Literature DB >> 17155975

Surgically managed lymph node-positive prostate cancer: does delaying hormonal therapy worsen the outcome?

Philippe E Spiess1, Andrew K Lee, Joseph E Busby, Jennifer J Jordan, Mike Hernandez, Kristina Burt, Patricia Troncoso, Kelly W Merriman, Louis L Pisters.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review our experience with the surgical management of lymph node-positive prostate cancer and to determine if there is a benefit to treating such patients with immediate rather than delayed hormonal therapy (HT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis from January 1982 to January 2001 identified 100 patients treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) either alone (70, 23 later received delayed HT) or combined with adjuvant (immediate) HT (30), with the overall median follow-up being 5.2 years.
RESULTS: The median patient age at diagnosis was 58.7 years, with 20% having clinical T3 disease, and the median prostate specific antigen (PSA) level at presentation was 10 ng/mL. In 41% of patients the Gleason score on prostatic biopsy was > or = 8. After RP, 30 patients received immediate HT used as an adjuvant after surgery in the absence of any evidence of disease progression, whereas 23 received delayed HT the use of which was provoked secondary to biochemical failure (PSA threshold of 0.2-5.0 ng/mL) with no evidence of metastatic disease. A comparison of the clinical variables between the groups showed a higher median PSA level at diagnosis (P = 0.027) and biopsy Gleason score (P = 0.052) in the delayed HT group. The immediate and delayed HT groups had similar metastatic-free (P = 0.549), disease-specific (P = 0.843) and overall survival (P = 0.843). Overall, biochemical failure developed in half the patients and distant metastasis in 13%, with only nine patients dying from disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Immediate and delayed HT provide similar treatment outcomes in patients with surgically managed lymph node-positive prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17155975     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06648.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  6 in total

Review 1.  Androgen suppression strategies for prostate cancer: is there an ideal approach?

Authors:  Mohamed Ismail; Matthew Ferroni; Leonard G Gomella
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Long-term oncological outcomes in patients with limited nodal disease undergoing radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection without adjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Philipp Mandel; Clemens Rosenbaum; Raisa S Pompe; Thomas Steuber; Georg Salomon; Felix K Chun; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Derya Tilki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Optimal timing of hormonal therapy for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Ryuichi Mizuno; Nobuyuki Tanaka; Hiroki Ide; Masanori Hasegawa; Masaru Ishida; Nozomi Hayakawa; Yota Yasumizu; Masayuki Hagiwara; Satoshi Hara; Eiji Kikuchi; Akira Miyajima; Ken Nakagawa; Yosuke Nakajima; So Nakamura; Jun Nakashima; Mototsugu Oya
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Impact of adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy on disease progression in patients with node-positive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sejun Park; Seong Cheol Kim; Wansuk Kim; Cheryn Song; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-11-17

Review 5.  Early versus deferred androgen suppression therapy for patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer after local therapy with curative intent: a systematic review.

Authors:  Frank Kunath; Bastian Keck; Gerta Rücker; Edith Motschall; Bernd Wullich; Gerd Antes; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Single Positive Lymph Node Prostate Cancer Can Be Treated Surgically without Recurrence.

Authors:  Dae Keun Kim; Kyo Chul Koo; Ali Abdel Raheem; Ki Hong Kim; Byung Ha Chung; Young Deuk Choi; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.