Literature DB >> 23700176

Cattle on pastures do align along the North-South axis, but the alignment depends on herd density.

P Slaby1, K Tomanova, M Vacha.   

Abstract

Alignment is a spontaneous behavioral preference of particular body orientation that may be seen in various vertebrate or invertebrate taxa. Animals often optimize their positions according to diverse directional environmental factors such as wind, stream, slope, sun radiation, etc. Magnetic alignment represents the simplest directional response to the geomagnetic field and a growing body of evidence of animals aligning their body positions according to geomagnetic lines whether at rest or during feedings is accumulating. Recently, with the aid of Google Earth application, evidence of prevailing North-South (N-S) body orientation of cattle on pastures was published (Begall et al. PNAS 105:13451-13455, 2008; Burda et al. PNAS 106:5708-5713, 2009). Nonetheless, a subsequent study from a different laboratory did not confirm this phenomenon (Hert et al. J Comp Physiol A 197:677-682, 2011). The aim of our study was to enlarge the pool of independently gained data on this remarkable animal behavior. By satellite snapshots analysis and using blinded protocol we scored positions of 2,235 individuals in 74 herds. Our results are in line with the original findings of prevailing N-S orientation of grazing cattle. In addition, we found that mutual distances between individual animals within herds (herd density) affect their N-S preference-a new phenomenon giving some insight into biological significance of alignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23700176     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-013-0827-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  24 in total

1.  Magnetically sensitive light-induced reactions in cryptochrome are consistent with its proposed role as a magnetoreceptor.

Authors:  Kiminori Maeda; Alexander J Robinson; Kevin B Henbest; Hannah J Hogben; Till Biskup; Margaret Ahmad; Erik Schleicher; Stefan Weber; Christiane R Timmel; P J Hore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The physics and neurobiology of magnetoreception.

Authors:  Sönke Johnsen; Kenneth J Lohmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  Magnetoreception.

Authors:  Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Magnetic compass orientation by larval Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  David H Dommer; Patrick J Gazzolo; Michael S Painter; John B Phillips
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.354

5.  Photoreceptor-based magnetoreception: optimal design of receptor molecules, cells, and neuronal processing.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Margaret Ahmad; Henrik Mouritsen; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  The magnetic compass of domestic chickens, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiltschko; Rafael Freire; Ursula Munro; Thorsten Ritz; Lesley Rogers; Peter Thalau; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Avian magnetite-based magnetoreception: a physiologist's perspective.

Authors:  Hervé Cadiou; Peter A McNaughton
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Magnetic compass orientation in the blind mole rat Spalax ehrenbergi.

Authors:  T Kimchi; J Terkel
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Zebrafish respond to the geomagnetic field by bimodal and group-dependent orientation.

Authors:  Akira Takebe; Toshiki Furutani; Tatsunori Wada; Masami Koinuma; Yoko Kubo; Keiko Okano; Toshiyuki Okano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Magnetoreception system in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Chin-Yuan Hsu; Fu-Yao Ko; Chia-Wei Li; Kuni Fann; Juh-Tzeng Lue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Spontaneous magnetic alignment behaviour in free-living lizards.

Authors:  Francisco J Diego-Rasilla; Valentín Pérez-Mellado; Ana Pérez-Cembranos
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-03-01

2.  Spontaneous expression of magnetic compass orientation in an epigeic rodent: the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus.

Authors:  Ludmila Oliveriusová; Pavel Němec; Zuzana Pavelková; František Sedláček
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-06-10

3.  Effect of exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields on melatonin levels in calves is seasonally dependent.

Authors:  Tereza Kolbabová; E Pascal Malkemper; Luděk Bartoš; Jacques Vanderstraeten; Marek Turčáni; Hynek Burda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Dogs are sensitive to small variations of the Earth's magnetic field.

Authors:  Erich Pascal Malkemper; Sabine Begall; Vlastimil Hart; Petra Nováková; Vladimír Hanzal; Miloš Ježek; Tomáš Kušta; Veronika Němcová; Jana Adámková; Kateřina Benediktová; Jaroslav Červený; Hynek Burda
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Statistical Evaluations of Variations in Dairy Cows' Milk Yields as a Precursor of Earthquakes.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yamauchi; Masashi Hayakawa; Tomokazu Asano; Nobuyo Ohtani; Mitsuaki Ohta
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  An experimental approach in revisiting the magnetic orientation of cattle.

Authors:  Debby Weijers; Lia Hemerik; Ignas M A Heitkönig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Communications Principles for Inviting Inquiry and Exploration Through Science and Data Visualization.

Authors:  Eric Rodenbeck
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.326

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.