Literature DB >> 24913128

Spontaneous expression of magnetic compass orientation in an epigeic rodent: the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus.

Ludmila Oliveriusová1, Pavel Němec, Zuzana Pavelková, František Sedláček.   

Abstract

Magnetoreception has been convincingly demonstrated in only a few mammalian species. Among rodents, magnetic compass orientation has been documented in four species of subterranean mole rats and two epigeic (i.e. active above ground) species-the Siberian hamster and the C57BL/6J mouse. The mole rats use the magnetic field azimuth to determine compass heading; their directional preference is spontaneous and unimodal, and their magnetic compass is magnetite-mediated. By contrast, the primary component of orientation response is learned in the hamster and the mouse, but both species also exhibit a weak spontaneous bimodal preference in the natural magnetic field. To determine whether the magnetic compass of wild epigeic rodents features the same functional properties as that of laboratory rodents, we investigated magnetic compass orientation in the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus (Cricetidae, Rodentia). The voles exhibited a robust spontaneous bimodal directional preference, i.e. built nests and slept preferentially along the north-south axis, and deflected their directional preference according to a shift in the direction of magnetic north, clearly indicating that they were deriving directional information from the magnetic field. Thus, bimodal, axially symmetrical directional choice seems to be a common feature shared by epigeic rodents. However, spontaneous directional preference in the bank vole appeared to be more pronounced than that reported in the hamster and the mouse. These findings suggest that bank voles are well suited for future studies investigating the adaptive significance and mechanisms of magnetic orientation in epigeic rodents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24913128     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-014-1192-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  37 in total

Review 1.  Magnetite-based magnetoreception.

Authors:  J L Kirschvink; M M Walker; C E Diebel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  A simple permutation-type method for testing circular uniformity with correlated angular measurements.

Authors:  D A Follmann; M A Proschan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Resonance effects indicate a radical-pair mechanism for avian magnetic compass.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Peter Thalau; John B Phillips; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Light alters nociceptive effects of magnetic field shielding in mice: intensity and wavelength considerations.

Authors:  Frank S Prato; Dawn Desjardins-Holmes; Lynn D Keenliside; Julia C McKay; John A Robertson; Alex W Thomas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Directional orientation of birds by the magnetic field under different light conditions.

Authors:  Roswitha Wiltschko; Katrin Stapput; Peter Thalau; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Changing and shielded magnetic fields suppress c-Fos expression in the navigation circuit: input from the magnetosensory system contributes to the internal representation of space in a subterranean rodent.

Authors:  Tomás Burger; Marcela Lucová; Regina E Moritz; Helmut H A Oelschläger; Rastislav Druga; Hynek Burda; Wolfgang Wiltschko; Roswitha Wiltschko; Pavel Nemec
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Neuroanatomy of magnetoreception: the superior colliculus involved in magnetic orientation in a mammal.

Authors:  P Nemec; J Altmann; S Marhold; H Burda; H H Oelschlager
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Cattle on pastures do align along the North-South axis, but the alignment depends on herd density.

Authors:  P Slaby; K Tomanova; M Vacha
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Magnetic compass orientation in the blind mole rat Spalax ehrenbergi.

Authors:  T Kimchi; J Terkel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Rapid learning of magnetic compass direction by C57BL/6 mice in a 4-armed 'plus' water maze.

Authors:  John B Phillips; Paul W Youmans; Rachel Muheim; Kelly A Sloan; Lukas Landler; Michael S Painter; Christopher R Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Magnetoreception in the wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus): influence of weak frequency-modulated radio frequency fields.

Authors:  E Pascal Malkemper; Stephan H K Eder; Sabine Begall; John B Phillips; Michael Winklhofer; Vlastimil Hart; Hynek Burda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Do subterranean mammals use the Earth's magnetic field as a heading indicator to dig straight tunnels?

Authors:  Sandra Malewski; Sabine Begall; Cristian E Schleich; C Daniel Antenucci; Hynek Burda
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.