Literature DB >> 10652406

Evaluation of implant losses and skin reactions around extraoral bone-anchored implants: A 0- to 8-year follow-up.

R A Reyes1, A Tjellström, G Granström.   

Abstract

This is an 8-year follow-up of a group of 214 patients who underwent surgical insertion of titanium implants in the mastoid process for the retention of bone-anchored hearing aids and auricular prostheses. The skin reactions around the implants and the various factors dealing with implant loss were evaluated. The number of patients who never had any episode of adverse skin reactions during the 8-year period is 70% and is about the same as previously reported. The frequency and degree of adverse skin reactions were noted to be decreasing with time. The young age group had the highest incidence of adverse skin reactions, and this high frequency is consistent with results of earlier reports. None of the remaining group of patients (30%) who had 1 or more episodes of adverse skin reactions lost their implants because of this problem; most implant losses were primarily the result of loss of integration. The probability of losing an implant because of adverse skin reactions is quite low; however, these skin reactions, if left untreated, may eventually lead to implant loss or withdrawal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10652406     DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(00)70255-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  23 in total

1.  Osseointegrated implant applications in cosmetic and functional skull base rehabilitation.

Authors:  Brent J Benscoter; James J Jaber; Matthew L Kircher; Sam J Marzo; John P Leonetti
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2011-09

2.  Skin reactions following BAHA surgery using the skin flap dermatome technique.

Authors:  Vincent Van Rompaey; Gerd Claes; Nadia Verstraeten; Joost van Dinther; Andrzej Zarowski; Erwin Offeciers; Thomas Somers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Wide diameter bone-anchored hearing system implants: a comparison of long-term follow-up data between tissue reduction and tissue preservation techniques.

Authors:  Martin Reznitsky; Kirsten Wielandt; Søren Foghsgaard
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  A systematic review on skin complications of bone-anchored hearing aids in relation to surgical techniques.

Authors:  Shwan Mohamad; Imran Khan; S Y Hey; S S Musheer Hussain
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  BAHA®: The Direct Bone Conductor.

Authors:  Patrik Westerkull
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-06

6.  A multicenter study on objective and subjective benefits with a transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid device: first Nordic results.

Authors:  Dan Dupont Hougaard; Soren Kjaergaard Boldsen; Anne Marie Jensen; Soren Hansen; Per Cayé Thomassen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Principles of implant-based reconstruction and rehabilitation of craniofacial defects.

Authors:  Brinda Thimmappa; Sabine C Girod
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2010-03

8.  Simplified technique without skin flap for the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implant.

Authors:  R Bovo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.124

9.  Bone anchored hearing aid: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2002-09-01

10.  Modified Baha Punch Technique: Least Invasive, Shortest Time and No Suturing.

Authors:  Hassan Alshehri; Abdulrahman Alsanosi; Osama Majdalawieh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.