Literature DB >> 21972226

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for terminally ill cancer patients.

Jaime Feliu1, Ana María Jiménez-Gordo, Rosario Madero, José Ramón Rodríguez-Aizcorbe, Enrique Espinosa, Javier Castro, Jesús Domingo Acedo, Beatriz Martínez, Alberto Alonso-Babarro, Raquel Molina, Juan Carlos Cámara, María Luisa García-Paredes, Manuel González-Barón.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Determining life expectancy in terminally ill cancer patients is a difficult task. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the length of survival in patients with terminal disease.
METHODS: From February 1, 2003, to December 31, 2005, 406 consecutive terminally ill patients were entered into the study. We analyzed 38 features prognostic of life expectancy among terminally ill patients by multivariable Cox regression and identified the most accurate and parsimonious model by backward variable elimination according to the Akaike information criterion. Five clinical and laboratory variables were built into a nomogram to estimate the probability of patient survival at 15, 30, and 60 days. We validated and calibrated the nomogram with an external validation cohort of 474 patients who were treated from June 1, 2006, through December 31, 2007.
RESULTS: The median overall survival was 29.1 days for the training set and 18.3 days for the validation set. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, lactate dehydrogenase levels, lymphocyte levels, albumin levels, and time from initial diagnosis to diagnosis of terminal disease were retained in the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model as independent prognostic factors of survival and formed the basis of the nomogram. The nomogram had high predictive performance, with a bootstrapped corrected concordance index of 0.70, and it showed good calibration. External independent validation revealed 68% predictive accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed a highly accurate tool that uses basic clinical and analytical information to predict the probability of survival at 15, 30, and 60 days in terminally ill cancer patients. This tool can help physicians making decisions on clinical care at the end of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21972226     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  33 in total

1.  Chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: too close to death?

Authors:  M Frigeri; S De Dosso; O Castillo-Fernandez; K Feuerlein; H Neuenschwander; P Saletti
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Predicting life expectancy in patients with metastatic cancer receiving palliative radiotherapy: the TEACHH model.

Authors:  Monica S Krishnan; Zachary Epstein-Peterson; Yu-Hui Chen; Yolanda D Tseng; Alexi A Wright; Jennifer S Temel; Paul Catalano; Tracy A Balboni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Nutrition, hydration, and patient's preferences at the end of life.

Authors:  Federico Bozzetti
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Development and validation of a prognostic scale for hospitalized patients with terminally ill cancer in China.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Qingsong Xi; Shu Xia; Xushi Wang; Yong Liu; Chao Huang; Wei Zheng; Shiying Yu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Predictive Modeling for Comfortable Death Outcome Using Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Muhammad Kamran Lodhi; Rashid Ansari; Yingwei Yao; Gail M Keenan; Diana J Wilkie; Ashfaq A Khokhar
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Congr Big Data       Date:  2015 Jun-Jul

6.  Predictive Modeling for End-of-Life Pain Outcome using Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Muhammad K Lodhi; Janet Stifter; Yingwei Yao; Rashid Ansari; Gail M Kee-Nan; Diana J Wilkie; Ashfaq A Khokhar
Journal:  Adv Data Min       Date:  2015-06-20

7.  New symptom-based predictive tool for survival at seven and thirty days developed by palliative home care teams.

Authors:  Maria Nabal; Mar Bescos; Miquel Barcons; Pilar Torrubia; Javier Trujillano; Antonio Requena
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Prediction of survival in terminally ill cancer patients at the time of terminal cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Yu Jung Kim; Su-Jung Kim; June Koo Lee; Won-Suk Choi; Jin Hyun Park; Hee Jun Kim; Sung Hoon Sim; Keun-Wook Lee; Se-Hoon Lee; Jee Hyun Kim; Dong-Wan Kim; Jong Seok Lee; Yung-Jue Bang; Dae Seog Heo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  Dealing with prognostic uncertainty: the role of prognostic models and websites for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  David Hui; John P Maxwell; Carlos Eduardo Paiva
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.302

10.  Infomarkers for transition to goals consistent with palliative care in dying patients.

Authors:  Yingwei Yao; Janet Stifter; Miriam O Ezenwa; Muhammad Lodhi; Ashfaq Khokhar; Rashid Ansari; Gail M Keenan; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2015-02-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.