Literature DB >> 12636058

Measurements of complement factor H-related protein (BTA-TRAK assay) and nuclear matrix protein (NMP22 assay)--useful diagnostic tools in the diagnosis of urinary bladder cancer?

Brigitte Mahnert1, Stephan Tauber, Martin Kriegmair, Dorothea Nagel, Stefan Holdenrieder, Karin Hofmann, Wolfgang Reiter, Nikolaus Schmeller, Petra Stieber.   

Abstract

Between 1997 and 2000 we investigated in a prospective study the voided urine samples of all consecutive patients undergoing cystoscopy independent from their clinical background (n = 705) with the BTA-TRAK assay (Bard Diagnostics, Redmont, USA) detecting a complement factor H-related protein (CFHrP) and the NMP22 assay (Matritech, Newton, USA) measuring a nuclear matrix protein, which is supposed to be specific for bladder cancer. The individuals were divided into three groups concerning the clinical background: 233 patients had urological diseases, 268 patients had urinary bladder cancer and 150 patients had other urological malignancies. Based on the clinical findings we compared our results with well established diagnostic methods for urinary bladder cancer such as cytology and the detection of hematuria. In addition, we investigated urine samples from 30 healthy individuals and 24 patients with urinary tract infection without performing cystoscopy. Following the recommendations of the European Group on Tumor Markers we used 95% specificity for benign urological diseases and urinary tract infections, which resulted in a sensitivity of 17% for active bladder cancer for the BTA-TRAK assay and 31% for NMP22. We compared these results with the detection of hematuria (specificity: 72%) and cytology, which had a sensitivity of 64% and 89%, respectively. Subsequently, we calculated sensitivity and specificity for the detection of relapse of the disease. Again using 95% specificity, in this case for patients with no evidence of disease (NED), in patients with recurrent disease the BTA-TRAK assay showed 8% sensitivity as compared to 12% for the NMP22 assay. Due to an insufficient specificity and sensitivity, both tests can neither be clinically useful in screening of high risk patients, nor in primary diagnosis of bladder cancer. They cannot replace neither cystoscopy nor cytology. In the follow-up care more investigations may be necessary to prove the benefit of existing diagnostic strategies for the discrimination between active and inactive bladder cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12636058     DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2003.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of nuclear matrix proteins between gastric cancer and normal gastric tissue.

Authors:  Qin-Xian Zhang; Yi Ding; Zhuo Li; Xiao-Ping Le; Wei Zhang; Ling Sun; Hui-Rong Shi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Developing urinary metabolomic signatures as early bladder cancer diagnostic markers.

Authors:  Chong Shen; Zeyu Sun; Deying Chen; Xiaoling Su; Jing Jiang; Gonghui Li; Biaoyang Lin; Jiajun Yan
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2015-01

3.  External validation of a multiplex urinary protein panel for the detection of bladder cancer in a multicenter cohort.

Authors:  Li-Mei Chen; Myron Chang; Yunfeng Dai; Karl X Chai; Lars Dyrskjøt; Marta Sanchez-Carbayo; Tibor Szarvas; Ellen C Zwarthoff; Vinata Lokeshwar; Carmen Jeronimo; Alexander S Parker; Shanti Ross; Michael Borre; Torben F Orntoft; Tobias Jaeger; Willemien Beukers; Luis E Lopez; Rui Henrique; Paul R Young; Virginia Urquidi; Steve Goodison; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Diagnostic value of urinary microRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingxia Ding; Yi Li; Haifeng Wang; Yongchang Lv; Jianwei Liang; Jiansong Wang; Chong Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

5.  Urinary BTA: indicator of bladder cancer or of hematuria.

Authors:  Makito Miyake; Steve Goodison; Wasia Rizwani; Shanti Ross; H Bart Grossman; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  [Expression of the tumormarker p16INK4a in cytology specimens of the urinary bladder. A new means for early recognition and surveillance of urothelial cancer].

Authors:  S Tauber; C Brunken; M Vierbuchen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  IL-8 as a urinary biomarker for the detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Virginia Urquidi; Myron Chang; Yunfeng Dai; Jeongsoon Kim; Edward D Wolfson; Steve Goodison; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 8.  Bladder cancer detection and monitoring: assessment of urine- and blood-based marker tests.

Authors:  Steve Goodison; Charles J Rosser; Virginia Urquidi
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 9.  Biomarkers for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: Current tests and future promise.

Authors:  Fadi Darwiche; Dipen J Parekh; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

10.  A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Urinary Protein Biomarkers in Urothelial Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Jamie J D'Costa; James C Goldsmith; Jayne S Wilson; Richard T Bryan; Douglas G Ward
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2016-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.