Literature DB >> 24913809

Optimal timing of hormonal therapy for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Kazuhiro Matsumoto1, Ryuichi Mizuno, Nobuyuki Tanaka, Hiroki Ide, Masanori Hasegawa, Masaru Ishida, Nozomi Hayakawa, Yota Yasumizu, Masayuki Hagiwara, Satoshi Hara, Eiji Kikuchi, Akira Miyajima, Ken Nakagawa, Yosuke Nakajima, So Nakamura, Jun Nakashima, Mototsugu Oya.   

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to examine biochemical progression in patients who received salvage hormonal therapy (HT) for biochemical disease recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP), and to determine the optimal timing for the administration of HT. The study population consisted of 156 patients who underwent RP and received salvage HT for BCR. The starting point of this study was the timing of RP, and the endpoint was biochemical prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (castration-resistance) after HT. The mean follow-up period after surgery was 8.1 years. First, we excluded 18 patients with persistent PSA (≥ 0.2 ng/mL) after RP from an analysis below because their prognoses were significantly poorer compared with 138 patients whose PSA nadirs had reached <0.2 ng/mL. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Gleason score ≥ 8 (p = 0.010, hazard ratio (HR) 3.02), and PSA doubling time (PSA-DT) <6 months (p = 0.001, HR 7.39) was independently associated with subsequent biochemical progression after HT. Using these two variables (Gleason score and PSA-DT), we could stratify patients into three risk groups for BCR after salvage HT. Regarding the optimal timing for HT administration for these high-risk patients with both risk factors (relative risk = 22.3), the PSA cutpoint of 1.0 ng/mL at the initiation of HT showed a significant difference in progression-free survival rates (p = 0.023). The findings indicated that for high-risk patients, salvage HT for BCR after PSA nadir (<0.2 ng/mL) should be started before the PSA level exceeds 1.0 ng/mL; otherwise, there is a significant risk of subsequent biochemical progression after HT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24913809     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-014-0045-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  19 in total

1.  Evidence-based clinical practice Guidelines for Prostate Cancer (Summary - JUA 2006 Edition).

Authors:  Sadao Kamidono; Shinichi Ohshima; Yoshihiko Hirao; Kazuhiro Suzuki; Yoichi Arai; Hiroyuki Fujimoto; Shin Egawa; Hideyuki Akaza; Isao Hara; Shiro Hinotsu; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Tomonori Hasegawa
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.369

2.  Categorizing a prognostic variable: review of methods, code for easy implementation and applications to decision-making about cancer treatments.

Authors:  M Mazumdar; J R Glassman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  M Han; A W Partin; C R Pound; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Immediate versus deferred treatment for advanced prostatic cancer: initial results of the Medical Research Council Trial. The Medical Research Council Prostate Cancer Working Party Investigators Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1997-02

5.  Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C R Pound; A W Partin; M A Eisenberger; D W Chan; J D Pearson; P C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Surgically managed lymph node-positive prostate cancer: does delaying hormonal therapy worsen the outcome?

Authors:  Philippe E Spiess; Andrew K Lee; Joseph E Busby; Jennifer J Jordan; Mike Hernandez; Kristina Burt; Patricia Troncoso; Kelly W Merriman; Louis L Pisters
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Prognostic stratification in patients who received hormonal therapy for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hiroki Ide; Jun Nakashima; Hidaka Kono; Eiji Kikuchi; Hirohiko Nagata; Akira Miyajima; Ken Nakagawa; Mototsugu Oya
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Early versus delayed hormonal therapy for prostate specific antigen only recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Judd W Moul; Hongyu Wu; Leon Sun; David G McLeod; Christopher Amling; Timothy Donahue; Leo Kusuda; Wade Sexton; Keith O'Reilly; Javier Hernandez; Andrew Chung; Douglas Soderdahl
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Time to second prostate-specific antigen failure is a surrogate endpoint for prostate cancer death in a prospective trial of therapy for localized disease.

Authors:  A L Zietman; K C Dallow; P A McManus; N M Heney; W U Shipley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group.

Authors:  Howard I Scher; Susan Halabi; Ian Tannock; Michael Morris; Cora N Sternberg; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Celestia Higano; Glenn J Bubley; Robert Dreicer; Daniel Petrylak; Philip Kantoff; Ethan Basch; William Kevin Kelly; William D Figg; Eric J Small; Tomasz M Beer; George Wilding; Alison Martin; Maha Hussain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  1 in total

1.  Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anup Kumar; Srinivas Samavedi; Vladimir Mouraviev; Anthony S Bates; Rafael F Coelho; Bernardo Rocco; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-05-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.