Literature DB >> 21456955

Exposure assessment of workplaces manufacturing nanosized TiO2 and silver.

Ji Hyun Lee1, Miran Kwon, Jun Ho Ji, Chang Soo Kang, Kang Ho Ahn, Jeong Hee Han, Il Je Yu.   

Abstract

With the increased production and widespread use of nanomaterials, human and environmental exposure to nanomaterials is inevitably increasing. Therefore, this study monitored the possible exposure to nanoparticles at workplaces that manufacture nano-TiO(2) and nano-silver. To estimate the potential exposure of workers, personal sampling, area monitoring, and real-time monitoring using a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) and dust monitor were conducted at workplaces where the workers handle nanomaterials. The gravimetric concentrations of TiO(2) ranged from 0.10 to 4.99 mg/m(3), which were lower than the occupational exposure limit 10 mg/m(3) set by the Korean Ministry of Labor or American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). Meanwhile, the silver metal concentrations ranged from 0.00002 to 0.00118 mg/m(3), which were also lower than the silver dust 0.1 mg/m(3) and silver soluble compound 0.01 mg/m(3) occupational exposure limits set by the ACGIH. The particle number concentrations at the nano-TiO(2) manufacturing workplaces ranged from 11,418 to 45,889 particles/cm(3) with a size range of 15-710.5 nm during the reaction, although the concentration decreased to 14,000 particles/cm(3) when the reaction was stopped. The particle concentrations at the TiO(2) manufacturing workplaces increased during the reactor and vacuum pump operations, and during the collection of the synthesized TiO(2) particles. Similarly, the particle concentrations at the silver nanoparticle manufacturing workplaces increased when the sodium citrates were weighed or reacted with the silver nitrates, and during the cleaning of the workplace. The number of silver nanoparticles in the samples obtained from the workplace manufacturing silver nanoparticles using induced coupled plasma ranged from 57,789 to 2,373,309 particles/cm(3) inside the reactor with an average size of 20-30 nm and 535-25,022 particles/cm(3) with a wide range of particle sizes due to agglomeration or aggregation after the release of nanoparticles into the workplace air. In contrast, the silver nanoparticles manufactured by the wet method ranged from 393 to 3526 particle/cm(3) with an average size of 50 nm. Thus, when taken together, the TiO(2) and silver nanoparticle concentrations were relatively lower than existing occupational exposure limits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21456955     DOI: 10.3109/08958378.2011.562567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inhal Toxicol        ISSN: 0895-8378            Impact factor:   2.724


  27 in total

1.  Pulmonary effects of silver nanoparticle size, coating, and dose over time upon intratracheal instillation.

Authors:  Rona M Silva; Donald S Anderson; Lisa M Franzi; Janice L Peake; Patricia C Edwards; Laura S Van Winkle; Kent E Pinkerton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Control Banding Tools for Engineered Nanoparticles: What the Practitioner Needs to Know.

Authors:  Kevin H Dunn; Adrienne C Eastlake; Michael Story; Eileen D Kuempel
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.179

3.  Current state of knowledge on the health effects of engineered nanomaterials in workers: a systematic review of human studies and epidemiological investigations.

Authors:  Paul A Schulte; Veruscka Leso; Mamadou Niang; Ivo Iavicoli
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  Protection factor for N95 filtering facepiece respirators exposed to laboratory aerosols containing different concentrations of nanoparticles.

Authors:  Samy Rengasamy; Gary Walbert; William Newcomb; Christopher Coffey; James Terrence Wassell; Jonathan Szalajda
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-11-25

Review 5.  Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review of current toxicological data.

Authors:  Hongbo Shi; Ruth Magaye; Vincent Castranova; Jinshun Zhao
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 9.400

6.  Aerosolized Silver Nanoparticles in the Rat Lung and Pulmonary Responses over Time.

Authors:  Rona M Silva; Donald S Anderson; Janice Peake; Patricia C Edwards; Esther S Patchin; Ting Guo; Terry Gordon; Lung Chi Chen; Xiaolin Sun; Laura S Van Winkle; Kent E Pinkerton
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 1.902

7.  Analysis of metallic and metal oxide nanomaterial environmental emissions.

Authors:  Thabet Tolaymat; Amro El Badawy; Ash Genaidy; Wael Abdelraheem; Reynold Swqueria
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 9.297

8.  Assessing the first wave of epidemiological studies of nanomaterial workers.

Authors:  Saou-Hsing Liou; Candace S J Tsai; Daniela Pelclova; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Paul A Schulte
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.253

9.  Exposure controls for nanomaterials at three manufacturing sites.

Authors:  William A Heitbrink; Li-Ming Lo; Kevin H Dunn
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 10.  Clinical and Forensic Aspects of the Different Subtypes of Argyria.

Authors:  Luís Mota; Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.