Literature DB >> 24920641

External validation of a multiplex urinary protein panel for the detection of bladder cancer in a multicenter cohort.

Li-Mei Chen1, Myron Chang2, Yunfeng Dai2, Karl X Chai1, Lars Dyrskjøt3, Marta Sanchez-Carbayo4, Tibor Szarvas5, Ellen C Zwarthoff6, Vinata Lokeshwar7, Carmen Jeronimo8, Alexander S Parker9, Shanti Ross10, Michael Borre3, Torben F Orntoft3, Tobias Jaeger5, Willemien Beukers6, Luis E Lopez7, Rui Henrique8, Paul R Young9, Virginia Urquidi11, Steve Goodison12, Charles J Rosser13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because of the faltering sensitivity and/or specificity, urine-based assays currently have a limited role in the management of patients with bladder cancer. The aim of this study was to externally validate our previously reported protein biomarker panel from multiple sites in the United States and Europe.
METHODS: This multicenter external validation study included a total of 320 subjects (bladder cancer = 183). The 10 biomarkers (IL8, MMP9, MMP10, SERPINA1, VEGFA, ANG, CA9, APOE, SDC1, and SERPINE1) were measured using commercial ELISA assays in an external laboratory. The diagnostic performance of the biomarker panel was assessed using receiver operator curves (ROC) and descriptive statistical values.
RESULTS: Utilizing the combination of all 10 biomarkers, the area under the ROC for the diagnostic panel was noted to be 0.847 (95% confidence interval, 0.796-0.899), outperforming any single biomarker. The multiplex assay at optimal cutoff value achieved an overall sensitivity of 0.79, specificity of 0.79, positive prediction value of 0.73, and negative prediction value of 0.84 for bladder cancer classification. Sensitivity values of the diagnostic panel for high-grade bladder cancer, low-grade bladder cancer, muscle invasive bladder cancer, and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer were 0.81, 0.90, 0.95, and 0.77, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Urinary levels of the biomarker panel enabled discrimination of patients with bladder cancer and controls, and the levels of biomarker subsets were associated with advancing tumor grade and stage. IMPACT: If proven to be reliable, urinary diagnostic biomarker assays can detect bladder cancer in a timely manner such that the patient can expect improvements in overall survival and quality of life. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24920641      PMCID: PMC4154967          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  64 in total

1.  Bladder tumor markers beyond cytology: International Consensus Panel on bladder tumor markers.

Authors:  Vinata B Lokeshwar; Tomonori Habuchi; H Barton Grossman; William M Murphy; Stefan H Hautmann; George P Hemstreet; Aldo V Bono; Robert H Getzenberg; Peter Goebell; Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger; Jack A Schalken; Yves Fradet; Michael Marberger; Edward Messing; Michael J Droller
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Tumor interactions with the vasculature: angiogenesis and tumor metastasis.

Authors:  C H Blood; B R Zetter
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1990-06-01

Review 3.  Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis.

Authors:  D Hanahan; J Folkman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-08-09       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Urine markers for bladder cancer surveillance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bas W G van Rhijn; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  TCF21 and PCDH17 methylation: An innovative panel of biomarkers for a simultaneous detection of urological cancers.

Authors:  Vera L Costa; Rui Henrique; Stine Aske Danielsen; Mette Eknaes; Patrícia Patrício; António Morais; Jorge Oliveira; Ragnhild A Lothe; Manuel R Teixeira; Guro E Lind; Carmen Jerónimo
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.528

6.  Should we screen for bladder cancer in a high-risk population?: A cost per life-year saved analysis.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Robert S Svatek; Arthur I Sagalowsky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Urinary interleukin-8 levels are elevated in subjects with transitional cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Elinore Sheryka; Marcia A Wheeler; Derek A Hausladen; Robert M Weiss
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 9.  Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease.

Authors:  J Folkman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Measurements of complement factor H-related protein (BTA-TRAK assay) and nuclear matrix protein (NMP22 assay)--useful diagnostic tools in the diagnosis of urinary bladder cancer?

Authors:  Brigitte Mahnert; Stephan Tauber; Martin Kriegmair; Dorothea Nagel; Stefan Holdenrieder; Karin Hofmann; Wolfgang Reiter; Nikolaus Schmeller; Petra Stieber
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Developing proteomic biomarkers for bladder cancer: towards clinical application.

Authors:  Maria Frantzi; Agnieszka Latosinska; Leif Flühe; Marie C Hupe; Elena Critselis; Mario W Kramer; Axel S Merseburger; Harald Mischak; Antonia Vlahou
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  A Nomogram Derived by Combination of Demographic and Biomarker Data Improves the Noninvasive Evaluation of Patients at Risk for Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Sijia Huang; Lei Kou; Hideki Furuya; Changhong Yu; Steve Goodison; Michael W Kattan; Lana Garmire; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Metabolomic Approaches for Detection and Identification of Biomarkers and Altered Pathways in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Nicola Antonio di Meo; Davide Loizzo; Savio Domenico Pandolfo; Riccardo Autorino; Matteo Ferro; Camillo Porta; Alessandro Stella; Cinzia Bizzoca; Leonardo Vincenti; Felice Crocetto; Octavian Sabin Tataru; Monica Rutigliano; Michele Battaglia; Pasquale Ditonno; Giuseppe Lucarelli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Validation and clinicopathologic associations of a urine-based bladder cancer biomarker signature.

Authors:  Ge Zhang; Evan Gomes-Giacoia; Yunfeng Dai; Adrienne Lawton; Makito Miyake; Hideki Furuya; Steve Goodison; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.644

5.  A multiplex urinary immunoassay for bladder cancer detection: analysis of a Japanese cohort.

Authors:  Steve Goodison; Osamu Ogawa; Yoshiyuki Matsui; Takashi Kobayashi; Makito Miyake; Sayuri Ohnishi; Kiyohide Fujimoto; Yunfeng Dai; Yoshiko Shimizu; Kazue Tsukikawa; Hideki Furuya; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  Meta-analysis of a 10-plex urine-based biomarker assay for the detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Norihiko Masuda; Osamu Ogawa; Meyeon Park; Alvin Y Liu; Steve Goodison; Yunfeng Dai; Landon Kozai; Hideki Furuya; Yair Lotan; Charles J Rosser; Takashi Kobayashi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-03

7.  A multiplex immunoassay for the non-invasive detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiko Shimizu; Hideki Furuya; Peter Bryant Greenwood; Owen Chan; Yunfeng Dai; Mark D Thornquist; Steve Goodison; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  CXCL1 is elevated in the urine of bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Andre Burnier; Yoshiko Shimizu; Yunfeng Dai; Masakazu Nakashima; Yoshiyuki Matsui; Osamu Ogawa; Charles J Rosser; Hideki Furuya
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-10-15

9.  A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Urinary Protein Biomarkers in Urothelial Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Jamie J D'Costa; James C Goldsmith; Jayne S Wilson; Richard T Bryan; Douglas G Ward
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2016-07-27

10.  Association of MMP-2, RB and PAI-1 with decreased recurrence-free survival and overall survival in bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Owen T M Chan; Hideki Furuya; Ian Pagano; Yoshiko Shimizu; Kanani Hokutan; Lars Dyrskjøt; Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen; Per-Uno Malmstrom; Ulrika Segersten; Filip Janku; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.