Literature DB >> 27383773

A Nomogram Derived by Combination of Demographic and Biomarker Data Improves the Noninvasive Evaluation of Patients at Risk for Bladder Cancer.

Sijia Huang1, Lei Kou2, Hideki Furuya3, Changhong Yu2, Steve Goodison4, Michael W Kattan2, Lana Garmire1, Charles J Rosser5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improvements in the noninvasive clinical evaluation of patients at risk for bladder cancer would be of benefit both to individuals and to health care systems. We investigated the potential utility of a hybrid nomogram that combined key demographic features with the results of a multiplex urinary biomarker assay in hopes of identifying patients at risk of harboring bladder cancer.
METHODS: Logistic regression analysis was used to model the probability of bladder cancer burden in a cohort of 686 subjects (394 with bladder cancer) using key demographic features alone, biomarker data alone, and the combination of demographic features and key biomarker data. We examined discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis techniques to evaluate prediction model performance.
RESULTS: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analyses revealed that demographic features alone predicted tumor burden with an accuracy of 0.806 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.76-0.85], while biomarker data had an accuracy of 0.835 (95% CI, 0.80-0.87). The addition of molecular data into the nomogram improved the predictive performance to 0.891 (95% CI, 0.86-0.92). Decision curve analyses showed that the hybrid nomogram performed better than demographic or biomarker data alone.
CONCLUSION: A nomogram construction strategy that combines key demographic features with biomarker data may facilitate the accurate, noninvasive evaluation of patients at risk of harboring bladder cancer. Further research is needed to evaluate the bladder cancer risk nomogram for potential clinical utility. IMPACT: The application of such a nomogram may better inform the decision to perform invasive diagnostic procedures. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(9); 1361-6. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27383773      PMCID: PMC5106243          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  30 in total

Review 1.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Urine markers for bladder cancer surveillance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bas W G van Rhijn; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests.

Authors:  F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Pryor; K L Lee; R A Rosati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Nomograms including nuclear matrix protein 22 for prediction of disease recurrence and progression in patients with Ta, T1 or CIS transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Craig Zippe; Gerson Lüdecke; Hans Boman; Marta Sanchez-Carbayo; Roberto Casella; Christine Mian; Martin G Friedrich; Sanaa Eissa; Hideyuki Akaza; Ihor Sawczuk; Vincenzo Serretta; Hartwig Huland; Hans Hedelin; Raina Rupesh; Naoto Miyanaga; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Frank Wians; Claus G Roehrborn; Yair Lotan; Paul Perrotte; Serge Benayoun; Michael J Marberger; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  A candidate molecular biomarker panel for the detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Virginia Urquidi; Steve Goodison; Yunpeng Cai; Yijun Sun; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Accuracy of urinary cytology in the diagnosis of primary and recurrent bladder cancer.

Authors:  H G Wiener; G P Vooijs; B van't Hof-Grootenboer
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.319

8.  Comparison of molecular subtyping with BluePrint, MammaPrint, and TargetPrint to local clinical subtyping in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Bichlien Nguyen; Pino G Cusumano; Kenneth Deck; Deborah Kerlin; Agustin A Garcia; Julie L Barone; Edgardo Rivera; Katharine Yao; Femke A de Snoo; Jeroen van den Akker; Lisette Stork-Sloots; Daniele Generali
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Gene expression profiling of noninvasive primary urothelial tumours using microarrays.

Authors:  M Aaboe; N Marcussen; K M-E Jensen; T Thykjaer; L Dyrskjøt; T F Orntoft
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Identification of potential bladder cancer markers in urine by abundant-protein depletion coupled with quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Chien-Lun Chen; Tsung-Shih Lin; Cheng-Han Tsai; Chih-Ching Wu; Ting Chung; Kun-Yi Chien; Maureen Wu; Yu-Sun Chang; Jau-Song Yu; Yi-Ting Chen
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 4.044

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Ten Years of Proteomics in Bladder Cancer: Progress and Future Directions.

Authors:  Maria Frantzi; Antonia Vlahou
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2017-01-27

2.  Meta-analysis of a 10-plex urine-based biomarker assay for the detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Norihiko Masuda; Osamu Ogawa; Meyeon Park; Alvin Y Liu; Steve Goodison; Yunfeng Dai; Landon Kozai; Hideki Furuya; Yair Lotan; Charles J Rosser; Takashi Kobayashi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-03

3.  A Prediction Rule for Overall Survival in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with a Pathological Tumor Size Less Than 30 mm.

Authors:  Wang-Yu Zhu; Ke-Xin Fang; Jian-Ying He; Ri Cui; Yong-Kui Zhang; Han-Bo Le
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.434

4.  Diagnostic performance of Oncuria™, a urinalysis test for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Yosuke Hirasawa; Ian Pagano; Runpu Chen; Yijun Sun; Yunfeng Dai; Amit Gupta; Sergei Tikhonenkov; Steve Goodison; Charles J Rosser; Hideki Furuya
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 5.531

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.