosen; V Wedeen; L L Wald Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Steen Moeller; Essa Yacoub; Cheryl A Olman; Edward Auerbach; John Strupp; Noam Harel; Kâmil Uğurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: David Atkinson; Serena Counsell; Joseph V Hajnal; Philip G Batchelor; Derek L G Hill; David J Larkman Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: David A Feinberg; Steen Moeller; Stephen M Smith; Edward Auerbach; Sudhir Ramanna; Matthias Gunther; Matt F Glasser; Karla L Miller; Kamil Ugurbil; Essa Yacoub Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-12-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lukas Filli; Moritz C Wurnig; Roger Luechinger; Christian Eberhardt; Roman Guggenberger; Andreas Boss Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-01-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M Herbst; B A Poser; A Singh; W Deng; B Knowles; M Zaitsev; V A Stenger; T Ernst Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Yuxin Hu; Evan G Levine; Qiyuan Tian; Catherine J Moran; Xiaole Wang; Valentina Taviani; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Jennifer A McNab; Bruce A Daniel; Brian L Hargreaves Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 4.668