Literature DB >> 12671355

Expansive laminoplasty as a method for managing cervical multilevel spondylotic myelopathy.

Juan Antonio Martin-Benlloch1, Jose Ignacio Maruenda-Paulino, Amariel Barra-Pla, Manuel Laguia-Garzaran.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study evaluated 12 patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent Kurokawa's procedure using hydroxyapatite spacers and performed with T-saw thread wire.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of Kurokawa's laminoplasty for patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy using the T-saw, and to determine the radiographic and clinical factors that correlate with the prognosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinous process-splitting laminoplasty as an alternative or a combined method with an anterior approach was evaluated for the management of multilevel stenosis of the cervical spine.
METHODS: This study involved 12 patients (10 men and 2 women) with multilevel spondylotic myelopathy managed with expansive laminoplasty using the T-saw to open the spinous process. The mean age of the patients was 56 years. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 2 years. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scan were performed for all the patients. Clinical status and mobility after surgery also were evaluated. The average duration of symptoms was 3 years (range, 3 months to 5 years).
RESULTS: Nine patients had five levels of decompression (C3-C7), and three patients had four levels of decompression: C3-C6 (2 patients) and C4-C7 (1 patient). The mean duration of surgery was 3 hours. No cases of postoperative kyphosis, instability, or neurologic deficit were found. All the patients had a decrease of at least one level. The mean Nurick Functional Disability Score improved from 2.8 (range, 2-4) before surgery to 1.2 (range 1-3) after surgery. Verification of the canal expansion was measured using the increase of the spinal canal-vertebral body ratio at each level from C3 to C7 in nine patients, from C3 to C6 in two patients, and from C4 to C7 in one patient. After surgery, it was possible to make a comparison by measuring the osseous canal directly with computed tomography scans and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. The levels of myelomalacia assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in all the patients was 2.5 before surgery, and less than one level (range, 0-2) thereafter, the posterior movement of the spinal cord in all the patients at level C5 being 1.2 mm. At the latest follow-up evaluation, cervical motion assessed by plain radiographs in flexion and extension, both before and after surgery, decreased 29% (range, 25-32%).
CONCLUSIONS: Laminoplasty with the T-saw technique appears to be a good method for managing multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. This method is associated with a low rate of complications that also allows marked functional improvement in most patients. It can be used as a complement to anterior surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12671355     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000051913.55259.5F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Effectiveness of multiple-level decompression in laminoplasty and simultaneous C1 laminectomy for patients with cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Junwei Zhang; Shigeru Hirabayashi; Kunio Saiki; Hiroya Sakai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Long-term results of double-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacers in patients with compressive cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Atsushi Kimura; Atsushi Seichi; Hirokazu Inoue; Yuichi Hoshino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Keith D Luk; Vijay Kamath; Ashwin Avadhani; S Rajasekaran
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Anterior versus posterior surgery for multilevel cervical myelopathy, which one is better? A systematic review.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Wen Xu; Tao Cheng; Hui-Lin Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Chul Bum Cho; Chung Kee Chough; Jong Yang Oh; Hae Kwan Park; Kyung Jin Lee; Hyoung Kyun Rha
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-02-28

Review 6.  Axial pain after posterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shan-Jin Wang; Sheng-Dan Jiang; Lei-Sheng Jiang; Li-Yang Dai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The relationship between laminoplasty opening angle and increased sagittal canal diameter and the prediction of spinal canal expansion following double-door cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Zhen-Fang Gu; Ai-Li Zhang; Yong Shen; Wen-Yuan Ding; Feng Li; Xian-Ze Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Midline-Splitting Open Door Laminoplasty Using Hydroxyapatite Spacers : Comparison between Two Different Shaped Spacers.

Authors:  Jin Hoon Park; Sang Ryong Jeon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-07-31

9.  A Comparison of Implants Used in Double Door Laminoplasty : Allogeneic Bone Spacer versus Hydroxyapatite Spacer.

Authors:  Dong Yoon Lee; Chang Kyu Lee; In-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-10-24

10.  The Change of Range of Motion at Anterior Compression of the Cervical Cord after Laminoplasty in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Yongjae Cho
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2016-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.