Literature DB >> 24913253

Risk of comorbidities and outcomes in patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding - a nationwide study.

Preethi G K Venkatesh1, Basile Njei, Madhusudhan R Sanaka, Udayakumar Navaneethan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of comorbidities on outcomes of patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) remains unknown.
OBJECTIVE: Investigate the prevalence of comorbidities and impact on outcomes of patients with LGIB.
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2010 was used to identify patients who had a primary discharge diagnosis of LGIB based on International Classification of Diseases, the 9th revision, clinical modification codes. The presence of comorbid illness was assessed using the Elixhauser index. Logistic regression models were used to assess the contributions of the individual Elixhauser comorbidities to predict in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 58,296 discharges with LGIB were identified. The overall mortality was 2.3 %. Among the patients who underwent colonoscopy, 17.3 % of patients had therapeutic intervention. As the number of comorbidities increased (i.e., 0, 1, 2, or >3), mortality increased (1.7, 2.0, 2.4, and 2.4 %, respectively). The mortality rate was highest in patients >65 years of age (2.7 %). Patients >65 years of age with two or more comorbidities had a mortality rate of 5 % as compared to 2.6 % in those with less than two comorbidities. Congestive heart failure (odds ratio, 1.67 [95 % confidence interval, 1.48-1.95]), liver disease (2.64 [1.83-3.80]), renal failure (1.99 [1.70-2.33]), and weight loss (2.66 [2.27-3.12]) were associated with a significant increase in mortality rate. Comorbidities increased hospital stay and costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities were associated with increased the risk of mortality and health care utilization in patients with LGIB. Identification of comorbidities and development of risk-adjustment tools may improve the outcome of patients with LGIB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24913253      PMCID: PMC4823646          DOI: 10.1007/s00384-014-1915-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data.

Authors:  Danielle A Southern; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  The coagulopathy of chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Armando Tripodi; Pier Mannuccio Mannucci
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  How severity measures rate hospitalized patients.

Authors:  J S Hughes; L I Iezzoni; J Daley; L Greenberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 6.  Effect of comorbidity on mortality in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Grigorios I Leontiadis; Michael Molloy-Bland; Paul Moayyedi; Colin W Howden
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Increased mortality with peptic ulcer bleeding in patients with both compensated and decompensated cirrhosis.

Authors:  Preethi G K Venkatesh; Sravanthi Parasa; Basile Njei; Madhusudhan R Sanaka; Udayakumar Navaneethan
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Assessing hospital-associated deaths from discharge data. The role of length of stay and comorbidities.

Authors:  S F Jencks; D K Williams; T L Kay
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  T A Rockall; R F Logan; H B Devlin; T C Northfield
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Timing of colonoscopy and outcomes in patients with lower GI bleeding: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Udayakumar Navaneethan; Basile Njei; Preethi G K Venkatesh; Madhusudhan R Sanaka
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  3 in total

1.  Laboratory test variables useful for distinguishing upper from lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Minoru Tomizawa; Fuminobu Shinozaki; Rumiko Hasegawa; Yoshinori Shirai; Yasufumi Motoyoshi; Takao Sugiyama; Shigenori Yamamoto; Naoki Ishige
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Lower GI Bleeding: An Update on Incidences and Causes.

Authors:  Titilayo Adegboyega; David Rivadeneira
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-11-11

3.  Prediction of Outcome in Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding Using Gradient Boosting.

Authors:  Lakshmana Ayaru; Petros-Pavlos Ypsilantis; Abigail Nanapragasam; Ryan Chang-Ho Choi; Anish Thillanathan; Lee Min-Ho; Giovanni Montana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.