Literature DB >> 24922117

New symptom-based predictive tool for survival at seven and thirty days developed by palliative home care teams.

Maria Nabal1, Mar Bescos, Miquel Barcons, Pilar Torrubia, Javier Trujillano, Antonio Requena.   

Abstract

AIM: This study sought to develop models to predict survival at 7 and 30 days based on symptoms detected by palliative home care teams (PHCTs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective analytic study included a 6-month recruitment period with patient monitoring until death or 180 days after recruitment. The inclusion criteria consisted of age greater than 18 years, advanced cancer, and treatment provided by participating PHCTs between April and July 2009. The study variables included death at 7 or 30 days, survival time, age, gender, place of residence, type of tumor and extension, presence of 11 signs and symptoms measured with a 0-3 Likert scale, functional and cognitive status, and use of a subcutaneous butterfly needle. The statistics applied included a descriptive analysis according to the percentage or mean±standard deviation. For symptom comparison between surviving and nonsurviving patients, the χ(2) test was used. Classification and regression tree (CART) methodology was used for model development. An internal validation system (cross-validation with 10 partitions) was used to ensure generalization of the models. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was calculated (with a 95% confidence interval) to assess the validation of the models.
RESULTS: A total of 698 patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 73.7±12 years, and 60.3% were male. The most frequent type of neoplasm was digestive (37.6%). The mean Karnofsky score was 51.8±14, the patients' cognitive status according to the Pfeiffer test was 2.6±4 errors, and 8.3% of patients required a subcutaneous butterfly needle. Each model provided 8 decision rules with a probability assignment range between 2.2% and 99.1%. The model used to predict the probability of death at 7 days included the presence of anorexia and dysphagia and the level of consciousness, and this model produced areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.88 (0.86-0.90) and 0.81 (0.79-0.83). The model used to predict the probability of death at 30 days included the presence of asthenia and anorexia and the level of consciousness, and this model produced AUCs of 0.78 (0.77-0.80) and 0.77 (0.75-0.79).
CONCLUSION: For patients with advanced cancer treated by PHCTs, the use of classification schemes and decision trees based on specific symptoms can help clinicians predict survival at 7 and 30 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24922117      PMCID: PMC4195345          DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  20 in total

1.  Lactate dehydrogenase as a prognostic factor for survival time of terminally ill cancer patients: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Sang-Yeon Suh; Hong-Yup Ahn
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 2.  [Approach to the methodology of classification and regression trees].

Authors:  Javier Trujillano; Antonio Sarria-Santamera; Aureli Esquerda; Mariona Badia; Matilde Palma; Jaume March
Journal:  Gac Sanit       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.139

3.  Development and validation of a prognostic scale for use in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  P Stone; L Kelly; R Head; S White
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.762

4.  Palliative performance scale (PPS): a new tool.

Authors:  F Anderson; G M Downing; J Hill; L Casorso; N Lerch
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.250

Review 5.  Predicting prognosis in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  P C Stone; S Lund
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  A new palliative prognostic score: a first step for the staging of terminally ill cancer patients. Italian Multicenter and Study Group on Palliative Care.

Authors:  M Pirovano; M Maltoni; O Nanni; M Marinari; M Indelli; G Zaninetta; V Petrella; S Barni; E Zecca; E Scarpi; R Labianca; D Amadori; G Luporini
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for terminally ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Jaime Feliu; Ana María Jiménez-Gordo; Rosario Madero; José Ramón Rodríguez-Aizcorbe; Enrique Espinosa; Javier Castro; Jesús Domingo Acedo; Beatriz Martínez; Alberto Alonso-Babarro; Raquel Molina; Juan Carlos Cámara; María Luisa García-Paredes; Manuel González-Barón
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Prediction of survival in terminal cancer patients in Taiwan: constructing a prognostic scale.

Authors:  Rong-Bin Chuang; Wen-Yu Hu; Tai-Yuan Chiu; Ching-Yu Chen
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 9.  A systematic review of physicians' survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Paul Glare; Kiran Virik; Mark Jones; Malcolm Hudson; Steffen Eychmuller; John Simes; Nicholas Christakis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-26

Review 10.  Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.

Authors:  N Cullum; E McInnes; S E M Bell-Syer; R Legood
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004
View more
  1 in total

1.  Prevalence of oral mucositis, dry mouth, and dysphagia in advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  Sebastiano Mercadante; Federica Aielli; Claudio Adile; Patrizia Ferrera; Alessandro Valle; Flavio Fusco; Amanda Caruselli; Claudio Cartoni; Pizzuto Massimo; Francesco Masedu; Marco Valenti; Giampiero Porzio
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.603

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.